26
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago

As a non-American I sum it up as this: For the last 50 years (that I am old enough to know about) Democrats don't have the answer so they are bad. Republicans don't have the answer but will lie to us every minute of the day to keep us happy so they are good. Then Americans wonder why their country is about to implode.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

If this was the case, Republicans would always win and Democrats would always lose.

That's not the case, though. Recently people just vote for the party that is out of power, because no matter who gets elected everything gets worse. Republicans get elected, everything gets worse, so people vote for Democrats next time. Then the Democrats get elected, everything gets worse, and so people vote for Republicans next time. Over and over until we're all dead.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago

Except everything did not get worse under Biden.

[-] piefood@feddit.online 0 points 4 months ago

Yeah, everything didn't get worse, just the basics like housing, healthcare, the economy, the environment, the military, policing...

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago

Not a fan of Biden, but his admin was like the definition of "status quo".

Which sucks, but that's a different conversation. It's unequivocally superior to whatever the fuck is going on right now.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

I'd say the "status quo" is getting worse. The system itself makes things worse without intervention. And for a Biden specific failure, the non-prosecution of Republican crimes against democracy haven't just allowed the criminals to freely continue, but normalized those crimes and enabled the criminals to become even worse.

[-] sepi@piefed.social 1 points 4 months ago

"I'm stupid so I am gonna vote for the abusive asshole"

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Americans: "We took all power away from Democrats and gave it to Republicans. Why aren't Democrats saving us from what we did?"

[-] piefood@feddit.online 4 points 4 months ago

Democratic Leadership when they have power: "We can't afford to give you the healthcare/housing/economy/peace/rights that we promised, which is well below the healthcare/housing/economy/peace/rights that you actually need, sorry. Anyway, we're off to spend all your tax money on the military, intelligence agencies, and our rich friends. Good luck out there."

Democratic Leadership afterwards: "Wait, why aren't you voting for us?"

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

They had four years to hold the last Trump administration accountable and prevent all this.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 4 months ago
  1. Well then maybe they should've done something while they had that power.

  2. The Democrats have eagerly given up what little power they had to obstruct Trump's agenda.

  3. Political power is about a lot more than the power afforded to one by their political office. The Democrats should be out there whipping the sane two thirds of America into action, not sitting on their asses and sucking off Mango Mussolini.

[-] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

So, what are y'all going to vote? Is there a sane, truly social-democrat (or "actually leftish") alternative? Maybe that third party already exists, maybe somebody saw the sign of the times and started one?

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Corporate Democrats: "But we re-branded our feckless, pro-corporate messaging to look more like Mandamis?!?"

[-] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Lol, yeah, they can try again. Maybe go full bore.

[-] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

Did they though? The furthest they got was Harris afaics.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
26 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26676 readers
588 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS