1143

Expecting heavy industry greenwashing of this (slrpnk.net)

submitted 2 days ago by socialistpartyca@slrpnk.net to c/memes@slrpnk.net

264 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 hours ago

It's not even just about sustainability. It's also largely about comfort (public transport is just 10x as comfortable as any car could be), price to the end consumer (public transport is typically much cheaper to the end consumer than cars, and that's even by a lot), space management (compare how much space cars need vs. public transport) and all these things. it's not just climate change.

[-] Aganim@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

public transport is just 10x as comfortable as any car could be

Yes, nothing beats walking to a bus stop and waiting there in the cold, rain or burning sun, hoping the bus shows up in time or at all. Then stressing, because it being 15 minutes late probably means your connecting train will be gone. Oh yes, there it goes. Half an hour wait with no place to sit. And then repeat this two more times for more connecting trains and buses.

And I haven't even talked about not being able to sit during train rides, or having to sit on back wrecking seats. Unfortunately I have back issues and after having enjoyed the 'comfort' of our public transport I often end up just not being able to stand or sit anymore at the end of the day because my back hurts so bad.

That is my average commute, and as a bonus there ultimately isn't a difference in price here between taking the car or public transport. To top it off my average travel time is 60 minutes by car, 1.5 - 2 hours by public transport, often depending whether or not the first bus shows up in time.

It would be able to overlook a lot of this if it was feasible to do some work in the train, but with all the fragmentation on my route I never really get anything done.

I really would like to use public transport, as it is more sustainable than my gas guzzler, but each time I try it the experience just sucks so bad.

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

... Have you ever used public transportation in any major city? It is about the only instance in modern age where you are in a vehicle that may be going 50 kph and you are standing. If you are going to be making claims, I would drop that "10x as comfortable" bit.

Comfortable is probably the biggest reason most people don't use public transportation. With their own cars, they don't need to wait, they don't need to worry about whether they are going to be packed like sardines because of the work rush, or forced to even wait for another pass because it got full before they were able to get on, or have to worry about getting cramps from not being able to sit, or having the transit take significantly more because it's not direct, or pickpockets..

About the only comfortable thing about public transport is if you can get on it during off-peak hours when seats are available, in a route that doesn't require a lot transfers, that isn't much longer due to the stops and side-routing, and that doesn't have a high wait time. All the stars have to align.

In comparison, bikes are probably the better option overall, and it would be epic if public transport started incorporating e-bike/scooter transit along with it. Unfortunately it seems to be quite the opposite where I live due to concerns about Lithium battery fires, but hopefully someone somewhere realizes that that is just a standardization issue.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago

I'm with you entirely except for comfort. I think the only comfort advantage is that trains can have comparable leg room and you can standup.

I have never been on any type of mass transit where the seats were as comfortable as even a crappy car.
That's ignoring system dependent stuff like cleanliness or the discomforts of being close to strangers.

You can certainly clean more, put in better seats, and suck it up when it comes to strangers, but as it is right now, I struggle to see how you could say it's more comfortable based purely on the amenities.

[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 hours ago

I struggle to see how you could say it’s more comfortable

easy, i don't have to focus on the street for 50 minutes. that's a big win for me.

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

It's amazing how much it takes for some to reach the conclusion that systemic change is both necessary and requires... systemic change. As in systems changing. As in greater change than your individual decision to ride an EV or ICEV or public transit. Change that would make it exponentially more intuitive for you to choose the most sustainable one of those options.

Especially if mass transit is not feasible for you, this post is not to shame you or call on you to try and do it anyways. It's a recognition that riding mass transit is not feasible or intuitive for most people, and a call to make mass transit available to more people rather than investing all that time and energy into the wild goose chase of EV adoption.

The crying indian really did a number on us.

[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I have Reduced my car/bike usage. I'm still a hobby driver/motorcyclist but I do it less nowadays.

All my vehicles are bought second hand and will be Reused until I can't fix them anymore. They're both mid 00's Hondas (car and bike) so that's likely going to be until I run out of parts on the market.

Then they will be Recycled for scrap metal. At that point I'll think about Reusing some other second hand car. If electric makes sense it'll be that.

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 8 points 21 hours ago

Horses are even more sustainable and renewable. And tasty if done right.

[-] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 4 points 19 hours ago

It's great to see that Skeletor and all his "likes" will be switching from gas cars to public transit.

[-] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Yeah in a world where transit isnt a shit show. In my city transit will take you 2 hours to get home when a car will take 20 minutes

[-] valtia@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Then you better be advocating for better public transit

[-] bvoigtlaender@feddit.org 6 points 22 hours ago

That is true, which makes it so weird to get so much backlash from advocating for good transit in the first place.

Also driving by bike is often times overlooked. In my home town of 10k the supermarket has a us sized parking lot and is located right in the center... Its cheaper for you and others, healthier for you, others and the earth and its safer for others.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

It's not so much the advocating for good transit, it's the using it as an attack on EVs. There's no reason we can't have both.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago

I live in a small town. The town has a couple vans that old people can call to be driven to the doctor. And like all government services and social safety nets, it's gonna be gone by the time it's my turn. If I'm going somewhere, it's my car, my bike or my feet.

[-] Soleos@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Electric cars are a type of vehicle. Public transit is a type of transportation system that include many different types of vehicles and can include electric cars.

You're comparing apples to orchards.

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 4 points 17 hours ago

They aren't doing that, you are. The apples to apples comparison that they are making is our current transit system; with the cars being fully electrified but otherwise as it exists today; versus a transit system that prioritizes mass transit (and walking and biking) over personal vehicles.

Electric cars are a solution to save the auto industry, not the climate.

[-] Soleos@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Maybe in your bubble it's common parlance that "electric cars" = "electrifying mass private vehicle infrastructure", but from the outside, that's not a straightforward interpretation.

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

I'm just letting you know the most good faith interpretation of this post, in case you missed it. I'm not interested in arguing about "common parlance"

[-] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

What public transport?

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 3 points 17 hours ago

That's the problem they're pointing out.

[-] jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago

That's great if public transport goes from near where you are to near where you want to be, in a reasonable time.

For me that's not the case. Anywhere I want to go takes 27 changes over at least 5 hours for a net distance of three miles; it'd be quicker to hop backwards blindfold on a bent pogo stick.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

people who argue for public transport argue for better implementation of it (and also city planning that supports it). the idea isn't for everyone to just stop using cars in favor of public transport even if the public transport system is absolute shit. it's for systemic support of public transport in such a way that commuters would willingly choose it over being stuck in traffic in their little metal boxes for hours.

it's a criticism of the system, not the people.

[-] romanticremedy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

That's what decades of car centric urban design does to everyone; any transportation other than a car is treated as a second class

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

While there's something to that, it's also a difficult fact that rail is just harder than roads, and by extension more expensive. You have hills? You are going to need to do tunnels and bridges for the rail because you can't turn that sharply and you mustn't have more than 1.5% grade. For road, just snake it around and up and down the hills.

You have a source and destination that not many people will be using? It's cost prohibitive to run a whole train or bus to cover that route.

Now it's one thing when the population distribution was based around settling around the harsh realities of needing to be along viable transit paths, but when a great deal of the population settled with the assumption of roads, you are going to have a hard time sorting out transit routes without mass resettlement.

Of course, if you apply mass transit to cities and nearby areas you've gotten the worst of the troubles solved and it's viable for mass transit. But cars are just part of the equation for longer hauls.