Yes, and building permits need to be denied if they don't include adequate plans for off-street parking.
This is actually already happening, and it has played out horribly in real life. This is what has caused our north american urban sprawl and has demolished most of our downtown areas. It hurts small businesses because they can't just open a cafe in a small town, now they also need to build parking next to it. It spreads everything out and makes car dependence worse. On top of that, there is no consensus on how much parking is "adequate".
This video is fascinating, and changed my perception of parking: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUNXFHpUhu8
Partially agree, but this inevitably leads to unaffordable rent when developers are forced to add an 8 spot parking garage in what was once zoned for a single family home which isn't economically feasible. Instead, they have to buy up multiple lots and put up a huge apartment building. This adds to upfront cost but it works due to it's scale; however, this also bars most home owners from legally adding more homes to their property while also making it more difficult for developers to add more desity by adding that much more upfront cost. Underground structures are hellah expensive.
The real issue here is over-reliance on motor-vehicles and under-performing public transit. There is a bus I have to take to get downtown from time to time, but what should be a bus lane is a parking lane after 5pm so it's always late and I'm pretty sure having a huge accordion bus weaving in and out of traffic every 2 blocks makes traffic worse.
I haven't owned a car in over ten years, so I don't need to take up that extra space to store a vehicle. I dream of living in a dense, car-free area that has a robust cycling network, trams, etc. Only service vehicles are allowed and the only parking spots are handicap. Of course, such a place doesn't exist in the north american continent, or any where really except maybe in the Netherlands.
You'll end up with less housing that way. Let alone the extra costs you're taxing on people who don't or cannot drive.
Flip the law around. Deny registering a car without proof of a parking spot. No spot for your car? No car for you.
I agree with this for long-term parking, but I'm not upset by occasional short term parking in the street. I can't really expect my neighbor's holiday guests to squeeze 4 cars into a one car driveway.
It also depends on the location I think. My street is extremely wide, so it's not a big deal. On narrow or crowded streets I would probably feel differently.
Shitty property planning with no off-street parking results in people needing to park on the street in a car centric city where you need a car to function.
Not city/property planning's fault tho, it's the people with no choice but to park on the street that are the problem!
/s
Ffs, sure there is the case of some dick parking outside your home, but the real problem is with city and property planning. Not the fault of individial owners by and large.
What about in a dead-end neighborhood?
See, I've got this plan, get one of those "POD" things, or really just a mock up, and put it in front of my house, just off the curb. BOOM! It's an extra room. Get some furniture. Have friends over for tea. Even maybe rent it out aerbnb style.
I was disagreeing with you (somewhat, depending on context) until you got to the part about people having more cars than they have driveway/garage space for. Oh yeah. In that scenario that's definitely a problem.
The worse one is people that have garages and don't use them. Then they complain when their car gets dented by hail.
Lol this is the most unhinged, flat out ignorant Karen shit I have ever heard. Definitely unpopular. Unpopular because it is wrong, but I guess it still works.
Nope, us urbanists are getting pretty tired of entitled people thinking they should get ~~free~~ taxpayer subsidized parking when there isn't enough room for all of the cars. City streets are some of the valuable land available and the city pays to maintain it, clean it, and hold it for private vehicles that do nothing to bring value to the neighborhood.
We saw during COVID how valuable that space could be. More walking space. Sidewalk cafes and outdoor dining. More space for people, not for cars.
If you want parking in a city then you should pay for it yourself. Either buy a home with a garage, pay to put it into a long term garage, or join the revolution of not using a car at all and push for better public transit instead. If my tax dollars should go anywhere, it's towards clean reliable transit instead of parking spaces for private vehicles.
I'm with OP. Public space belongs to the public, not to cars.
Unpopular Opinion
Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!
How voting works:
Vote the opposite of the norm.
If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.
Guidelines:
Tag your post, if possible (not required)
- If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
- If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].
Rules:
1. NO POLITICS
Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.
2. Be civil.
Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...
Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
5. No trolling.
This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.
6. Defend your opinion
This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/