If I remember correctly, I think another major hurdle is the feedback loop part (prosthetic inputs to neural connections). We have some relative understanding of having machines to act in how we intend, but without that loop, still leads to a lot of errors. I don't mean full simulation of the sensorium to mimic having your arm back, but the minimal amount necessary for fluid movement without conscious visual monitoring.
We’re not really close to the point where any prosthetic is an upgrade on any human limb. Prosthetics you can control with your mind do exist, but are severely limited compared to human limbs. I’ve yet to see any prosthetic that’s stronger than a human limb.
There are two big limitations to consider:
I’m no expert, but I do have an interest in prosthetics and have been following the news and have seen lots of conversations that have no solutions for those two problems.
the main benefits from prosthetics are usually due to properties that the prosthetic have that a normal limb wouldn't have (or vice versa) - like specialized prosthetic limbs for rock climbing
still, I would expect most people would be able to use a tool in lieu of a prosthetic ... still, the absence of a limb might be advantageous in some situations (even if obviously a downside in others).
I've seen some pretty gnarly prosthetics that attach to nerves and are manipulated just like your real limbs (not as dexterous tho) and they could make you stronger than before but they tend to limit the actuation limits so you don't accidentally squeeze too hard. You are also still limited by your meat that it attaches to. Have you ever seen the OG Ghost in the Shell? Remember the end when the Major is breaking into that tank? You wouldn't want to rip your arms off again trying to lift something your flesh and bone shoulders, back and legs couldn't handle.
Yeah, regardless of how 'strong' a prosthetic may be, biomechanics is still very much a limiting factor.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.