344

Fuck Google with a stiff wire brush.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] redti@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago

This comes with trump and its another shot at us. Class warfare!

[-] somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 127 points 1 week ago

Here's why:

they are a greedy company

[-] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 113 points 1 week ago

Money is the reason. I don’t need to read the article to know.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago
[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

Thanks for the heads up, now I know not to open it

[-] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago
[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I only watched it, because it's on PeerTube.

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Its always the reason. Why is this thing shit? Because money greed.

[-] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I read somewhere that GrapheneOS devs have a strategy which they believe will work -- they strip out something or other about app/device attestation (?) from APK files before installing occurs, or the enforcement code itself from their spin of the OS, so sideloading (ie., user-controlled installation) can still work.

I sure hope so... I think everyone in their respective country needs to scream at their local regulators about this.

Of course, this will only help those whose devices GrapheneOS can run on.

[-] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 1 week ago

The GrapheneOS team is already in communications with an Android OEM to see if they can make a device that meets their specs, hopefully that bears fruit in a year or two.

[-] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

Do you have source to this?

[-] other8026@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Just check the project's X account. The OEM partnership is mentioned very regularly.

[-] jnod4@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago
[-] 211@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

Hope it's Fairphone.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] other8026@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago

Google has already shared how apps' developers will be verified. They're adding another app that will have access to block installing apps or disable them. That won't work on GrapheneOS because 1. the app won't be installed and 2. the app won't have that kind of privileged access.

[-] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago

ROFL we got redstarOS on mainstream phones before gta6

[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

I think the issue is new hardware and google starting to close source android, so that Graphene devs don't have the open source to work with. They'll probably get binary blobs

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] shaggyb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Soooo we just block that app, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago

And how long is it going to work?

Do we really want to play cat and mouse with Google? I don't.

[-] other8026@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

The way Google will block apps with unverified developers won't work on GrapheneOS. The change won't be part of AOSP. On the stock OS, the functionality will be handled by another Google app that has privileged access. GrapheneOS won't be affected directly.

[-] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago

Right... I want to see Linux distros.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

I hope so as well. This debacle with RCS not working on GrapheneOS has been a real dick-punch. I really don't want to go back to a stock OS.

[-] Chulk@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

I thought the RCS thing was also happening on stock Android? Wasn't it more of a carrier thing?

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

It's been largely fixed for stock with select regions still being affected. RCS is failing on GOS because the correct device ID isn't getting reported and the verification services won't authenticate the OS.

It'll work for about 24 hours, give or take, from a fresh installation, but after that RCS dies and no longer works. Any groups you were in will see you as departed and you will lose any future messages to that group.

It's pretty fucked.

[-] Chulk@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Thanks, I had no idea of the severity. I wonder if they'll be able to fix it.

I convinced my fiance to switch over to GOS because I've had moderate success with it for about a year now. So of course this happens as soon as she made the switch. Now she's talking about getting an iPhone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] other8026@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

It's my understanding that RCS was fixed for most users after this update: https://grapheneos.org/releases#2025092700. You may need to grant permissions to Google Play Services first, then clear Google Messages' storage, grant permissions to Google Messages, then try setting it up again.

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It was not. I have been on the Discord #Testing channel working with others to troubleshoot. Those steps do not work.

It seemed to be fixed on the 20251003 release, a lot of people got it working for a while, including me. It died within 24 hours.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rhythmisaprancer@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

I have accepted no RCS. I miss some of the features, sure, but until I can get more than one person to use something like signal I'll stick with insecure SMS thru a FOSS provider I guess.

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

I have like 40 people on Signal and regularly chat with a dozen of them there. Some people see the benefits, others don't. I am lucky.

[-] rhythmisaprancer@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

That sounds great! So far, after five years, I have won a single person. Even back when Signal worked as a more regular messenger. Happy for you 🙂

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] nicgentile@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

This will face legal hurdles, especially in the EU and China. It reminds me of the time Microsoft played shell games with Chrome and Firefox and then lost eventually. That being said, it will kickstart a new mobile OS arms race, not necessarily to beat Android but for choices.

[-] ISOmorph@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago

This will definitely not be challenged in the EU. It's the whole basis that makes chat control possible on a technical level.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

The markets authority and antitrust offices are different people than the chat control people, they aren't a unified organisation, they will probably argue about it.

[-] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

would love it if some viable linux based alternatives came out of this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Corridor8031@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Android can be forked at any time

[-] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

... except for the binary os blobs, that'll need to be reverse engineered to run it on... well... any real hardware /s

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JBrickelt963@jlai.lu 3 points 1 week ago

Above all, the organisation behind it must be or become sufficiently robust, like GNU/Linux, in order to take up the torch, but that requires a lot of financial backing.

It's not impossible, but in my opinion it won't happen right away and is likely to take time to implement. Once that's done, the only issue left will be installation (for users, that is).

[-] Corridor8031@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

I am not really sure, but i think i have read that google and android has to split up because of cartel laws at some point,

and i hope this might make things better (considering that like a lot of different companys do rely on android after all), but it is a fragile hope

[-] JBrickelt963@jlai.lu 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

That was a possibility, but if I'm not mistaken, it was either Chrome or Android.

And it seems to me that an agreement was reached on Chrome (but no sale planned). So I won't make any predictions. Especially when you see the lockdown on Android, something is brewing, and Google wouldn't allow that if it had to part with it.

Unless they are preparing for the separation by establishing as much interdependence as possible between the two in case of a takeover by another company with a partnership. Because otherwise, the community will know how to unravel and clean up the Android project.

EDIT:

If anything, I've just looked into it and it seems to be stronger than ever after this antitrust ruling. Because what you heard was more what the Ministry was asking the judge to do.

In the end, there will be no dismantling of Android or Chrome, no loss of revenue for "partners" such as Firefox.

There is an end to exclusive contracts, notably to prevent it from imposing Gemini or Chrome, but ONLY for one year. There is also data sharing, particularly related to parts of its search index, but no total obligation and nothing on advertising data, only interactions as a supplement.

It's as if it were letting its competitors take a look at its library without giving them the keys to the safe.

And to top it all off, it seems that Google is preparing a gradual merger of Chrome OS and Android for "greater hegemony". If anything, I've just looked and it seems to be stronger than ever after this antitrust decision. Because what you heard was more what the ministry was asking the judge.

In the end, there will be no dismantling of Android or Chrome, no loss of revenue for "partners" such as Firefox.

There is an end to exclusive contracts, in particular to prevent it from imposing Gemini or Chrome, but ONLY for one year. There will also be data sharing, particularly related to parts of its index, but no total obligation and nothing on advertising data, only interactions.

Here are my sources in French:

  1. https://digitalmag.ci/comment-google-a-evite-la-separation-entre-android-et-chrome-suite-a-une-decision-antitrust/
  2. https://www.frandroid.com/marques/google/2732671_google-fusionne-enfin-android-et-chromeos-pour-en-faire-une-mega-plateforme
[-] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

HarmonyOS already exists in China as a fork of android, I wonder if something similar may spawn from the EU

[-] nicgentile@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I'm surprises at how SailfishOS has a limited presence. This could be that moment. HarmonyOS is sick. I've seen it in action and it is on another league.

[-] NeedyPlatter@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

sigh and here I was looking forward to switching back to Android since I missed being able to install APKS...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
344 points (99.4% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

13917 readers
9 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS