-19
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hexarei@beehaw.org 27 points 4 months ago

TL;DR: In which the author doesn't comprehend that Rust can do everything C can do on the same hardware, and overstates the stability of C as a language, pleading sentiment over sensibility.

[-] Scoopta@programming.dev 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Just to play devil's advocate. Until rust gets a production ready GCC backend or LLVM gets more esoteric HW support there are probably some platforms that cannot run rust. That being said... realistically I think by the time rust becomes a large enough part of the kernel for it to matter the issue will have been sorted out as there are already 2 GCC implementations of rust in development...

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

The author claims to be an expert in Rust, so at least they don't come from a standpoint of 'I hate Rust and everyone who recommends it' which seems to be somewhat popular

[-] bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com 21 points 4 months ago

TLDR; it's the way we've always done it and there's a lot of inertia so we won't put in a plan for the future because that's a lot of work.

[-] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 15 points 4 months ago

What is this modern programing method C. We need to get back to the purist programming language...

Assembly /s

[-] soc@programming.dev 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Absolutely delusional.

code that is readable, auditable, and easy to port

Yeah C is the language that comes to everybody's mind reading that. /s

C's simplicity ...

Is that simplicity currently in the room with us?

... and widespread adoption make it the best choice for this philosophy.

Ah, the asbestos argument.


If people want to run the latest kernels on hardware that isn't maintained anymore, they need to toughen up and send patches ...

... or they stick to an old kernel for their unmaintained hardware.

Both is fine to me, but that entitled Boomer attitude of "nobody should have nice things, because that would challenge status quo" needs to die.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago

I almost agree, but I think that supporting old hardware practically forever would be a nice thing to have.

Luckily, it doesn't evolve anymore and given time Rust will likely have that support if it would be necessary for its role in the kernel.

[-] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 months ago

The arguments are, at best, a reason not to have Rust as the primary language in the kernel. Implementing new hardware drivers or platforms is still viable even if you accept everything here.

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
-19 points (28.9% liked)

Linux

10530 readers
996 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS