209

Apple has called for the European Commission to repeal a swathe of technology legislation, warning that unless it is amended the company could stop shipping some products and services to the 27-country bloc.

The Silicon Valley company hit out in a submission to the commission’s review of the three-year-old anti-monopoly legislation, which is intended to regulate the gatekeeper power of the largest digital companies including search engines, app providers and messaging services.

It said it had already delayed the launch of features such as live translation through AirPods and mirroring iPhone screens on to laptop because of the act’s demands for interoperability with non-Apple products and services.

“The DMA means the list of delayed features in the EU will probably get longer, and our EU users’ experience on Apple products will fall further behind,” it said. Apple added that Brussels was creating unfair competition as the rules were not applied to Samsung, the largest smartphone provider in the EU.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] meliodas_101@lemmy.world 130 points 1 week ago

Do it stop shipping.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 84 points 1 week ago

obvious bluff is obvious

[-] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 53 points 1 week ago

They would never stop selling their products in Europe lol. And if they did, I wouldn’t care, even though I own a few Apple products.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, we don't really have systemic/infrastructure dependency on Apple. Compared to Microsoft who does & can and does extort the EU a bit where it can.

That's why foss all the things!

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

At least Germany is starting to move away from MS

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LordOfLocksley@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

Don't threaten me with a good time Apple.

It's just empty threats though. The EU market is bigger than America (considering population sizes only), there is no way they'd give up on that

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 17 points 1 week ago

Given android id more popular in Europe than America, you could say apple is behind in market share, so providing less features is not a great business plan.

[-] mesamunefire@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm sure fairphone would love this senario.

I can only hope that a 3rd os rises to compete with google and apple. A true Linux phonebwould be a huge boon.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Apple is such a piece of shit company.

Learn how to compete without behaving anti competitively or quit your fucking jobs. It's not complicated.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Yep. Although that is the only way they've ever operated. They will never change without the force of law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sacredbirdman@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 week ago

Cool, stop shipping the walled garden shit then.

[-] devolution@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

Apple wouldn't stop. They need that money too much. Also, Europe is OK with going Huawei if Google and Apple keep up with their shit.

[-] NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

Came here to say the same. It's an empty threat. After all this is famously the company who made dual physical SIM iPhones for China and other Asian regions because eSIM isn't/wasn't legal.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago

And zero SIM in America so they can force their controlling narrative rather than consumer choice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 24 points 1 week ago

Am I misreading this or are their arguments all complete nonsense? From what I can see in the article they have:

  1. They have to allow third-party headphones, i.e. the anti-monopoly policy prevents a monopoly.

Among the requirements of the DMA is that Apple ensures that headphones made by other brands will work with iPhones. It said this has been a block on it releasing its live translation service in the EU as it allows rival companies to access data from conversations, creating a privacy problem.

  1. Other companies will "twist laws" to prevent competition, i.e. exactly what Apple is trying to do by removing regulation. I don't see any way to interpret this other than an outright lie, anti-monopoly policies encourage competition.

Apple said that under the DMA, “instead of competing by innovating, already successful companies are twisting the law to suit their own agendas – to collect more data from EU citizens, or to get Apple’s technology for free”.

  1. Porn exists? I don't even know what they're trying to say with this one?

It said that rules under the act affected the way it provided users access to apps. “Pornography apps are available on iPhone from other marketplaces – apps we’ve never allowed on the App Store because of the risks they create, especially for children,” it said.

[-] traceur201@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago

the absurdity of their claims is how you can tell it's working. we need more of it acsoss the board

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago

Am I misreading this or are their arguments all complete nonsense?

Its apple ... what did you expect? They have always been like this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

Apple sold well over $10 billion worth of Iphones in the EU in 2024, but rather than deal with the annoyance of EU regulation they're just going to take their ball and go home.

They must think EU regulators are imbeciles.

[-] crimsonpoodle@pawb.social 8 points 1 week ago

Or they think the people in the EU will do mass protests if they don’t get their product— forcing the regulators hands; maybe because of what happened with tiktok in Nepal— missing the nuance of the political and economic factors there however.

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And Apple shareholders will revolt if Apple revenues drop by $10 billion because they're having a tantrum. I hope EU regulators call Apple's bluff. The U.S. is a corporate hellscape, the EU doesn't have to be.

[-] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Oh no! How will I ignore their products now?

[-] furycd001@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

Knowing Apple, they’ll probably find a way to ‘comply’ that feels more like a loophole than a solution....

[-] egrets@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I like my iPhone. It's solid hardware and reasonably capable software. It does everything I need it to do, and gives me really solid control over API access to privacy-centric controls like location and microphone.

I still wouldn't skip a beat to switch to another phone manufactured by another company (though I regret how much of a duopoly there is). The inconvenience is minor; Apple just needs to give me a shove and I'll switch.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Yeah I'm sure Apple's going to give up on half a billion potential customers. Sure.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Hey Apple... Fuck you

[-] tunetardis@piefed.ca 12 points 1 week ago

Among the requirements of the DMA is that Apple ensures that headphones made by other brands will work with iPhones. It said this has been a block on it releasing its live translation service in the EU as it allows rival companies to access data from conversations, creating a privacy problem.

I'm not really understanding this. Where is the privacy problem? What is different with airpods that solves this? At the end of the day, are they not just bluetooth headphones? Do they add some extra security layer beyond what bluetooth itself offers?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I remember when apple used to reverse engineer microsoft software.. :/

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

"If you don't let us misbehave, we're gonna cut off like a good 4th of our market share"

[-] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

Don’t threaten us with a good time Apple!

[-] themurphy@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

They need us (our money). We dont even like them enough to not replace them the second they go away.

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

Please stop shipping to anywhere.

[-] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Our overlords from Brussels are fucking pussies rn. They want to monitor our messages and verify everything. And they also want to ban privacy coins for some reason.

[-] mrslt@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Be pretty funny if Europe just banned them instead.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I give a fuck, I anyway prefer to lick ny belly before buying something from Apple.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] J52@lemmy.nz 8 points 1 week ago

, lol, good riddance.

[-] django@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago

Good idea, safari sucks.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

That was always allowed

[-] oyzmo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Big tech only cares about money, something that makes them very predictable. Very high fines and banning costs them money, so they will comply to all demands to avoid. Easy as that :)

[-] t_var_s@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

We should pay attention as alternatives are dwindling. Google wants Android to be more like iOS, you may not have as much freedom of choice as you think you do.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Better to have fewer alternatives that are not coercive monopolies that a few more which are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

Who cares? The average EU citizen will benefit far more from the regulation. I don't think any of their laws have been bad so far, mostly requiring standard connectors, requiring user access to install what they want without apples permission, and monopolizing software stores in general. This might be a great opportunity to actually get some consumer friendly competition out of Europe for once. Also Samsung already allows third party app stores, has USB C like every other modern device, and allows side loading. It's going to get interesting once Google starts complaining that they can't control users devices after they buy them as well with their upcoming ban on non Google approved software installations.

[-] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 week ago

demands for interoperability with non-Apple products

the rules were not applied to Samsung

I wonder if Samsung owns a walled garden where their products aren't interoperable with those from other manufacturers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] falseWhite@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

They're just bluffing, they'd lose more money by withdrawing from the EU market, than finding ways to comply. Greedy corporations are easy to predict, since their only goal is money and they don't do things "out of principle".

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 week ago

Just the evil nature of a megacorp manifesting in monology tenancies.

Anti-monopoly laws are at most too loose atm, not too strict.

(Also the threat is just a threat, they've been saying that for a decade now.)

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Apple hardware has never been more boring, one iterative release after another. They rely on software and services to lock users in.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
209 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

39918 readers
150 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS