12
submitted 1 month ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 month ago

I'll add that to my $5,000 DOGE dividend. Why do news outlets report what he says when he's obviously lying?

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I’ll bet money that he’s going to actually try to do this.

Remember when Congress voted to send Americans assistance checks during the pandemic — and Trump plastered his name all over those checks for shameless political points?

This guy 100% wants to send out “Trump” checks again.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

"When Congress voted" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago

i believe it when i see it. he's announced the same thing back in may and nothing happened.

[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Not happening

[-] Joeffect@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What's high income 30k a year or more? Such a joke...

The $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms, in lots of ways, George," Bessent told anchor George Stephanopoulos. "You know, it could be just the tax decreases that we are seeing on the president's agenda -- you know, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans."

Oh so no money for you

[-] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

So what this means is there will be no $2000 check. It will just be "hidden" relief that is almost impossible to actually see and verify. Cool cool cool

[-] Joeffect@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That's what I get out of it... something they can say they did... but its actually nothing...

[-] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Great, so the four people who can itemize tips will benefit.

[-] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

These are all measures which reinforce some negative aspects of US economy, apart from social security taxes.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They want to let us deduct our auto loans? I haven't heard that one yet. My car payment is crazy high though lol

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

$2000 a person won't even offset the additional cost from the ACA subsidy reduction. So, a one-time check that would only cover several months of the recurring cost that he's given us.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago

When you’re that rich, $2000 and $0 are basically the same. It’s a pittance for what they see as an underclass of poors.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago

I think a lot of people don't get this.

Imagine there's something that you want--maybe a lot, maybe only a little. What that something is doesn't matter.

What amount of money would you consider to be a negligible amount for you to spend to get that thing you want? Maybe it's a few dollars or maybe it's as little as 10 cents. For me, now that I am reasonably comfortable, anything that only costs about a dollar, I consider to basically be free.

This is how the wealthy view anything that is "only" in the thousands of dollars.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It also won't make up for the small businesses that went under because their margins disappeared.

[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

Trump steals people's money, then gives some back to them, and that's supposed to pacify them?
How about not stealing people's money to begin with?

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

and that's supposed to pacify them?

Every single MAGAt will instantly forget any complaints the second they have a check in hand.

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It doesn't actually sound like anyone will get a check "lots of ways" probably means it's never going to happen, but all the MAGAs will point to him just saying this and gushing about how generous he is

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago

That's weird, because the COVID checks were insanely popular and just giving everyone a $2000 check with his name on it would be great politics. I guess it's good they're doing it differently.

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Bread and circuses

[-] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Just ballparking that there are 250 million non-high-earners, at $2k a pop that's $500 billion. Two thousand dollars won't change anyone's life, but $500bn is a big chunk of the federal budget.

[-] shiroininja@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago
[-] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Sorry, I didn't mean to trivialize that amount of money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The ultra wealthy already got their 'tariff dividend', in the form of not tax breaks and a discrete heads-up of when to play the market to real maybe amounts of extra wealth.

As for the rest, this offer is just more bullshit. If it does surface (which is very unlikely) there will be some strings attached. And it will in no way fully compensate most people for the turmoil caused by these tariffs.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 month ago

"The $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms, in lots of ways, George," Bessent told anchor George Stephanopoulos. "You know, it could be just the tax decreases that we are seeing on the president's agenda -- you know, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans."

🚨scam alert🚨

[-] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Is this dividend in the room with us right now?

[-] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

He has concepts of a dividend.

[-] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

So this is where snap money has gone too

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

How about you use that money to pay SNAP instead?

[-] ninj4geek@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 month ago

Because he can say this and it won't happen.

[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

I’ll take it the way I took his stupid ass signed pandemic check. It’s not gonna make me hate the fucker any less, and I’m not stupid enough to think the amount of money the average person has lost on these fucking tariffs is less than $2000. So yeah, pay me to keep the same opinion of you and your policies, shithead.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

I donated mine 50/50 to Planned Parenthood and SPLC. I don't want his blood money.

[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

I’m glad that’s a financial option for you

[-] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

He says a lot of things. Meanwhile he's gone out of his way repeatedly to try to starve millions of people.

[-] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

So a $2k decrease in taxes using some kind of unspecified math, while cost of living increases by triple that number.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That's gonna barely buy most families a month

[-] splount@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

In two weeks. Very special. Don't want to say much now but it's gonna be really special.

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The Trump 2 week chicken taco timeline.

He started with "solving crime in Chicago in 1 day"

Then they had a Medicare plan just a week away, but he learned that that was too close for the right wing spin machine.

[-] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Lol, bet he's only saying this so when the Supreme Court comes down on his illegal tariffs he can say he was going to give us that money.

[-] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

He won't remember any of this by tomorrow, much less when or if SCrOTUS does anything.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Technically, If the Supreme Court rules that his tariffs were illegal to begin with, he will be expected to reimburse everyone affected. That may be all this is. He's just trying to spin it as spontaneous generosity, rather than a court ordered obligation.

[-] foodandart@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Oh look.. Little ManBaby is trying to buy friends.

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It'll probably work, too, if he does it a month before midterms.

[-] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Lolz, for them it’s $5,000.

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Also hand out cash to people for their medical bills bypassing insurance companies:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15272123/donald-trump-healthcare-plan-change.html

Obvs that's a lot worse than it sounds.

[-] khepri@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

How about "There is Zero Evidence of $2000 Trump Checks Beyond Mere Words" as the headline ABC? Christ. Or "Trump Floats Idea of $2000 Checks, Or Maybe It's a Tax Rebate, Or Maybe Nothing, Or Maybe He Just Says Shit and We Eat It Up Every Time. Who Cares? Just Stay Scared and Don't Change That Dial!"

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

This orange fuck with his grossly transparent attempts to bribe the poors

The sad part is it'll probably work.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

News

33695 readers
1014 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS