868
submitted 1 year ago by giallo@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

The exchange is about Meta's upcoming ActivityPub-enabled network Threads. Meta is calling for a meeting, his response is priceless!

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

This has me thinking, is there a space set aside for putting profits over people instances out and center so admins can preemptively defederate and/or block them?

I haven't found one yet but I am rather new to this.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago

I think it'll be harder than that, even.

Meta doesn't need to spin up an instance to abuse user data on the fediverse, they just need an app that can read it. A hypothetical meta fediverse app could allow users to select their own instance and still read and collect data on the connected instances. As far as I know, there is no way in the protocol to prevent this.

[-] yashima@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

It‘s not just about the data—which is bad enough but as you said they could just write a crawler to get at it. The question is why would they want to federate and why now? Meta being Meta the most likely reasons are terrible for the fediverse and it reminds me very much of Google and xmpp. I saw a really good writeup on this yesterday: https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] fsniper@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

A more important topic is, what federated data will be kept on Meta, and most importantly HOW that data will be processed/used/sold by Meta.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hexadecimal@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Meta does some interesting open source work, extra hands on fediverse open source might be reasonable.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] bobby_tables@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

I’m surprised by all the negativity. Is it not a good thing Meta is going to use open standard instead of a proprietary one?

[-] mrmanager@lemmy.today 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Meta is not going to "use" this technology, they want to own it. And you can be certain they will try their best to build a walled garden with a Facebook login, so the masses pick their form of fediverse rather than the one not controlled by big tech.

Peoples negativity comes from experience with these corporations. You are probably pretty young if you don't see how bad they are.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[-] z3n0x@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

We shan't bend the knee!

[-] dashlander@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

I have mixed feelings about Facebook being a part of this, but I honestly don't know if I'd want to get closer to Facebook. 💀

[-] the_kgb@lemmy.fmhy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

what are your mixed feelings? truly, what do you think is the positive of meta getting involved?

[-] nzodd@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

Not op but one positive is making their users aware of the existence of the Fediverse and providing an opportunity for non-meta servers to take up some of those same users. The question is what means are available to do that without putting the community at risk.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
868 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37747 readers
216 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS