586
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ElectricWaterfall@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 day ago

How does this benefit Nintendo? I don’t understand.

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago

Probably because a lot of nintendo games are speedrun on emulators. Since it can be difficult to attain region specific hardware and cartridges that are optimal for speedrunning, they resort to emulators so the barrier of entry isn't unreasonable.

And we all know how Nintendo feels about emulators.

Not to say it explains how it benefits Nintendo. But it explains why they're going this route.

[-] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago

nintendo wants total, and I mean TOTAL control over their IP. not a smidge must escape their grasp.

if they could take down every fanart and every meme with their IP in it, they would

[-] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

They want these people to license the rights to play the game at events, etc. Like showing a movie or a sports game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

People should remake the game they like so much and move on from nintendo bullshit

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago

I think Astro Bot is already better than any 3D Mario.

We're missing a really good kart racer though. CTR wasn't it (and certainly not after they stuffed a load of DLC into it weeks after release), and the last one I really enjoyed was Speed Freaks on the PS1...

[-] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

You don't seem to understand the problem. People need to switch to games released under open licenses

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Enjoy Tux Racer, I guess

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Putting out a kart racer is problematic. I got to play an alpha POC from a fairly large studio. It borrowed heavily from Mario Kart. The physics felt right. The challenges felt right, the weapons felt right, and the balance to let underdogs still be competitive seemed great.

In the end it didn't get greenlit. I think in the end a lot of what Mario kart has is standing on the shoulders of their IP. It's undeniably fun It is a great party game, But cart racing isn't for everyone and If racing isn't your thing you can at least still identify with your favorite characters.

If you took Mario kart and replaced all of the characters with Miis, I don't think anybody would want to play it.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

Thing is, even if you look at all the Mario Kart characters, there's only a handful that are big names. Nobody wants to play as a Shy Guy. Even Link and Zelda feel wildly out of place, although maybe they wouldn't have done in a Links Awakening style rather than what they went for.

I think Sony could do an Astro Bot on it and put in a bunch of their other characters in there. Lego has potential if they can get a bunch of their licensed characters in there (although you know with that kind of money floating around, most of them will be DLC locked behind Harry Potter packs, etc). A horrendously expensive MCU license maybe with some chibified characters.

I think Mario Kart just has that easy "an idiot can play it" gameplay, but it doesn't get boring once you know what you're doing. It's a really hard balance to get right. The only recent attempt was CTR, and it didn't have that first factor at all, it was hard as nails.

[-] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

Lego already had kart racer games! They could just revive one

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Eh_I@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Nintendo's lawyers won't stop until they kill Nintendo.

Looks like money got to their heads. What a shame.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thesmokingman@programming.dev 17 points 1 day ago

The most shocking thing to me is that they’re going to feature Nintendo games in the future. I wouldn’t want to jump through all of those hoops just to possibly be rejected or have the content taken down arbitrarily in the future when Nintendo is feeling capricious. That’s a huge investment for very poor expected value.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
586 points (99.5% liked)

Games

20752 readers
570 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS