16
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

Tucker thinks about gay sex more than most gay men.

[-] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

“This is the way.”

[-] xyzzy@lemmy.today 10 points 1 week ago

Shall we conclude that Pete turned down Tucker's advances

Tucker was simply fake hitting on Pete to test if Pete was truly gay or not, obviously.

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Tucker: Pete wouldn’t let me stuck his dick. Definitely not gay.

Tucker truly is a penetrative journalist.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Wait. This isn't the Onion?

[-] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

wow, Pete's turn getting his skull measured came sooner than I thought. I thought they'd get rid of the racial minorities first

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

"I'd need like ... specific details. Maybe even use my name in place of your partner... You'd have to draw some pictures too, or better yet take photos. Lots of photos."

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

lmao

He added that if he ever interviews Buttigieg, “I’m gonna ask him very specific questions about gay sex and see if he can even answer. I doubt he even knows. You’re not gay, dude. Stop.”

Wait, is tucker in the epstein files?

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

I fucking hate the rat, but this is when you gotta hit them with the 'weird'

[-] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Tucker, you need to learn to move on when your love interest won't go out with you.

[-] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago

TELL ME ABOUT GAY SEX DAMN IT! DESCRIBE IT TO ME IN VIVID DETAIL! LEAVE NOTHING OUT!

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

My aunt is transphobic and explained the surgeries to me in vivid detail. She was trying to convince me it was somehow wrong because it was disgusting and I was just like "why do you know all this?". She claims to be so disgusted by it but went out of her way to research it.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago

Show her a video of a knee replacement surgery.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Tucker: "So, say you and I were in bed, what, SPECIFICALLY, would you do... SPECIFICALLY. I mean leave nothing out."

[-] wuffah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I’ve met seemingly normal people who think Tucker Carlson is a real political commentator with good ideas.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

After he literally argued in court that no reasonable person would believe anything he says is true.

[-] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago

Maybe they have him confused with Chris Tucker. I can see the resemblance.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Ridiculous broadcaster. It matches.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Tucker Carlson makes Ruby Rhod look like Walter Cronkite.

[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Is Tucker Carlson gatekeeping gayness?

[-] JaymesRS@piefed.world -1 points 1 week ago

To be fair, a lot of people including those on the far left were gatekeeping gayness during the 2020 primary. It’s not new for Buttigieg.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I hope Pete calls Tucker’s bluff because I am extremely curious what specific knowledge the latter has about gay sex that the former can confirm.

[-] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Haha, I was wondering what he would even ask.

[-] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] Bonje@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Bro just wants to take notes.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Vigorously and with mounting fervor.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

F Tucker!

But also, Dems shouldn't run Wall Street Pete...

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

No one should be seriously quoting Brianna Joy Gray. She lost all credibility when she and Jimmy Dore advocated for that ridiculous "Force the Vote" bullshit, a few years ago. She has about all the political acumen of a rubber mallet.

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25594 readers
409 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS