590

The UK's Online Safety Act doesn't just age-gate porn; it blocks material deemed "harmful" to minors. Days after the law went into effect, reports of non-explicit content on social media getting blocked in the region started to crop up. Subreddits from r/IsraelCrimes to r/stopsmoking are now walled in the UK. Video games, Spotify, and dating apps have instituted or will institute age checks.

Given the SCOTUS age verification decision [June '25], Stabile fears that people [in the US] will go "mask off" in the fall and spring, when state legislatures start getting back together. "People are going to attempt to restrict the internet even more aggressively," Stabile said. "I think people are going to work to restrict all sorts of content, particularly LGBTQ content, but also content that is broadly defined as any sort of threat or propaganda to minors." Other experts Mashable spoke to agree with him.

"I'm going to jump to the end step," [Eric Goldman, law professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law] said. "The end step is that most online users are going to be required to age authenticate most of the time they visit websites. That's going to become the norm." In a paper he wrote, Goldman called these statutes "segregate-and-suppress" laws.

The stated reason behind these laws is to "protect children." But as journalist Taylor Lorenz pointed out, in the UK, age verification is already preventing children from accessing vital information, such as about menstruation and sexual assault.

"When we see crackdowns on spaces on the internet, we're essentially stripping away that potential for self-actualization," Goldman said. We've reached the dystopian stage of the internet, he added.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 35 points 23 hours ago

It's not about protecting the children and never has been with the Party of Pedos. It's about control.

Outlaw porn. Then start calling LGBTQ folks pornographic. Now it's illegal to be gay. You KNOW they are going in that direction.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Stephen Fry’s character in V For Vendetta is a perfect depiction of this

https://youtu.be/jtVWdplyDx8

[-] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Comrade, it seems you have just committed a thought crime. The thought police are already coming for you. Please do not resist. :)

[-] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 day ago

Pornographic content is literally & figuratively the canary in the coal mine of the internet.

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 14 points 1 day ago

We need to consider building on and spreading the word about other protocols like Tor, Yggdrassil etc etc. Show people that the Commons cannot be stolen again.

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

No. None of those or other prptocols are above legislation or javlass politics. This starts and ends with the public amd who they vote for. Just moving the goal post isnt going to stop this.

[-] Chakravanti@monero.town 1 points 18 hours ago

'Need" means what? I can't hear you.

"Cotton" swabs his ear with a Bowling Pin

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

"Poorly Implemented Attempt to Censor Porn will Ruin Corporate Internet"

There, FTFY

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Poorly implemented? There is no good implementation of censorship or any other restriction on freedom of expression. All attempts to do so are dangerous, existential threats.

[-] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, but it's like it's total slop on top of the censorship part. It's literally adding insult to injury.

[-] regedit@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago

The first time this PII is leaked about some politician's online search history, it will all get repealed.

Wanna stop this? Get some whale to buy up the data and find people pushing this shit and any mass adoption for these things will die. Politicians like to eat up religious lobbyist's shit until it's used to expose their less savory activities to the greater population.

[-] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Now it's all gone. I'll have to buy from resellers, like I'm some kind of drug addict lol.

They will come up with any excuse for total control. I can just see how they look at China and they are burning inside like how come they have everything under control, and our peasants still have freedom of thought, how should this be understood?

[-] Comrade_Squid@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Kids shouldn't use the internet without a parent or teacher monitoring them. We can blame big tech for targeting our most vulnerable and pandering to them, kids are very easy to manipulate vis-à-vis a great target to advertisers, they will fill participation metrics, they will sit on one site for hours. And our solution is to keep the unsafe pseudo kids park online while handing power to faceless corps who we are to trust with our private and identifiable data? Roblox for example is an open pedo network targeting kids, this won't be fixed. The sad truth is many children are encountering sexual content through these online play grounds made for kids.

[-] Chakravanti@monero.town 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Blaming is literally just relabeling the excuse to do what they accuse you of "not doing" while actually brainwashing anyone not paying attention.

Usually because they just left their third job and are driving to their first. Apparently they all forgot what to sleep was and never woke the fuck up. Pun intended.

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

"This isn't the end of a battle," he said. "This is the beginning of one."

I love that line so much, it goes hard and is kinda punk as fuck.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 7 points 1 day ago

Dicks are going to destroy the internet, regardless of pr0n.

[-] Yezzey@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

We have the dark web as backup.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

It was porn watching that initially pushed the internet technology to be better. Everything comes full circle.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 239 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Age verification isn't really age verification: it's identity verification. And once you have given your identity to one or two websites, data brokers will ensure that all your other activity on the internet will eventually be tied to it. Burner devices and anonymous VPNs could help, but only until those become illegal too.

This will have a chilling effect on not only every kind of discourse the fascists hate, but also political organization and people's ability to resist. You won't be able to organize a protest online without the police knowing in advance who is likely to come and finding a pretext to intimidate or pre-arrest them.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

or we could just ban their ip range from every website idk

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It literally only* affects corporate websites.

I knew what you meant to say, and now I'm left wondering how clumsy my fingers must be if I can accurately read a typo where 75% of the letters are wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] notannpc@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

The very instant a website wants me to verify my age by providing PII, I’ll just blacklist that website from my network. There isn’t a single website that I can’t go without.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 day ago

Until they ban Tor there will always be porn available.

This isn't about protecting children.

[-] FE80@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

This isn’t about protecting children.

This is about narrative control on the internet.

[-] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

You dare argue with the Ministry of Truth?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago

Remember, according to the UK government you're legally able to have sex, give birth, choose your future, and (soon?) vote at 16. Heaven forfend if you see a pair of titties though, you're not mature enough for that...

[-] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago

You can have sex, but you better not look!

I'm not against a bit of spice, but blindfolds at 16 just seem a little advanced. Especially when sex at that age is akin to a oblong peg in a tesseract shaped hole of unknown location.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
590 points (98.4% liked)

privacy

5907 readers
260 users here now

Big tech and governments are monitoring and recording your eating activities. c/Privacy provides tips and tricks to protect your privacy against global surveillance.

Partners:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS