33
FFmpeg moves to Forgejo (code.ffmpeg.org)
submitted 1 month ago by clot27@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] powerofm@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

I guess I'm out of the loop: why do ppl hate forgejo?

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, this is news to me. I think Codeberg runs on Forgejo, and just the other day people were singing its praises when GitHub became part of Microsoft's AI team. This feels like a sudden shift.

[-] toph@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Probably just the weird name. It makes it feel like someone’s weekend personal project.

I use it to self-host my own code and it works great, I’m totally moved off GitHub now.

[-] Sunny@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

Personally uaong forgejo myself and it has been smooth sailing for ages! This is the first time ive ever seen people taking a stance against it, though the ones in the comments sidnt seem to have a good argument.

[-] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I don't even know how to pronounce it. Forge Joe? For Gay Ho?

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I hadn't heard of Forgejo, although I realize now that I have seen repositories using it before. I think it's cool that they even have statically linked binaries of it but it's a bit concerning that like an entire web server is built in because what if there's vulnerabilities? I guess if you regularly stayed up to date it's not too bad then.

Edit: Oh, sounds like it's a fork of Gitea which I have heard of before, interesting.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 1 month ago

i mean, the web server in question is the Go standard library. if there is a vuln in there we have bigger problems, considering it's also used by the docker binary.

[-] MrTolkinghoen@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

Interesting. Wonder why they forked gitea

[-] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Because the Codeberg folk didn’t like the idea of relying on a product made by a for profit company. https://blog.codeberg.org/codeberg-launches-forgejo.html

[-] MrTolkinghoen@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Looks like it's time to switch.

[-] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Nice, hope they set up their own branding on their instance at some point

[-] dyc3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I apparently got blocked by their anti bot system on mobile

[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago
[-] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

They made a comment on one of their recent blog posts that dealing with the ai onslaught on codeberg has delayed work on federation.

[-] MITM0@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I still find the name weird. Let's do something fun here; Comment what YOU think ForgeJo should be called instead

[-] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I like Esperanto, should stay imo

[-] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago
[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

On one hand, I kind of agree, on another that is at least somewhat a generic term for a gitlab/gitea/github/sourceforce/forgejo/etc, so it might be harder to search.

[-] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

yeah, it should be more unique….
how about “forgey mcforgerton”?

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Laforge is an awesome name, especially for a French company.

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago

Website written by an asshole tho - crawler protection that excludes browsers without javascript enabled.

[-] MHLoppy@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

Can access fine (with reduced functionality) on my end with JS disabled - maybe you have something else tripping it up or something?

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Dunno, it is th duckduckgo browser for Android (from F-Droid store) on default settings that failed to access...

[-] techwithjake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Seems like something else tripping it up. Just tested with DDG Browser from F-Droid. Passed the bot test, no issues. Did have to reload the page once for it to render properly though. After that, worked just fine. Aggressive DNS ad blocker, maybe?

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

My bad, I should have read the error better (although I could have sworn it was complaining about javascript before, I probably misremember): The actual error is

Missing feature Cookies

Still, that is on default settings...

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
33 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

75582 readers
32 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS