89

This way, when the pendulum swings in the other direction and they try to take advantage of us again by showing their support, we can point to the record and show people that it's not sincere.

We shouldn't allow them to play both sides of the fence like this.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Butterbee@beehaw.org 26 points 3 days ago

I don't think it's particularly helpful. It doesn't matter which companies do or don't. NONE of them are our friends. Ever.

[-] manxu@piefed.social 9 points 3 days ago

I don't mean to be contrarian, but I do want to point to lots of queer-owned businesses that truly mean it when they celebrate the community!

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 11 points 3 days ago

They're still businesses and after they go public or are sold they will follow business rules.

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 days ago

The be all, end all of businesses isn't always to go public. Neither does the ownership structure of all businesses facilitate it, some are co-operatives. It would also be really hard for a business that exclusively deals in products for queer people, like a binder company, to just drop their only market.

[-] huppakee@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

Even when that's true, it still means they are genuinely supporting the gay community right now. An ally behaving imperfectly doesn't make them an enemy.

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago
[-] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Queer owned businesses aren't ones that 99.9% of people interact with on a daily basis. I doubt there are 5 queer owned businesses that are publicly traded.

[-] JillyB@beehaw.org 6 points 3 days ago

It wouldn't be queer owned if it was publicly traded. It would be owned by shareholders.

[-] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

That's a load of shit. Being queer owned doesn't preclude you from capitalism.

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago

I'm sorry, but what exactly is a load of shit about the above statement? Capitalism =/= publicly traded. For a business to be both publicly traded, and queer owned, there would have to be some sort of covenant preventing shares from being sold to non-queer people. I don't think that would actually be legal?

[-] onslaught545@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 days ago

Capitalism and publicly traded are like 3 sides of the same coin.

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago

Uhm, what? Like, come on, I hate capitalism as much as the next queer person, but you're just spouting nonsense. Twitter isn't publicly-traded, does that mean it doesn't participate in capitalism?

[-] onslaught545@lemmy.zip -2 points 3 days ago

Do you have an actual question there?

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

Nope, from the first reply I was mainly calling you out for rudely saying something untrue. I think you're just turning your hatred for capitalism against other queer people, and I think that behaviour sucks.

[-] onslaught545@lemmy.zip -3 points 3 days ago

You're significantly misunderstanding me, but that's fine since I won't support trans people anymore since you think I'm an enemy.

Might as well be the person I'm portrayed as instead of the person who wants trans people to survive as long as possible.

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago

...that's fine since I won't support trans people anymore since you think I'm an enemy.

If it was apparently this easy for you to stop supporting trans people, then you never did to begin with. No idea where all this came from though, seems you just have a bee in your bonnet (haha, get it? because we're on beehaw).

[-] JillyB@beehaw.org 3 points 3 days ago

I truly dont understand this comment.

Bad management is still a thing. And I'm not against using the levers of capitalism to force businesses to be queer-accepting and prove that queer-phobic managers are incompetent from their numbers.

This isn't a replacement for taking down capitalism, but still a tiny victory.

[-] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago
[-] diffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Maybe this is my bias but I think they find a job easily after the things cooled down.

[-] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 days ago

Are they actually, though?

It's not 100% bulletproof, but what is?

I'm viewing it like climate change -- every little bit counts.

[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If you want to not forget as a personal principle, it'd be easier for you to note the ones who aren't rolling back their support. It'll be a smaller list.

But doing this to show people that it's not sincere is probably unnecessary at this point. Pinkwashing has been going on for over a decade by now at minimum. If you're dealing with "convince people corporations shouldn't be taken at their word regarding queer rights" as a goal and existing history/arguments don't suffice, you're probably dealing with someone who's either one of the lucky 10,000 or someone who isn't willing to be convinced at all.

[-] se7enfeet@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 days ago

Not true! Some never had any.

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago

The weirdest thing I saw last year was a Tesla from an official dealer with a Pride flag wrap, as though their CEO wasn't actively engaged in a transphobic political campaign. They really DGAF where the money comes from as long as it keeps flowing.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's never been sincere. Corporations aren't your friend.

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
89 points (98.9% liked)

LGBTQ+

7025 readers
213 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS