586
You must be good at Math (programming.dev)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jerry584@programming.dev 4 points 6 days ago

You are right man

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 83 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

tbf all good programmers are good at math. Not classic arithmetic necessarily, but at the very least applied calculus. It's a crime how many people used a mathematical discipline every day, but don't think they're "good at math" because of how lazer focused the world is on algebra, geometry and trig as being all that "math" is.

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

Serious question; how does Calculus apply to programming? I’ve never understood.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

PID control is the classic example, but at a far enough abstraction any looping algorithm can be argued to be an implementation of the concepts underpinning calculus. If you're ever doing any statistical analysis or anything in game design having to do with motion, those are both calculus too. Data science is pure calculus, ground up and injected into your eyeballs, and any string manipulation or Regex is going to be built on lambda calculus (though a very correct argument can be made that literally all computer science is built of lambda calculus so that might be cheating to include it)

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lambda calculus has no relation to calculus calculus, though.

Data science is pure calculus, ground up and injected into your eyeballs

Lol, I like that. I mean, there's more calculus-y things, but it's kind of unusual in that you can't really interpret the non-calculus aspects of a neural net.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] expr@programming.dev 17 points 1 week ago

Graphics programming is the most obvious one and it uses it plenty, but really any application that can be modeled as a series of discrete changes will mostly likely be using calculus.

Time series data is the most common form of this, where derivatives are the rate of change from one time step to the next and integrals are summing the changes across a range of time.

But it can even be more abstract than that. For example, there's a recent-ish paper on applying signal processing techniques (which use calculus themselves, btw) to databases for the purposes of achieving efficient incremental view maintenance: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.16684

The idea is that a database is a sequence of transactions that apply a set of changes to said database. Integrating gets you the current state of the database by applying all of the changes.

[-] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 week ago

that can't be right. maybe they meant lambda calculus? programmers are definitely good at applied logic, graph theory, certain kinds of discrete math etc. but you're not whipping out integrals to write a backend.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Any function that relies on change over a domain is reliant on concepts that are fundementally calculus. Control systems, statistical analysis, data science, absolutely everything in networking that doesn't involve calling people on the phone to convince them to give you their password, that is all calculus.

[-] expr@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago

Many things that work with time series data use calculus all the time. Both derivatives and integrals are very useful in that context: derivatives being the rate of change at some particular time step, and integrals being the sum of the changes across a range of time steps.

There's a pretty wide range of applications.

Computers are just big calculators so to program them you need calculus.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

A senior firmware engineer said to the group that we just have to integrate the acceleration of an IMU to get velocity. I said “plus a constant.” I was fired for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 64 points 1 week ago

If you want to know how computers work, do electrical engineering. If you want to know how electricity works, do physics. If you want to know how physics works, do mathematics. If you want to know how mathematics works, too bad, best you can do is think about the fact it works in philosophy.

[-] bombadil@programming.dev 7 points 6 days ago
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago

Everything is philosophy until it becomes science. Unless it's anything to do with politics then it just remains philosophy forever.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 6 days ago

Science is a subdiscipline of philosophy.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 week ago

If you want to know how philosophy works, do sociology...

It's kind of like a horseshoe with philosophy and math at the ends.

[-] janus2@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you want to no longer want to know how anything works, do biochemistry

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] invictvs@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago
[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 39 points 1 week ago

Depends on the context. When my company proposes me to a client for work I am, but oddly during my yearly performance review I am just some smuck who programs.

[-] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 30 points 1 week ago

I’m something of a scientist myself

[-] StrixUralensis@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean, nowadays you need to be very smart and educated to google efficiently and avoid all the AI traps, missinformation, stackoverflow mods tripping, reading reddit threads on an issue with half the comments deleted because of the APIcalypse etc... sooo you could argue that you're somewhat of a scientist yourself

[-] ronigami@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Had a discussion with my 8yo niece the other day… turned out the lesson was, sometimes it can be worse to know the wrong thing than to know nothing at all.

[-] wuffah@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

If a C- is enough to pass Analysis of Algorithms, then a Computer Science degree can make me a Computer Scientist. :P

[-] f314@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

You need C++ for computer science, though!

[-] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Had a graduate Dev who did not have a fucking clue about anything computer related. How tf he passed his degree I have no idea.

Basic programming principles? No clue. Data structures? Nope.

We were once having a discussion about the limitations of transistors and dude's like "what's a transistor?" ~_~#

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Tbh, as a dev knowledge of transistors is about as essential as knowledge about screws for a car driver.

It's common knowledge and in general maybe a little shameful to not know, but it's really not in any way relevant for the task at hand.

[-] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Maybe for dev knowledge, but computer science? The science of computers?

[-] Euphoma@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

What kind of cs degree did you get where you learned about electrical circuits. The closest to hardware I've learned is logic circuit diagrams and verilog.

[-] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

I mean, I graduated over 20 years ago now, but I had to take a number of EE courses for my CS major. Guess that isn't a thing now, or in a lot of places? Just assumed some level of EE knowledge was required for a CS degree this whole time.

[-] PraiseTheSoup@midwest.social 9 points 1 week ago

I got my BS in CSci about 15 years ago and it was 100% about programming in java. We didn't learn a fucking thing about hardware and my roommate was an EE major and we had none of the same classes except for calculus.

By the time I graduated java was basically dead. Thanks state college.

[-] Lehmanator@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago

My CS program had virtually no programming outside a couple of courses where C was used to implement concepts. Had one applications type course where mostly Java was used.

CS is and should be a specialized math curriculum IMO. Teaching specific programming languages is time that would be better spent teaching theory that can't be taught by dev docs or code bootcamps, as exemplified by your anecdote. Unfortunately nowadays people tend to see degrees as glorified job training programs.

[-] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah, EE and CS had a lot of cross over where I went. At least in undergrad, grad school saw them diverge a lot more, but they still never disentangled, parts of each were important to both. Hell we had stuff like A+ labs, and shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Well, computer science is not the science of computers, is it? It's about using computers (in the sense of programming them), not about making computers. Making computers is electrical engineering.

We all know how great we IT people are at naming things ;)

[-] Lehmanator@programming.dev 2 points 6 days ago

Computational theory would be a better name, but it overlaps with a more specific subset of what is normally called CS.

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

We could also just call it Software Engineering. That's at least the job everyone gets with a Computer Science degree.

[-] MBM@lemmings.world 9 points 1 week ago

Informatics is a much better name imo

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

looks weird without the clevage

[-] handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

Be me, a computer scientist who still struggles with XOR.

[-] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 10 points 1 week ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago

I literally have no idea what this picture means, and at this point I'm too afraid to ask.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I have been coding since I was 10 years old. I have a CS degree and have been in professional IT for like 30 years. Started as a developer but I’m primarily hardware and architecture now. I have never ever said I was a computer scientist. That just sounds weird.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OR3X@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

IT stooge != science Sorry fellas.

[-] Spesknight@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

"Engineer of Information", please 😎

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Surely you must be a master of linear algebra and Euclidean geometry

[-] mattyroses@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah, we do both numbers here, ones AND zeros

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
586 points (98.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

26148 readers
421 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS