250
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

(page 4) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

I'm looking forward to the next UK election where the headline will be: Labour has lost the election in a landslide that left them with dozens of votes total

Every single person who didn't think this would affect them who watches porn in any capacity is very likely highly pissed off and will continue to be for as long as this draconian bullshit is enabled.

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

this is obviously such a dumpster fire that I can't help but wonder, "When will they realize how dumb this is and back out of it?"

then i remember that Brexit happened

fuckin stubbornness is a national identity for you blokes innit

[-] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

We didn't have a referendum on this though, and if we had done I don't think it would have passed

[-] Shayeta@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago

Same was said during Brexit.

[-] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

We very much did have a referendum on brexit though

[-] Shayeta@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

What I meant was during the Brexit referendum most people were saying it wouldn't pass. In other words, if there was a referendum for this it probably WOULD pass since it's really easy to influence people through media.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

after reports in Guido Fawkes suggested it was possible.

That's the only source? A far-right conspiracy website?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago

Enterprises will love that. A perfect excuse to end wfh. However, this will cripple business travelers. I'm sure there'll be some exception for corporations where they can exercise maximum control over their employees while still being allowed to generate capital.

Hey UK: suck it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The linked story has been updated. The headline now reads:

Labour rules out VPN ban in UK but issues warning to UK households

Labour won't ban the use of Virtual Private Networks

And the story begins:

Labour has ruled out a possible VPN ban after reports thousands of UK households were at risk following the Online Safety Act kicking in under the government. Labour Party Tech Secretary Peter Kyle has revealed that the Government is "not considering a VPN ban" - after reports in Guido Fawkes suggested it was possible.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

This shows that this bill has shit all to do with the protection of children, it's just again the over reach of religious zealots

Can we please ban religions instead? This would ACTUALLY protect minors and just in general make the world such a better and more beautiful place.

Convert churches into museums for art and displaying the horrors of religion

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago

You cant ban vpns, its easy for tech people to set up a vpn server on any server on the internet and connect to it. Wireguard for example, super simple.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

China Laughs Communistically

[-] inkrifle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Labour has already spoken out and said they will make no attempts to ban VPNs.

[-] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

I doubt their corpo overlords would allow a VPN ban considering the amount of companies that use them.

[-] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This makes me feel like they were in a bind here. The so called "online safety bill" was a tory concoction that took years to pass through the courts because of how invasive it is and how anyone could easily bypass it.

If labour want to stop it, they'll be accused of not wanting to protect children.

Whatever anyone thinks of labour, I'd ask people to ask themselves, if you were in that position, what option do they have other than to let it play out as the spectacular failure it was always going to be and making sure everyone knows who's fault that was afterwards?

[-] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

No. They could put it into a review and quietly shitcan this. It's not particularly popular. They just want to say they're protecting kids.

They're spineless and Keir is an authoritarian.

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

There are ways around this even if they do ban vpn. Its a hopeless battle being fought by the ignorant.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] WaffleWarrior@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

I though the UK was a Western democracy. What the hell are you guys doing over there?

[-] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Lol. Democracy.

Democracies don't care about their citizens privacy. Just the optics of getting spied on citizens.

[-] ColdWater@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
250 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

74669 readers
328 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS