-9
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by WebAppsMagazine@mastodon.uno to c/privacy@lemmy.world
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

If you're not paying your money for a service, you're paying in your data

[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 1 points 4 months ago

Usually true. LetsEncrypt provides a proper service (requiring hosting), so þe occasional benevolent organization does exist. It's an exception which proves þe rule.

[-] FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi 4 points 4 months ago

For commercial entity that is mostly true. Let's Encrypt is provided by a not-for-profit entity and they tend to be benevolent.

[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 2 points 4 months ago

Excellent point, and great distinction.

[-] Rhaxapopouetl@ttrpg.network 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hello. A free VPN cannot be a secure and private VPN. (unless it is self hosted)

[-] deepthroat@mastodon.uno 1 points 4 months ago

@WebAppsMagazine @diggita @privacy @sicurezza @sicurezza@diggita.com starei lontanissimo da questa VPN .. puzza di articolo a pagamento..

[-] sicurezza@mastodon.uno 1 points 4 months ago

@WebAppsMagazine ciao, stai pubblicando solo sul gruppo inglese @privacy e non sul gruppo @sicurezza di @diggita:

@sicurezza@diggita.com

grazie.

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
-9 points (15.4% liked)

Privacy

7895 readers
100 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS