Still can't believe the government has a banned word list for scientific reports.
They're just working up to banning science.
You mean banning ~~science~~ liberal shit talk non facts?
(how every conversation starts looking next year)
They have morons on both sides already eager to do that for them.
Remember when science could be debated? Now we just have to accept everything as fact without question if it supports the correct agenda.
Questioning science gets you banned, lol. It may as well be religion at that point.
Remember when science could be debated? Now we just have to accept everything as fact without question if it supports the correct agenda.
Questioning science gets you banned, lol. It may as well be religion at that point.
Questioning what science gets you banned from what, by whom? Scientists question science all the time. That's how it progresses. You'd need to give examples to explain what you're referring to. And can you give an example when we're expected to simply "accept everything as fact without question"?
Edit: It has been a day. I guess there are no examples coming.
That's literally not how science works or has ever worked
"Questioning science" is literally part of the scientific method. Every single scientist is constantly doing it.
If one side of a discussion on facts has data and the other has opinions what is there to debate?
I remember a time when hard data was debatable - it was ten minutes ago. We're trapped in a timeline where data is disregarded in favour of comfortable lies.
Why address climate change if one can instead engage in mass self-deception.
It's odd to me that they even have a banned words list to begin with
I'm not American but I know American academics and they have told me they are being pulled into meetings and given lists of words they must not use. So much for all the "free speech" whining from Republicans.
"Free speech" for republicans is just "I want to say the worst hateful, racist, bigoted shit out loud without repercussions"
"And punish you for daring to think about 'policing' me by calling me out."
Conservatives are, and have always been, about power over others. We kept their more evil nature's focused externally for a while with cold war, but without an external threat to point them at, they always turn on their neighbors eventually.
The government is owned by billionaires and they ban words that make line go up slower.
Whoever has the biggest bunker wins.
Imagine being so invested in bullshit that you have to censor any and all terms that contradict it.
Really, it's no wonder that Trump and his cronies and minions are so filled with rage - they're in a constant state of extreme cognitive dissonance.
And it makes sense in a way that they direct their rage at "woke" people and positions. From their limited, animalistic points of view, all they understand is that when they think of "woke," they're filled with rage. They aren't conscious enough to understand that the source of the rage isn't the positions or the people, but the cognitive dissonance they experience when they cling to their opposition to simple and obvious truths.
It has to be a miserable way to live, and if they weren't an existential threat to me, my family and friends, and society as a whole, I'd feel sorry for them.
his cronies and minions are so filled with rage - they're in a constant state of extreme cognitive dissonance.
And that will be their own undoing. Fascists are fully driven by emotions. They are anti-liberal and anti-intellect after all.
Climate unaliving
Y'all upset about all this... orbital heating? We really should reduce the amount of gassy leakages from cars and cows.
Too many car farts makes air go hot hot.
It looks like “global warming” and “pollution” are back in the menu, boys!
It was almost 90°F here today. You can't tell me global warming doesn't also fucking apply to climate change.
It doesn't matter what doublespeak they use, it's still happening
How can you be so obtuse? Do you not recall when a US Senator brought a snowball onto the floor of the senate to completely disprove this hoax?
Just like the time we had a minister bring a lump of "clean coal" into the Australian parliament.
Pretty neat demonstration of how the world beyond their viewpoint doesn't exist.
“Freeze peach” and all that.
Can't wait until enough people are upset that the guillotines come out.
are you gonna start us off?
I do genuinely wonder if America can survive this perfect storm of idiotic fascism.
They haven't had real dialog about real issues in 10 years. Time flies doesn't it. It was dead the moment they entered the Trump era. This idiotic fascism era.
I don't see how they're bringing 1/3rd to 2/3rds the population back to reality. It was over when that half the country reneged on the social contract.
Classic ministry of truth
I remember ten years ago you'd get mocked if you went round calling everything Orwellian, but it's crazy the sheer degree with which the GOP are using it as a guidebook.
Global hotting
Back to global warming?
World-wide uncoldification.
climate.nasa.gov still works, for now.
Shhh don't tell them
Good point.
Enemies of humankind
Planetary abuse repercussions is a more accurate label, I say let's use that in place.
The problem is that changing the name makes it much harder for people to find and collate evidence.
Wouldn't it be easier to just ban all reports, period? Problem solved.
Gonna make it illegal to look up next?
So would it now be considered acceptable to use something like " [INSERT FIRM] passed gas to the amount of [BLANK] tons over [PERIOD OF TIME] "
It sure would make reports a hell of alot more interesting.
What else is there to say but arm the workers
Organize the workers. Many are already armed but it doesn't help without organization.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.