Absolutely ghoulish. But I suppose, if you’re on board with apartheid and genocide, propaganda is an easy step.
Geopolitics at work, as ugly as it is. Diplomacy and Peace are all but impossible at this point, unless a miracle or three happens.
**Hamas is too ingrained and supported in Palestine to stop attacking Israel.
Israel too much in a blood rage and conquest to stop their assault on Palestine.**
Calling for calm or the end of the violence will hardly stop or improve anything, and more than likely show how ineffective America is. Let alone aggravating all sides.
So......they stay quiet and see how things play out whilst managing things the best they can. Biden has called to help civilians, so at least there's that.
I don't see this ending unless all of Palestine or Israel is gone.
Solid take, hadn't thought of that. Talk of “de-escalation/ceasefire,” “end to violence/bloodshed” and “restoring calm”, is utterly useless, for the reasons you outlined.
Talking like that is a lose/lose proposition. What's to gain? Might as well STFU, do your best, see how it goes.
It's lose/lose unless you consider the humanitarian outcome to have value. Which is kind of the main thing, isn't it?
Israel is emboldened by U.S. support. Materially, ideologically. I forget the figure for annual U.S. military aid to Israel but if I recall it's 20-30 billion. The U.S. government has probably the single greatest influence on Israel, so frankly they bear great responsibility for the outcome here.
Frankly, this memo is disgusting. And it would have been virtually unchanged in a GOP administration, save that we wouldn't even have the single word Biden said in defense of Palestinians. It's just a glimpse into the bizarre preoccupation the U.S. government has in remaining complicit in perpetuating this conflict, in favor of the Israeli side.
The funding certainly matters (even though it mostly goes back to US corporations), but this isn't talking about the funding.
This is talking about saying useless words and watering down the influence of the US. It's nice to say "deescalation" and "end of bloodshed", but unless those words are likely to happen, it's worse than nothing. It means when and if there IS ever a chance for peace, we'll have spent years calling wolf.
This is simply "don't say useless platitudes".
I don't think so, they'd be free to use them if they aligned with their goals.
There is one condition that will only delay this. Giving up the hostages will buy time for Hamas. But, you are on point it seems to me.
Gross.
OFC not. The US backs Israel even when they're committing war crimes. Controlling "the Muslim problem" in the region was always the point of the US backing Israel... Not that it's right. The US does fucked up things ... rather often.
It was never about the “Muslim problem” either. It’s about destabilizing the region to exploit it for oil. If (say) Mosaddegh had not been assassinated to allow British (and American) oil companies to keep drilling for oil, Iran’s successful rejection of the west might have led to other mostly secular and socialist leaders taking power in the Arab world, and generally rejecting western power.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News