0
submitted 1 week ago by Cricket@lemmy.zip to c/rant@lemmy.sdf.org

Note to the haters: if you threaten me like you apparently threatened the poster of the other thread complaining about cm0002's multiple accounts which caused them to delete their post and their account and leave Lemmy, I will report you and repost screenshots of your threats publicly. If you act too egregiously, I will report you to law enforcement and/or my lawyer. I have legal insurance and am willing to use it. Be civil and let us have a civilized discussion.

I had noticed that cm0002 was a high-volume poster on Lemmy a while ago. After they cross-posted a few of my posts from lemmy.ml communities to other communities on other instances, I asked them about their motivation for doing this. They are open and public about their desire to draw traffic away from lemmy.ml and support away from Lemmy devs because they think that "tankies" are going to destroy the Threadiverse. I was having a decent, amicable discussion with them on direct messages, but as soon as I expressed that I was sympathetic to some of the political views of the so-called "tankies", I never got a reply.

Then the whole post about them creating accounts on pretty much every Threadiverse instance came up just yesterday (https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/45730651). While some people defended this type of activity as not being ban-evasion because they are not trying to hide being the same user, I feel that if nothing else, this makes it more difficult for moderators to review a user's posting history to spot a pattern of bad behavior. If someone reports one of the (dozens? hundreds?) of cm0002 accounts, a mod may see only a few posts from the reported account and not get a full picture of this user.

Finally, I started looking into their one-person crusade against Lemmy devs, lemmy.ml, and "tankies". I started looking at their claims more closely and didn't like what I saw. To me it seems like they are making many distorted or debatable claims and spamming the Threadiverse with these. I read their "megathread" (https://sh.itjust.works/post/37226752) of supposed evidence that the Lemmy devs, lemmy.ml, and "tankies" are bad, and think the whole thing is lame, flawed, and dangerous:

  • First, notice that the majority of posts that they link contain only what they would like you to see, and not a link to the original thread where one would be able evaluate the context for what was said.

  • Second, notice that even where screenshots are provided, what the list item claims was said is most often not what was actually said. In other words, distortions. Specifically, most of the items that are claimed to be direct quotes (based on the quote marks around them) don't at all appear to be actual quotes. I'm not a lawyer, but I would think that in many jurisdictions this would be grounds for a libel lawsuit.

  • Third, most of the items that are not outright distortions are either exaggerations or debatable.

I personally feel that this crusade is more damaging to the Threadiverse than anything that they have complained about. I've been tired for a while of all the whining that I see here about "tankies" (Tankie Derangement Syndrome?), but have been holding my tongue. All this stuff from cm0002 is finally driving me to respond. Look, it's fine to have the beliefs of a liberal, conservative, MAGA, loyal supporter of the United States' imperial project, or a "tankie". Live and let live. Learn to accept that people who think differently from you may have legitimate and valid reasons for thinking that way, as much as you may disagree (except fascists). I wish people would learn to agree to disagree after a discussion reaches a certain point where it becomes clear that it's no longer productive. What's not fine is to relentlessly target and persecute other people and other instances (again, except fascists). This is why I call this a crusade, because it's nearly religious in nature. These people and instances haven't committed any crime. Threadiverse visitors don't deserve to be bombarded with all the whining and complaining that we often see. For all the complaining that I see about "Russian/Chinese bots", I sometimes wonder if many of the complainers aren't either intelligence or corporate agents trying to destabilize the Threadiverse.

My proposal: If nothing else comes out of this, I think that it would be beneficial to the Threadiverse if all instances added rules against disparaging, targeting, and persecuting other instances and users of other instances in general, especially if using false claims that border on libel, if they don't already have such a rule. If we want to see the Threadiverse be sustainable as a Reddit alternative in the long term, I think that this would be a useful step contributing to that.

Another thing: I think that most instances defederating the so-called "tankie triad" (hexbear.net, lemmygrad.ml and lemmy.ml) is stupid to start with and damaging to the health of Lemmy and the Threadiverse (Lemmy/Mbin/Piefed), considering that at least Lemmy (and I imagine the others too) now allows users to block entire instances and allows admins to make this user-level block the default for new users. My instance, lemmy.zip, takes this default user-level block approach (for hexbear and lemmygrad) and I think that it's a reasonable way to handle any concerns about the "triad".

Anyway, I decided to look through cm0002's "megathread" (https://sh.itjust.works/post/37226752) that they keep spamming and make comments showing how just about every item on the list is flawed, in my opinion. I only looked through the supposed "noteworthy selection" since those have their comments about the item on the main list. I suspect that most people wouldn't look past that list and take it at face value. Note that most of them seem to indicate either problems with reading comprehension, malicious distortions, or lame complaints about random internet comments. There is no point in debating the items below with me. It's fine to debate the items above with me. Like I said above, learn to accept that people may think differently than you do and learn to agree to disagree.

Dessalines - Head .ml admin - Head Lemmy Dev

  1. “Slava Ukraini” is considered a “Fascist slogan” - https://lemmy.world/post/36065538 - Debatable. It has a history of use by fascists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slava_Ukraini

  2. “NK is actually good, and anything counter to that is Western LIES” - https://lemmy.world/post/31595035 - Distortion. Note the quotes, making this appear to be a direct quote, whereas Dessalines doesn't appear to have written the quoted text on this linked thread.

  3. “The BBC is not a credible news source” - https://lemmy.world/post/35824465 - Debatable. First, it's a partial quote with no link to the original thread to get the context of the comment. Second, not credible is perhaps exaggerating a bit, but BBC news earns plenty of valid criticisms about bias. Here's a collection of many of the criticisms: https://iea.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/BBC%20Bias%20Chp%203.pdf

  4. Showing support for Ukraine on .ml is worthy of a site ban - https://lemmy.world/post/32775563 - Distortion, debatable, and exaggeration. First, the comment used the slogan from item 1. Second, also note that it was a 30 day ban, which the lemmy.ml code of conduct appears to call a "kick" as opposed to a permanent ban.

  5. Open declaration of support for Russia - https://lemmy.world/post/27352415 - Distortion and debatable. Even though from what I've seen in the past I believe that Dessalines possibly supports Russia, that is not what the posted chart shows. The chart is not unconditionally supporting Russia. It's making the claim that if a person supports Russia (in the Russia-Ukraine conflict) AND Palestine (in the Israel-Palestine conflict), it means they "fully understands the core of international geopolitics, while if they support Russia AND Israel, they believe in "Social Darwinism" (i.e., the discredited idea that stronger countries are always right). In other words, the chart is absolutely not unconditionally supporting Russia.

  6. "Don’t worry guys, the Uyghur Genocide was REALLY just birth control! - https://lemmy.world/post/30580167 - Distortion. Again a completely fake quote and again no link to original thread for context.

  7. Censoring criticism of China while allowing fellow “in-crowd” user “concentration camps were just reeducation camps and weren’t that bad” misinfo to remain - https://lemmy.world/post/26985447 - Distortion and Debatable. The first comment that was removed seemed to be criticizing the Soviet Union for having had "concentration camps" and the second post from the user removed for criticizing China for also having "concentration camps". Did the USSR have concentration camps? The first result that uses that term when I searched was literally the CIA website, and when you read the historical document there, it is clear that they are calling the gulags (prisons) "concentration camps". Regarding China having those (presumably referring to the Uyghurs in Xinjiang), Wikipedia itself calls them internment camps, similar to the Japanese internment camps in the US during World War II. Meanwhile, cm0002 complains about a comment using the term "shitlib", which is a criticism of someone's political philosophy, not being removed. The two are not equivalent.

  8. Censoring when users call out propaganda - https://lemmy.world/post/32776038 | https://lemmy.world/post/33416433 | https://lemmy.world/post/34051329 | https://lemmy.world/post/35919522 - Debatable. At least some of the removed comments seem to be purely anti-Russia ("Fuck russia!"). The others seem debatable on the basis that other instances' admins do the same or worse.

  9. Discussing winnie the pooh and/or the negatives of china is a 30 day ban - https://lemmy.world/post/35374967 - Debatable. This is pretty weaksauce to use as a reason to defederate one of the top Lemmy instances.

Davel - .ml admin

  1. Spreading anti-ukraine Russian propaganda - https://lemmy.world/post/34655572 - Misinformation. The article they're complaining about literally links to documents on the CIA's own website discussing their 1957 plans. Is it "Russian propaganda" to discuss historical facts?

  2. General negative sentiment to other instances who haven’t “seen the way” yet - https://lemmy.world/post/27426510 - I don't even understand this one, plus again no link to original thread for context.

  3. “See! nobody died IN Tiananmen Square, just AROUND it, so it doesn’t count!!” - https://lemmy.world/post/30673342 - Distortion. No link to original thread for context, no evidence that they wrote what is "quoted".

  4. Response to a valid report of “NK is actually good” as propaganda/misinfo https://lemmy.world/post/32627834 - Distortion and debatable. Once again, not actual quote and no link to thread for context. The meme itself is obviously shitposting, FFS.

  5. Removal of a credible article that was on the Uyghur genocide - https://lemmy.world/post/33205310 - Debatable. The mod removed a story that they saw as bigoted, possibly because of xenophobia. No link to original article or the cross-posted thread.

  6. It’s totally fine when Russia kills woman and children, war is war after all - https://lemmy.world/post/33224299 - Distortion. First, no link to thread for context. Second, they are distorting what was said. The actual quote: "Still not a genocide. There is no war where women, children, and other civilians don't end up getting killed."

Nutomic - 2nd in command Lemmy Dev

  1. Their continued transphobia - https://lemmy.world/post/29222558 - Debatable. No link to thread for context, and they were contrite in the screenshots.

General Tankie user behaviour [note: this is about random users of lemmy.ml]

  1. “Propaganda is good actually” - https://lemmy.world/post/36162233 - Distortion and debatable. No link to thread for context. Partial quote taking it out of context. The actual full quote in the screenshot: "Anyone pushing their views is propaganda. Propaganda isn't always a bad thing, propaganda can be good, like antifascist or pro-communist propaganda, or it can be bad, like fascist propaganda."

  2. “The China censorship tool isnt actually censorship! And if it is, it’s actually a good thing a state has that much power!” https://lemmy.world/post/30010789 - Distortion. Again no link to thread for context, plus no indication that what they claim to be a direct "quote" was actually written by the person. Besides, this is a random user linking to a YouTube video.

  3. Rooting for Russia in the Russia-Ukraine war https://lemmy.world/post/29274763 - Distorion. No link to original thread for context, and screenshot does not say what this item claims.

  4. Spreading Russia talking points like the Ukraine invasion just being a “negotiating tactic” https://lemmy.world/post/27012640 - Distortion. No link to original thread for context. The article in the screenshot claims "Not enough to conquer Ukraine, the invading force was sufficient to persuade Ukraine to the negotiating table." That is not saying that they invaded only to bring Ukraine to the negotiating table, but that Ukraine came to the negotiating table as a result of the invasion. Different meanings.

  5. Biden is worse than Trump - https://lemmy.world/post/33631617 - Distortion. No link to original thread for context. What was actually written by a random user on the screenshot: "I'd argue Biden is worse. Trump is honest about being a terrible person. Biden pretends to be good."

  6. Uyghur Genocide denialism - https://lemmy.world/post/33873969 - Distortion. No link to original thread for context. Not an accurate summation of what was said.

I reserve the right to edit this post to clarify points and/or add additional thoughts.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] socsa@piefed.social 21 points 1 week ago

Nah bro, the biggest threat to the fediverse is that the main dev is cringe as fuck and spends more time being an authoritarian jackass than developing Lemmy. Fortunately there are better options so it's fine to let him tilt at his windmills, but his influence is absolutely holding Lemmy back.

Sue me in fucking Canada for all I care.

[-] Cricket@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

That note about lawyers was only to try to help people who would resort to threats to back off. You're fine. It's fine to disagree with me in a civil manner.

Hey, I don't think it's ideal that the developers of a program are so political if they want wide adoption, but I think that all this complaining about them only brings them more attention. What's worse for Lemmy adoption? That the developers are political and "an authoritarian jackass" or that people run around screaming from the mountain tops calling attention to this?

[-] socsa@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

These are the consequences of the way they handle themselves. I have been caught up in their tantrums on many occasions myself and I have zero patience left for it. When you act the way they do, when you ban users for made up rules, selectively enforce those rules, while going around openly baiting people, you better believe they are going to hold a grudge. The fact that they go around casually making enemies like this is why people like CM exist. It's predictable and preventable, but that would require at least a child's level of self awareness.

Seriously go check Dessalines post history. The dude literally does not post on any comm that isn't hosted on .ml because he is so fucking fragile he cannot participate in a community where he can't swing his pathetic ban hammer. And you think that kind of leadership isn't a bigger problem than calling him out on it? It's not my job or your job to tolerate his impotent bullshit, and if he doesn't like that maybe he should grow the fuck up. This is not imagined and it is not an overreaction. It is a justified response to the way he treats others, and honestly this is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of potential liability on the fediverse as far as I'm concerned

[-] Cricket@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Fair enough, thanks for elaborating your perspective.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

the dude you're responding to got banned on .ml for complaining about Palestinians being violent, they have an extreme chip on their shoulder about anyone on their left

[-] Cricket@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

Good to know, thanks!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cricket@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

I do have one question that I forgot to ask of you. If the Lemmy devs are so terrible, why wouldn't cm0002 make his "megathread" with posts that would actually make them look bad, as opposed to mostly either distortions or nothingburgers like they did? Why not expose people with truthful information rather than made up stuff? Doing this severely weakens their case.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

I don't really agree with your premise that the points made aren't valid, and I'm not going to debate the points individually. CM's method of prosecuting his gripes are different than mine, but overall I think the assessment that they aggressively push a very specific "tankie" narrative is generally true, and that this often adds up to greater than the sum of their individual behaviors. Like I suggest in my other comment, one of the most obnoxious things they do is just strictly enforce a specific editorial order by selectively enforcing rules. It's a very obvious pattern - if Davel or Nutomic or company actually gets into a debate they are careful to stick to the script and let other users (or alts) tag in to bait and troll until they have an excuse to hand out a ban. The issue is not that they are saying "hey I don't think China is probably engaged in genocide." It's that if anyone pushes back will get flamed and sealioned until they slip up and get banned for extremely vague rule violations, while the tankie trolls do not face any such consequences. In this way they enforce an extremely strict, singular, and arguably problematic version of "left unity" which effectively excludes most other leftists who do not fully buy into the Leninist imperial hypothesis.

To summarize, whether or not CM's examples illustrate a narrative danger to the fediverse is tangent to my argument. My argument is that the way the ML devs behave to enforce their narrative is the problem, as it is just doing all the shit they claim to hate about reddit, but with a red coat of paint.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago

also the comm they're posting this in has some pretty egregious comments being made and not being moderated because it's a snark comm for 'social Democrat' power users to punch left

specifically calling users of other instances 'degenerate roaches', mwog is loaded with posters eager to be free of 'degenerates', calling myself and others degenerate roaches.

dancing-roach

directly quoting db0: Guy uses “degenerates” straight and is complaining about commies, progressives and furries. 90% they’re a cryptofash.

so far there's been zero action taken, beyond banning one dude for a slap on the wrist period of 7 days, and not removing any of the posts in question.

[-] Cricket@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the summary and the receipts! I knew that mwog was full of shit, which is why I blocked that comm long ago. I only waded in there to address cm0002's list point by point.

[-] LordMayor@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago

This post, and you, are ridiculous.

[-] Cricket@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 week ago

This is the longest post I've never read.

[-] Cricket@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thanks for reading it. :)

Edit: haha, I just noticed that you said "never" not "ever". In that case, no problem. I'm not forcing anyone to read my rant post. :)

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 1 week ago

as soon as I expressed that I was sympathetic to some of the political views of the so-called "tankies", I never got a reply.

Makes sense to me. It's not worth continuing to argue with someone who admits to being in bad faith.

[-] Cricket@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago
[-] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Imagine you're talking with someone about science, and after a while they say they believe in a flat earth.

At that point, it's understandable to end the conversation. Because flat earth discussions have all been had, and anyone who believes in a flat earth in 2025 doesn't believe in science. You've identified a fundamental principal on which you disagree, and there can be no productive discussion.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

One of the worst thing the right has done is be so fucking stupid that they make liberals assume anyone who disagrees with them for any reason must also just be stupid.

[-] Cricket@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

I get the argument you're trying to make and I appreciate you doing so, but it sounds like you're trying to say that being anti-Western capitalist hegemony is equivalent to believing in a flat earth. Is that what you really believe, and if so, why? All evidence completely debunks flat-earth theory, so I understand why someone would disengage from debating with someone who believed that. On the other hand, most evidence makes Western capitalist hegemony look very bad, so why is it invalid to be against that?

load more comments (41 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

[this is what mwog power users actually believe]

The reality:

[-] rustyfish@piefed.world 10 points 1 week ago

We reached the point of legal sabre rattling at the start of a thread.

Amazing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WallsToTheBalls@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 week ago

One of the biggest pushing forces that have made people move away from Lemmy is tankies, demonstrably. .ml and Lemmygrad are shockingly toxic, regardless of if you agree with their politics(and you’d better, yor you’re insta banned)

It’s so such a meme, there are multiple communities documenting people catching full site bans for saying things like “Russia is kind of uncool, actually”

It doesn’t really go much deeper than that. The admins are authoritarian assholes that have fallen deep into the online leftist rabbit hole, and well adjusted users don’t want to be around them.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] marcos@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Dude, I do recommend you look into yourself asking why so many people are disgusted by your believes and want to isolate you. It's absolutely not something only 1 or 2 people do, and it's not some frivolous preconception from people that never got you the benefit of the doubt.

You've got a rare opportunity where the bubble your ideas create got temporarily busted. It will form around you again if you don't take it to reevaluate those ideas.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Dude, I do recommend you look into yourself asking why so many people are disgusted by your believes and want to isolate you. It’s absolutely not something only 1 or 2 people do

In my case, I'd say the main reason is that I don't believe in God, and I'm queer. I don't mean on Lemmy, I mean in the conservative area where I grew up. Lots of people were "disgusted by my beliefs," and it certainly wasn't "something only 1 or 2 people do."

However, since I rely on reason and evidence (rather than fucking societal pressure like liberals always seem to want me to follow), I was able to overcome all that.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago

And yet a few days ago people chased off someone ranting in a rant comm about cm. Seems more like those advocates for cm can't handle the criticism or anything pointing out logical flaws in the megathread they update

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

Ok. So I had a similar initial experience to you initially but I am slightly left and libertarian of center (real center not the us overton window thing). I had the convo which happened when someone said to hit him up as I just assumed he was a bot from his behavior. I have heard all the anti tanky retoric but while I don't go for communism I have by and large treated fine on the communities (the only thing I encountered was being banned from a community for "supporting" landlords but hey I got banned from another instance for using a term I might consider crass but otherwise common for it being considered a slur so to me its all a sensitivity issue). I am getting quite sick of blocking his alts and his motivations are not exactly good. That being said its laughable to use the term liable in a largely anonymous online setting like this. That being further said it is a problem but i not sure what to do about it.

I will do the thing I should and break this apart a bit. Anyway I just want to add a bit of my own experience as I think it adds a bit more to how his behavior is problematic. I asked if he was looking to post the comic I post daily and he said no. I asked if he would as I would stop posting if he was diligent about doing it but he said not he only crossposts and can't be bothered to go out of his way to do it himself. I had experimented before when I thought he was a bot and found what I posted was crossposted within the hour but would not get posted if I did not post. At one point I screwed around a bit to try and poison his cross posts and this is really funny. He would go through all the work even if I did not post the link. I was posting comments about the comic for the day and talking around it and he would go and get the url and do the post properly. But only if I posted something! I mean it was kinda funny sad. I mean sad that he was this way. I sorta felt sorry for him. Anyway I could not keep it up and went back to posting in a standard way. Since I just block his alts as I see them. It is problematic but I honestly don't know how we can deal with people that have mental problems. I have a brother who lives in a halfway house and you feel a bit bad about people he may interact with in a typical day but he has just enough ability to function and his issues are not really his fault as he is sick. I like the idea of not allowing disparaging but its a slippery slope. Discussions need to be made about defederation and at what point discussion is disparaging could be hard to say. I could see maybe a rule like that which is exempt in defederation threads.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
0 points (50.0% liked)

Rant

483 readers
1 users here now

A place where you can rant to your heart's content.

Rules :
  1. Follow all of Lemmy code of conduct.
  2. Be respectful to others, even if they're the subject of your rant. Realize that you can be angry at someone without denigrating them.
  3. Keep it on Topic. Memes about ranting are allowed for now, but will be banned if they start to become more prevalent than actual rants.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS