1085
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] azenyr@lemmy.world 300 points 1 year ago

Valve seems to be the only company on this capitalist world that actually understands that company profits cannot and should not grow exponentially forever without eventually destroying itself. All other companies don't know or want to stop the greed ad are constantly pushing for more profits to see until where they can push the greed and milking without losing "too much" costumers. They even weight the amount of costumers lost vs the extra profits to see if its viable to lose those costumers and still profit, like Netflix. Valve does not work like this. Valve grew to a size, and that size is giving them stable and steady profit. And they are holding that size, slowly growing more here and there but nothing big. The biggest thing they did in like 10 years was the Steam Deck and they will not update it with a Deck 2 anytime soon. Valve plays the very slow, but steady profits game. This is how you win as a company. You try to keep yourself on a balance between good profits and good public perspective.

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 211 points 1 year ago

Being privately held helps a ton. Gabe is his own boss. Once a company's public they're beholden to the investors, and investors want big short term returns so they can dump their stock and move onto the next one.

[-] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 54 points 1 year ago

Maybe that shouldn’t be possible.

[-] bastion@feddit.nl 40 points 1 year ago

Yep. Investing should tie you to a stock for at least a year - as soon as you decide to sell, the one-year timer starts.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] whereBeWaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago

I truly fear the day Gabe passes on. Do we know who would own Valve if Gabe were to pass on today?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Annoyed_Crabby 89 points 1 year ago

Valve able to do that because they are private company, the exponential growth is only made mandatory because of the stakeholder. if the growth is stagnant(even with healthy profit), it's very unattractive to investor, hence growth is needed to keep the cog running.

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago

I wonder, what actual benefits are there in publicly traded companies for society as whole? Benefits that are good for you, me and everyone else equally.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago

Mark my word, once Gabe pass it's gonna be very very different. We have very different things to worried about, like climate change, but on software side and tech we shouldn't rely on monopolies. Valve was kept in that state because all the competition didn't actually put up a fight worth extra investment. The windows store pushed valve to develop SteamOS and Proton, they also back off on some revenue split policy because of EGS's deals. (Let's be honest, not all players care about which launcher they use, as long as they get better deals and can play the game they want.)

And to my experience, Steam's recent years' updates to store/client are not something I like as well.

  • I don't like the gamification of sales event etc.
  • I don't like the new unlimited scroll type, they backed off a bit and become like 3 pages long until you hit the top/popular/sales part.
  • I also don't like some of the UI changes(ie the downloads/library mixed together and not separate item)
  • I hated the auto start live streaming thing, if there is option to turn off that please let me know.

For EGS,

  • their search sucks
  • library page sucks, you can't really organize your free games/purchased games etc.
  • auto updates are pretty on par so that's okay.
  • their friends/etc also sucks.(not that I care much but at least it's far worse than steam one.)
  • I like that they adopted Nintendo's gold coin reward type to encourage consumer to purchase there.
  • games from other big publisher usually do require install their clients as well, which sucks. (it's similar on steam as well.)
[-] DancingIsForbidden@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I want to finish reading your post but now I'm just too sad about the thought of GabeN dieing

I will say one of the things i don't like about egs is nothing similar to steamvr, I still highly enjoy my index and want that industry to do well and refuse to invest in a store with no skin in the vr game.

also, I'm finished with windows forever and steam has native Linux support while egs needs a weird combo of wine, bottles, and lutris to be able to achieve something somewhat similar

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] oce@jlai.lu 16 points 1 year ago

Valve seems to be the only company on this capitalist world that actually understands that company profits cannot and should not grow exponentially forever without eventually destroying itself.

Nah, they are many of them, maybe even the majority of companies are like that (think SMBs). The peculiarity of Valve is that it also managed to become and stay the world leader in its domain, so every nerd knows about it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] delitomatoes@lemm.ee 257 points 1 year ago

If you wonder why public companies with billions in revenue can't make a Steam competitor is because they can't think long term, being a private company allows Valve to just work on what they want and grow If they need to

[-] dukepontus@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 year ago

Exactly this! I dread the day they go public :(

[-] sheogorath@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago

Reportedly Gaben has implemented safeguards to prevent Valve from getting public after his death. So at least we can hope Valve doesn't go public in our lifetimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

See also: Reddit's direction to eventually IPO

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] serratur@lemmy.wtf 18 points 1 year ago

they can't think long term

Well they can, but only in one way: Grow by selling at a loss to outcompete other and then make a profit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 118 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not one that usually calls for the "Hail Corporate" BS where people lick the boots of big companies. In fact, I typically am very anti-corporate in every way, but Valve is one company I honestly have very little problem giving my money to. They very rarely have any anti-consumer things that crop up and every one to memory they've taken feedback and course corrected very rapidly. I'm afraid for the day Gabe Newell dies or retires, though. Whoever takes over Valve is going to have some big shoes to fill.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I'm mad HL2 ended on a cliff hanger and I'm really mad at how they handled TF2. Overall though yeah valve gud.

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

I think that's better than how other companies handle game sequels though Just look at the state of the FIFA franchise

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] crackajack@reddthat.com 17 points 1 year ago

Honestly, when I think of the word "corporate" with its negative baggage, the last entity I will think of is Valve. They've been consistent and good for the past decades thanks to Gabe Newell. If there is any rich tech mogul who should be celebrated more than Elon Musk or Bill Gates, it's Gabe.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ghostface@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago

Google started out the same way. Hopefully this sticks

[-] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 158 points 1 year ago

The advantage atm is that valves privately owned. The moment they go public, be very wary.

[-] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 92 points 1 year ago

I think it will be fine as long as Gaben is there. I am afraid that after he retires or ascends into Godhood somehow John Riccitiello will get his ass into that seat.

[-] spark947@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

It will never go public - they are making money over fist and have no reason to participate in public capital markets. They also aren't really interested in growing. The trade off is that not everyone will be able to get a job there.

[-] leftzero@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 year ago

The question is how long that mindset will survive once Gaben leaves. Or dies.

We need to upload him into a GabenOS of sorts. To preserve the Valve mindset, and also for science.

Some neurotoxin and mass murder would be a small price to pay.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

That's the biggest piece, smaller but worth mentioning is they make money off of our purchases directly unlike Google.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

Valve opened in the late 90s and is privately owned. Never say never where corporations and capitalism are concerned... But hopefully they wont take the evil google approach this late in the game. I think good will from their customers really sets them apart from competitors like Epic.

[-] Cylusthevirus@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

I feel like most of it is private ownership. The minute you enter the CEO/Board of Directors ecosystem with investors to pay and expectations of eternal growth, everything turns to shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mojo@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Valve didn't suddenly get big, they've been dominating the PC space for many, many years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

LOL Valve is not "starting out". They are about as old as Google.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 64 points 1 year ago

I really hope that Gabe has future-proofed valve. It really is a remarkable treasure and one of the most user-friendly platforms of all time. Especially in these days when we are seeing a corporate takeover of the internet, or realizing that we lost a long time ago when we put all of our eggs in the Google basket.

I could see so much potential for fuckery happening, can you imagine if steam was as fond of kicking people off the platform as Reddit is? Or if games were constantly being curated to make sure they check all the boxes like the YouTube algorithm does? Five Nights at Freddy's would have never existed if steam played by those rules, same for every other surprise Indie hit

[-] TheLongPrice@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago

It's private at least, a good first step

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Colorcodedresistor@lemm.ee 52 points 1 year ago

Gabes replacement will be the tell all. and as much as i want steam to exist over multiple generations..i dont think it can survive turnover, greed, opportunistic bastards.

[-] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

I think this is the difference between private/public companies. They don't have to deal with the "growth at all costs" mindset that plague public companies.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

I really hope that he is planned out his successor meticulously,

Imagine if it was as Ban Happy as Reddit, Corporate as Youtube, or... owned by Elon Musk

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JowlesMcGee@kbin.social 47 points 1 year ago

It's kind of odd, because it feels like they do sell promotion at the very least. For instance, Immortals of Aveum (the new EA game) is constantly shown on my store homepage, despite it being more or less a commercial flop. I know that page is customized, but I would have figured that game would be replaced by others now if the selection was fully organic. I had just assumed EA paid for some agreement that would promote the game on the main page for a set amount of time.

I'm sure it's just coincidence, but their statement just surprised me since the store feels like it promotes specific games already.

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Never seen that game in my homepage... You may have played similar games

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago

It could be that part of their algorithm involves significantly weighting past sales by a publisher/development studio, especially early in the life cycle.

[-] spark947@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

They definitely give curated preference to companies that have had successful games on steam. I wouldn't be surprised if they have something worked out with EA.

Honestly, I wouldn't try to gotcha Valve on anything. They are a games distributor, and they will do and say anything to promote games that are selling well, and the developers and publishers behind them. They don't give a crap about games or devs that aren't selling. Nor would/should they.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Scrof@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] s_s@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Steam is a store.

Why would they try and sell you someone else's goods?

LMAO.

[-] IMALlama@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Amazon is also a store, but they have sponsored listings that get preferential placement. Not technically ads, but very similar idea...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
1085 points (98.6% liked)

Games

16845 readers
896 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS