submitted 1 month ago by bterwijn@programming.dev to c/python@programming.dev

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

There's also a gotcha with default parameters:

def fun(a = []):
    a += [1]
    return a

fun()
print(fun()) # [1, 1]

issues I had with the tool you linked

I tried to make a link to this code in this visual debugger, but a link is made broken and can't be used without urlencoding spaces (I guess). Also the tool doesn't produce visual output in DuckDuckGo browser on Android

[-] bterwijn@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

You can just write your code and then press "Get URL" to get the link: https://memory-graph.com/#code=def+fun%28a+%3D+%5B%5D%29%3A%0A++++a+%2B%3D+%5B1%5D%0A++++return+a%0A%0Afun%28%29%0Aprint%28fun%28%29%29+%23+%5B1%2C+1%5D

DuckDuckGo problem, thanks for reporting.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I wrote code and pressed get URL, but then I copied what was shown in the window

The clipboard content:

https://memory-graph.com/#code=+%23+What+is%2Bthe+output+of+this+Python+program%3F%0A+++%0Adef+fun%28a+%3D+%5B%5D%29%3A+%0A++++a+%2B%3D+%5B1%5D%0A++++return+a%0Afun%28%29+print%28fun%28%29%29

The window text:

The following URL has been copied to your clipboard with:

    The current code
    Set breakpoints
    Playback timestep
    Play/Pause state

https://memory-graph.com/#code=+%23+What+is+the+output+of+this+Python+program? +++ def+fun(a+=+[]):+ ++++a++=+[1] ++++return+a fun()+print(fun())

The latter doesn't work, and I didn't think of checking the former

[-] bterwijn@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thanks for reporting, should be fixed now.

[-] lascapi@jlai.lu 5 points 1 month ago

Wow, nice project!  I'm a 'visual person', I understand better when I see what's happening.

That can help me a lot! :)

[-] bterwijn@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

Thanks, glad it helps you.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

As I would expect. Does the result surprise people?

If so, rename the arguments to fun() to be r, s, t, and u. Just inside the function. Does the obvious two scopes now make it clearer?

[-] shape_warrior_t@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago

The fact that x += y modifies lists in place might be surprising if you're expecting it to be exactly equivalent to x = x + y.

[-] bterwijn@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

Yes, that is a surprise to many, in other languages 'x+=y' and 'x=x+y' are the same.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

To be fair, I had to read the linked question on SO to understand what was the possible alternative. I do expect that if I use += it is in place.

On the other hand with Python and Java I always keep forgetting if everything is by value or by reference, I really miss some extra clarity of the languages where you can see if something is mutable when passed to a function

[-] 5C5C5C@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

Looks like this whole post is an ad for someone's project. The links hardly have to do with the post.

[-] bterwijn@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The "Solution" link gives the solution to the exercise, the "Explanation" link explains the Python data model concepts behind the exercise. If some parts are hard to understand let me know.

[-] logging_strict@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago

Yeah and the link went to a site with in-browser remote code execution. Dodgy.

Clicking Play or GetURL did nothing.

Luckily my browser is as old as me. And was too grumpy to actually do what it's told.

[-] NostraDavid@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Structlog actually bit me like this! Had a dict that I manipulated:

expectation spoilers

expected a copy, but actually modified the original dict. Just did a my_dict.copy() (IIRC - I don't remember whether I needed a deep copy or not)

edit: goeie shit, Bas! Leer je de studenten wel debuggen en unit testing? Dat was echt gemis toen ik klaar was bij de HU, en vooral unit testen zou veel hebben geholpen tijdens het maken van mijn code.

[-] logging_strict@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Here is the link to the code which is being in-browser remote executed

exercise14.py

There is no "explanation" next to or within the file. A exercise14.rst or test_exercise14.py would be nice.

The Explanation link provided contains a mountain of visual shit (aka noise) none of which looks like exercise14.py code.

The OP is trying to teach us, i get that. Looks like i'm failing the (mountain of visual shit) reading comprehension section of this exercise.

[-] bterwijn@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thanks for your feedback, much appriciated.

I agree that an exercise14.rst would be nice, but to save time I've let the code speak for itself now together with the visualizaion. I'll probably revisit and better document the exercises later.

At the Explanation link I try to give a general explanation about Pyrhon mutability (and copy later on), I agree some readers might find it hard to relate that to a specific exercise, but I don't want to write a specific explanation for each exercise.

[-] logging_strict@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

First i love the visualizations. It grew on me. And supportive of coding challenges posts. As long as there isn't a flood of them. Which there isn't.

I get your position. That there just isn't an explanation for each and every exercise. The other comments made it seemed like there was.

When i clicked on the Explanation link, the browser didn't initially scroll to the Mutability section. Went downhill from there.

btw i'm too dumb to know the answer and too lazy to copy+paste the code into a REPR.

All the other commenters are just dishonest pretending they totally got it without running the code ;-)

[-] bterwijn@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Actually running the code? I got to the stage where only AI can help me understand anything ;-)

[-] logging_strict@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Ah! Haven't yet reached stubborn old geezer stage.

Don't immediately understand exactly what the code does? Must be cuz of mental slippage. Like brain plague or residual PHP or jinja2 knowhow that can't be purged.

We all know it's not from drug use or excessive party lifestyle. Maybe excessive retro Linux gaming?

Whatever it is, those exercises are great diagnosis tool.