81

I mean, there are cultural aspects of this that I have to really immerse myself in because I’m not Japanese. It feels almost a little invasive to be telling the story from their perspective, but what the hell? Somebody’s got to tell the story, and I’m not going to tell it from a jingoistic, nationalistic American perspective, because I don’t want to deal with all the sociopolitical aspects of, should it have been dropped, all that stuff. I don’t want to deal with that.

I’ve got to be very careful about it not being an indictment of the people who dropped the bomb. I think the message needs to be, this thing happened. It happened to real people. Let’s not go into why it happened and who was to blame and all that sort of thing. But let’s just take that as a moment in history frozen in amber that we need to learn from. We need to cherish that memory, because that memory might just keep us alive.

How can you learn from something without understanding why it happened?

The next level of shoot and cry is shoot and I wasn't even there. I was sleeping

I guess Hiroshima just did that what-the-hell

(page 2) 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BynarsAreOk@hexbear.net 6 points 23 hours ago

Meh he will say stuff like this but I don't think he is either stupid or incompetent enough to not understand you can't dictate how people see and consume art, artist's intent is not omnipotent. You can try to be as "impartial" as you want but if he is truly invested into showing the horror and atrocity then people will make the connection.

This is like making Titanic but not including the speed limit controversy choosing to not willingly vilify Ismay in the movie. He knows what he needs to do to do a good movie, that scene along with Ismay's portrayal as a literal mustache twirling villain is not at all necessary for the movie, yet he added anyway, not because of accuracy either as the real Titanic inquiry testimony is quite different from this. As such a Titanic nerd he knew this would be inaccurate.

So he "knows" what he is doing even if he wont say it out loud, these interviews are just to create buzz, he already got fuck off level money he can do whatever he wants. I only think its likely he is already afraid of Trump affecting Hollywood, [insert subverting expectations meme here] etc... Watch liberals be shocked that the US is shown committing the biggest atrocity ever etc...

[-] AMBER_BOT@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago
[-] laziestflagellant@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

Imagine this is the movie that he's going to use his big money AI investments on what-the-hell

[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago

I remember when Cameron was hailed as a materialist auteur

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

🤦‍♂️

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
81 points (100.0% liked)

Movies & TV

23402 readers
248 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS