141
submitted 1 month ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/android@lemdro.id

Mit der Version 10.x der Google-Kamera-App (Pixel Camera) hat Google offenbar eine harte Abhängigkeit von den Play Services eingeführt.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 90 points 1 month ago

Oh my fucking god please just fucking stop

[-] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 month ago

I know that German is bad, but it’s not that intolerable (/s)

[-] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 month ago

Android is not your friend. If your camera needs to spy on you, then it's not your camera.

I use iPhone myself — though I was an Android user longer, and I enjoy both mobile platforms for their various strengths — but we really do need a third option. So Android is kind of like Windows now, it leans heavy into AI (especially on the Pixel side), and it's on everything (except the iPhone), and iPhone has always just been a pocket Mac, but with the walled app garden. Apple says you can trust them with your personal data, but you don't know that and Apple is big enough that they can basically do whatever they want — and they've been cosying up to fascists in the US. So that's unsettling. Mobiles need a Linux option. A totally open source option that serves the user exclusively, or can be made to do so. GrapheneOS is a fine choice, but it's limited to Pixels. If you have anything else, you're out of luck, and if you have a Pixel, you or someone else has paid Google iPhone money for a device that's at least a few generations behind performance-wise. So not ideal.

Of course, most Android users and certainly most Android fans won't care about this — I'm coming from the privacy perspective. And Google's always been pretty clear that they are not there for your privacy.

[-] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 month ago

Android is actually your friend, Google is not. You can take Google out of Android but not Android out of Google.

There's a decade of custom ROMs to prove it, unlike an iPhone where someone else dictates every aspect for you. There's way ahead in performance, but that's all gone to waste for power users. Even their browser is like the the ones you used to have on flip phones.

I was hoping the recent monopoly suit to be anything other than a wrist slap for google, but that's too much to expect from US.

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

You can take Google out of Android but not Android out of Google.

They sure are trying https://fuchsia.dev/

[-] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

I've been through the best years of custom firmware. Back in the Jellybean/Kitkat days. My favourite was a fork of AOKP called LiquidSmooth.

Custom firmware comes at your own risk though. If something goes wrong, maybe you can find some help... but maybe you can't.

Then you have guys who say "I'll make custom firmware for your phone if the community buys me one." The community buys them one from donations, and dude flips it on eBay the next day. I've seen that happen too.

There needs to be a commercial interest in private and available custom firmware for Android. Because otherwise it's just a hobby.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

I’ve been through the best years of custom firmware. Back in the Jellybean/Kitkat days.

...that was over a decade ago.

[-] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 28 points 1 month ago

And iPhone is any better? Get a grip. The iPhone is just more closed and obscured.

[-] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 month ago

For customisation? No. For privacy? Yes.

One's made by a computer company and the other is made by an advertising company. These are not the same things at all.

[-] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I use to think so. There have been things more recently that makes me unsure if the distinction is as large as we would like to think. Apple is clearly less transprent too so it makes it realy hard to judge.

[-] zelnix@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Less transparent my ass. The first time you use any apple app it gives you a summary of the privacy implications, what data is collected, etc. that’s the exact opposite of your statement.

Google instead links you to their monolithic TOS / privacy policy which covers all their products and is super opaque.

[-] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I used to think that until this https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2025/01/03/apple-siri-class-action-lawsuit/77426858007/ . Claims are one thing. Actions are another. The sad fact is Apple is so locked so there is very little way to verify anything. There is also very little choice to opt out. At least Android is FOSS and you do not have to use Google apps or services.

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 19 points 1 month ago

Lineage temporarily, until Linux works good enough

[-] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 month ago

Android ain't my friend, Cyanogenmod was and LineageOS is.

[-] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

CM was okay. It's the one custom firmware I got my wife to install... on something called a Samsung Acclaim back in 2010. Absolute dogshit phone, made tolerable by CM. I actually kinda miss that phone sometimes. Later, it was a little square... nice for an AOSP-like, but then we had AOKP and Paranoid Android doing way cooler shit. I did respect CM for keeping it simple though.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Lineage OS is CM's direct successor, after Kondik fucked up CM.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Cyanogenmod was and LineageOS is.

....both of which are Android. That's akin to saying "It's not Linux, it's Debian".

[-] passenger@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 month ago

Use Open Camera, or the GrapheneOS Camera app or another FOSS alternative.

[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes but the the pixel camera app has much better quality that the GOS camera or open camera. They cannot compete.

It's terribly frustrating I am so tired of google messing up Android (and their pixels). I use the google camera app on GOS and it needs the play store, Play services and the google photo...

[-] passenger@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

Specify how it has much better quality, then post that spec in some github of your favourite camera app.

Your data is the price for the google app, it isn't free. They can do what they want with it. And you buy it.

My advice for you is to shake off the google camera addiction and notice how good the alternatives are. Good enough for sure, and getting better. I have not missed google camera at all.

Maybe try this freedcam as well.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Your data is the price for the google app, it isn’t free.

No, I paid $1200 for the phone. That was the price for google's camera app. Google is double-dipping now.

[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Graining is the worst offender on GOS Camera app. The lower the light the more graining.

This is on GOS camera app 9107

This is the official gcam 9108

Pictures are taken on a Pixel 9

Hopefully the image compression doesn't mess everything up

[-] passenger@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Very interesting, would be cool to see some comparison to the others as well.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

I mean that's just physics. Less light entering the sensor = more grain as it boosts the brightness to compensate. They both take the same picture, but extra processing hides the flaws.

Got to be honest, I prefer grain over a bunch of AI swirls.

[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean the extra processing is worthy here is another example:

GOS: 9116

Gcam: 9117

I understand where you are coming from. Myself in my line of work google is actually my enemy however credits due where credit is due. I think it's at minimum somewhat disingenuous to consider the GOS camera as an equal of gcam. In low light the camera is not usable if I'm going out taking picture at cafés and what not with my GF in the evening or night it's just not possible.

[-] passenger@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago
[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 2 points 1 month ago

I believe it's simply the lack of processing. The camera app is fine on it's own but in quite frankly 80% of situations it is really outmatched by gcam

[-] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 month ago

FreeDCam is also very good, better than OpenCamera in some aspects

[-] bufalo1973@piefed.social 21 points 1 month ago

Another option: use another app that doesn't require it.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

The enshittification encroaches.

[-] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 month ago

Ah crap. I hope some simple dummy app like Gcam Services Provider can work around this..

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
141 points (98.6% liked)

Android

20839 readers
88 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS