103
submitted 1 day ago by CityPop@lemmy.today to c/world@quokk.au
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 60 points 1 day ago

Bribes and ideology determine supreme court cases.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 day ago

It's pure ideology.

The bribes are just to keep him from retiring.

[-] 0ndead@infosec.pub 52 points 1 day ago

Clarence Thomas is a traitor to this country

[-] shani66@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago

Frankly, we need someone that will use the new and expanded powers of the ~~king~~ ~~dictator~~ president to root out the traitors and reward them as traitors deserve, because they are legion.

[-] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

Literally every law in human history is "something somebody dreamt up and others went along with". That's how laws get made.

So he's basically saying laws don't matter to him and he will do whatever he wants whenever he wants to whomever he feels like.

Unless they give him a $300,000 motor coach that is. Then he'll do whatever you want baby ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[-] MisterCurtis@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

We, as citizens, really need a process to remove supreme court judges.

[-] talentedkiwi@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

I thought that was the 2nd amendment.

[-] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

2nd amendment was a farce to let the rich white men own guns to control the poors that couldn't afford it.

"Do as I say, not as I do"

As soon as the minorities take up guns, the 2nd will be superseded by some other law to make it criminal. See black panther.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

No shit, you corrupt basket of grundles.

[-] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

Precedent might not determine cases but you know what will? A new luxury RV!

[-] moody@lemmings.world 14 points 1 day ago

The centuries-established foundation of the US legal system might not determine cases on upcoming supreme court docket.

[-] f1error@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago
[-] itztalal@lemmings.world 1 points 1 day ago

I guess we can blame everyone who lied for why those telling the truth weren't automatically taken seriously.

[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

They may want to re-rule on every case they didn't like the ruling on and will then enforce it more stringently then any of the rulings they disagreed with, ever were. They are effectively pulling off a massive, foundational shift in how American political power functions and they will not give back any new powers they grant themselves.

[-] rayyy@piefed.social 1 points 21 hours ago

On the other hand a nice motor coach or all expense paid vacation will go a very long way in determining cases.

[-] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Go Fuck yourself Clarence Thompson…. That is all.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I suppose that's a good precedent should the future Supreme Court ever be un-compromised.

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
103 points (100.0% liked)

World News

769 readers
736 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person, don't post hate.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS