115
submitted 3 days ago by GammaGames@beehaw.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 3 days ago

This game is dead chief. Or you're going to wish it's going to be dead if it ever releases

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 26 points 3 days ago

Yeaaah, it might sell okay but there’s no way it gets a positive rating on steam after all the controversy. The people in charge are really bad at their job

[-] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 43 points 2 days ago

The best thing that could happen is to have the Subnautica founders either settle with them to take back the IP (and ideally at least the payout they are owed), or utterly wipe the floor with them in court, and then use the damages awarded to create the true successor to Subnautica that it was always going to be without the interference, meddling and sabotage from Krafton.

[-] Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org 30 points 3 days ago

Damn. That's a huge shame. The first game was excellent. I was really hoping we would get something similar

[-] Faydaikin@beehaw.org 6 points 2 days ago

The really sad part is that the studio, as is, only has Below Zero and Moonbreaker to show for. Not the best portfolio to be honest.

And with everything else going on now on top of it, I'm starting to think Subnautica will remain a one-hit-wonder.

[-] Aaron@lemmy.nz 6 points 2 days ago

Have you tried Below Zero? I know some didn't like it as there was a lot more on-land play, but I thought it was pretty good.

[-] Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org 4 points 2 days ago

I have played it! I thought the water gameplay was pretty good, but the on land was not my favorite.

I really liked the cyclops submarine as a mobile base. It just felt like it made the underwater sections feel claustrophobic and dangerous at every turn once you encountered the larger leviathans. I missed it a lot in below zero

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 9 points 2 days ago

Fucking hell the internet without ad blocking is suffocating

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wait wait wait, these are the same clowns behind the KSP 2 fiasco? Wowwwww...

Edit: I misread

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 6 points 2 days ago

Different company, that was Private Division. While searching to see if there were any connections I did find a funny quote they tried to use as an excuse to fire the leads though:

Krafton was not willing to take the risk of the resulting damage to the Subnautica franchise and the Company’s long-term reputation–a risk that, if materialized, would be irreversible, as shown with Kerbal Space Program 2

Considering how that turned out, lmao

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

I misread that, oops

[-] danielhanrahantng@beehaw.org 4 points 2 days ago

That was stupid

[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Hah ! incriminating evidence ? I don't know how decisive is an email conversation printout.

edit I'm asking. Can we still ask things ?

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 9 points 2 days ago

Emails are evidence, that’s why they’re entered into the record

[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 2 days ago
[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 4 points 2 days ago

It is! The modern court system probably wouldn’t be able to function without allowing emails

[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 4 points 2 days ago

cheers. I was in doubt because french justice famously disregarded a very incriminating recorded phone convo between Sarkozy and one of his accomplices. So I thought, maybe this is similar

[-] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

I am just here to comment on your edit.

Maybe something is lost in translation, but it doesn't read as if you are asking a question. But that you're using the question as device to make your point.

[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

ah ! thank you for chiming in. What point does it sound like I am making?

To clarify, I was trying to express the following : I hope these emails constitute incriminating evidence, but I cannot tell due to my complete lack of knowledge wrt US law.

[-] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

The point it sounds like you are trying to make is "Email is not evidence."

By writing "I don’t know how decisive is an email conversation printout." after your question, it reads as if you ask the questions just so you can give your own answer.
By placing "Hah !" before the question also implies that the answer to the question is so obviously negative that it doesn't need to be answered.

If you do both of those things, almost no one will see what you wrote as a question, at least in English. I don't know Parisian French, so it might not read that way in other languages, and you might not have meant it that way.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
115 points (98.3% liked)

Gaming

33061 readers
35 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS