193

I'll be honest: I think matchmaking is just a better experience for how I like to play FPS games. I never got a sense of "community" from sticking with a given server; I would come to find something like it via Discord years later but not just from frequenting a given game server. My server browser experience was mostly that I'd join a game in a progress, as other people come and go from a game in progress, and I wondered what the point of the match was if the teams weren't even the same at the end of the match as when they began. Most people's default when running a server was to turn player numbers to max and, in Battlefield's case, "tickets" needed to win as well, but just because the numbers are bigger doesn't mean that it's better pacing for a match, for instance. Matchmaking sets the defaults and ensures a pretty consistent experience from start to finish of each match.

This comment from the developer is true, too.

"Matchmaking servers spin up in seconds (get filled with players), and spin down after the game is over," Sirland wrote in a thread on X last week. "That couple of seconds when servers lose a lot of players mid-game is the only time you can join, which makes it a tricky combination (and full of queuing to join issues).

My preference for the matchmaking experience is reflected across the audience they cater to, and it contributed to an industry focus on matchmaking and the end of server browsers.

But we still need real server browsers.

If we bought a game, we should be able to do what we want with it, including running those max player/max ticket servers that run 24/7 on one map. We should be able to do it without DICE/EA's permission, on our own if we so choose, without salaried staff running master server operations, because one day the revenue this game brings in will not justify the costs to keep it going. We should be able to deal with cheaters by vote kicking them from the server rather than installing increasingly invasive mandatory anti cheat solutions that don't even fully solve the problem anyway, because it's unsolvable.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 59 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It would be nice if we had both options. Let people matchmake for the default experience and let those that prefer custom servers to use those instead. There are problems with using only community hosted servers, such as game rules and less ideal admins.

That being said, the longevity that community servers offer is likely the reason they have been scrapped by EA. They want everyone to move to the next title that comes out like what people do with CoD.

EDIT: Typos from mobile

I loved the servers that were 24/7 metro, no drags etc. some of those were (and still are) my favorite. Or pistols only, no Glock 18. When you get rid of custom servers you get rid of that custom experience.

[-] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Didn't the try something similar in 2042 but on their own servers? edit: portal

[-] Baggie@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 month ago

I miss community servers terribly.

[-] justlemmyin@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Bit it doesn't even work on linux, basically DOA for me.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

supposedly doesn't work on windows either if you play valorant or maybe other games with similar anticheats competing for the same system area no video game shoud have control over

[-] rozodru@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

ah so that post I saw the other day saying "begun the kernel wars have" makes senses. someone posted the fact they couldn't play BF6 cause Valorant was installed.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

yeah. I've been wondering when this would happen since spore. Took longer than I expected really.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 10 points 1 month ago

God yes. I would rather have a few popular servers over endless empty matchmaking

[-] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

I want servers so I can avoid playing maps I don't like... Looking at you Siege of Cairo.

[-] poolhelmetinstrument@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

More like a real server browser with real self hosted dedicated servers. Couldn’t imagine mods at this point

[-] griffinite_psx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

A server browser similar to Arma would have been a godsend as it allows people to set up unique rules, experiment with different game modes and play around the map itself. While BF isn’t a milsim sandbox game a server browser is what keeps older BF games alive especially on console and the removal of that does make you wonder if we’ll be playing BF6 a decade down the line.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

They are implementing just that. Official servers don't show up on it but everything hosted by the community does.

[-] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Server browsers are the better experience for me. Jump in a game and its already going, less pressure to stay because there's no matchmaking ban/penalties. Everyone is there primarily to have fun because KD WL MMR ELO isnt being logged. If im desperately outclassed, or life gets in the way, I can just quit with no guilt or punishment. If im having a good time i can stay with mostly the same people for a long time.

Thats before you even get into the technicalities and longevity considerations.

[-] rozodru@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Plus it's great if the server is made specifically for a map you really love. Like TFC/TF2 with say 24/7 2fort. I love me some 2fort and yeah I will play it for hours on end, it's comfy.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Bring back community servers, so the developers can keep their official servers and people that want to play on community servers can do that do.

It's a solved problem that publishers tells you is hard to do in the name of money.

Don't look harder into it.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That's exactly what they did. You have official matchmaking, then you have community servers people host. If you use official rules, you can still earn xp in the community servers.

They have a server browser, official matchmaking servers just don't show up but they only last one game anyways.

[-] purplerabbit@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

One doesn't need to replace the other.:)

The big problem with matchmaking is that in the long run, it kills game. When people start to move on to a new thing, the population that stays because they're attached to the game gets fucked over by matchmaking.

The less people they are, the worse it works. That's when a server browser and the ability to run community server becomes crucial. It will keep a game alive for a decade after its last update.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That’s perfectly acceptable justification to shut down gameservers and profit from people moving to the next version of the game. Gone are the days of private servers, especially with client and serverside mods, that kept people engaged with an older game for years. That’s not profitable.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They will have community servers with its own browser. The servers will have full xp as long as the rules are close to the official ones.

Matchmaking wont be the only option.

[-] Krzd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Still, DICE insists the Portal browser will satisfy. It does have some qualities that simulate a classic server experience, like how you can earn full XP in Portal matches as long as the house rules closely resemble the vanilla ones.

From the article.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They have a browser where you can run your own games. If you use official rules, you get full xp. I don't get what people are complaining about.

You can earn full XP in Portal matches as long as the house rules closely resemble the vanilla ones

[-] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Yep. This is the correct answer but that’s not what this thread is about; it’s a nostalgic circle jerk mixed with a sprinkling of “back in my day”.

Don’t get me wrong here, I like the suggestions in this thread but literally one of the suggestions being upvoted is how the game is planned to handle servers (quick join is random and then there will be a list of community servers).

I’m fine with the official servers being random join, as long as I can pick and choose a community server. Which to state again, is apparently planned.

I’m still waiting for reviews on release to make sure they hold true to their marketing though. Can’t trust shit from large studios.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

As per the article, persistence, and a way to bypass DICE.

Speaking for myself, I miss multiplayer games before they had XP and progression.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They are persistent, they stay open as long as someone is in it. No one is kicked after the game.

Bypass dice isn't a feature but a fantasy, never happening. I don't really get what it would bring to the table either.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The ability to keep the video game. The ability to play it on a LAN. It's not a fantasy; it's history. We used to have this.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's more then a server browser. You are just being deceptive. You cherry picked the one quote in the article that makes it look like there is nothing in your post and your comments aren't honest.

What you are talking about is a whole other debate entirely and simply not how the industry runs anymore when it comes to multiplayer shooters.

I want that stuff too but that's not what server browser means. The finals and cod don't have server browsers. Bf6 will have a server browser.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That limitation, and the inability to sidestep DICE by renting a server that never shuts down, made it difficult for communities to take shape in Portal.

The ideas are bound together. Same with anti cheat. Same with preservation. Removing private servers caused all of these problems at the same time. The author of the article speaks for the group who want the community that I admitted never mattered to me, that Portal doesn't provide, but other knock-on effects of the death of the server browser do matter to me.

[-] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Based on the article, a server is probably a docker container or something like it they spin up and replace each new match. Sounds to me like they deliberately designed around a system that makes a server browser impossible.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The way I interpreted that part was that they were trying to smooth over the frustrating part of finding a server, because at large scale, you end up in a spot where it's difficult to actually secure a slot on one. That might be their reasoning, but it's still an excuse to omit a key feature.

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Article about BF6: shows picture of BF2042.

[-] threshold_dweller@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wolf ET never stopped having a server browser... ;)

[-] all4one@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago
[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

You don't have to. You can still play it!

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's very simple. If it doesn't have a Server Browser, has MTX, has Gacha, has Rootkits, is Online Only/No LAN, or is made by any of the AAA studios, I don't play it.

[-] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Vote with your wallet and don't buy this. Many years ago we've got dedicated servers and free map builders. Nowadays we get matchmaking and 3 maps and additional 3 for 20 bucks.

[-] smol_beans@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

When it comes to video games you will always get outvoted by millions or children who don't know any better and don't care.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Oh no, whatever will I do with my time if I can't play with literal children.

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
193 points (98.5% liked)

Games

42633 readers
163 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS