69

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/58347995

BOYCOTT NIKE!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Nikes are bar none the worst shoes people try to have me repair. They are made from shitty criminally overpriced plastic and foam that decomposes and falls apart in the box let alone after someone wears them

[-] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

Nikes - made for children by children.

[-] sheridan@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

What shoes do you recommend? Looking to get a new pair soon.

[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

From my point of view athletic shoes aren't really a thing that can be effectively repaired because even the nice ones use plastics that aren't easy to work with after they've been worn. I can usually do something but its sentiment that keeps them going not quality. But really the lesson I try to teach people is to not give a fuck about the name on the shoe. It vastly more important to know how a shoe is supposed to fit on your foot and that it feels comfortable long term.

Edit: I will add a few names to avoid pretty much entirely though. Post-1988 Cole Haan (owned by Nike), Louis Vuitton and Ecco

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

To elaborate on the "go for the fit, not the name", there's a common belief that shoes need some time to break in before they feel comfortable. This is only true if you get shoes that don't really fit your foot. There's more to feet variations than just the length. I learned that the first time I got lucky and one of the few shoes I was trying on in my mad dash to get shoes and go do something else asap fit my foot properly. It immediately made me realize that I need patience when getting shoes and to never buy a shoe that doesn't feel great right away.

If you're going for a designer shoe, I bet the odds of it perfectly fitting your foot are low, unless maybe you have the same foot type as Michael Jordan or whichever athlete's name they are putting on the shoe, assuming that athlete's foot was even part of the design at all. For all we know, they rip those shoes off as soon as the cameras aren't watching because it was purely a marketing thing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] comador@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I have a pair of redwings I've had repaired 3x over the last 14 years. They're expensive, but worth adding to the list.

[-] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

No one is cross shopping Nike sneakers and red wing boots. That's apples to oranges.

[-] alcibiades@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Lemmy try not to give incredibly out of touch fashion advice challenge: impossible

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

About once every few weeks, I'll go visit my local blacksmith and he'll nail a new pair of pair of shoes right on to my giant toenail. Or maybe he repairs the old ones. I'm not too sure, he doesn't really tell me much. He just stands in places that make it really hard to kick him, and I only really wanted to do that the first time because I thought he was trying to steal my feet.

[-] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sir, this is not a place for horses.

[-] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

I wouldn't expect any sneaker to be repairable. I switched to OnCloud and love them, Hoka is another solid brand.

For repairable shoes, leather Goodyear welt is where to start. Best entry level brand is Thursday Boot company, but Redwing is super popular too.

[-] Oofnik@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

If you're talking about easily available running shoes, there are still select New Balances that are union made in the US (as of a couple of years ago).

If you're looking for just sneakers, there are a ton made in Europe you can get shipped to north america! I have Vegas at the moment

load more comments (4 replies)

Of course a sweat-shop owner is a republican.

[-] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago

I resolved never to buy or wear Nike back in the late 90s. The companies practices are abominable but I also hated the culture of conspicuous consumption and the way people believed it gave them license to shit on others for not turning themselves into a walking ad. I grew up poor, so I know the feeling of being made to feel less-than because I got Pro Wings on instead of Jordans.

[-] ski11erboi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I know you said pro wings what are there any other brands you recommend? Is adidas any better? Been putting off buying new sneakers since Isreals genocide because every brand I looked at seemed to have some sort of ties.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

After the recent election? You can kiss that fucking money goodbye. Have fun losing big.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe he's also invested in the advertising agencies that the candidates will be spending their money with.

[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

What a piece of shit

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Why are old republicans so fucking weird looking.

While Knight is generally reluctant to give interviews, he spoke with the New York Times in October 2022 regarding his support for Republican candidates. He argued Oregon's government had drifted too far to the left and described himself as "more conservative than Nike," responding to criticism of him backing an anti-abortion candidate which apparently contrasted with the company's image of supporting progressive social justice causes.[109] Nike itself donated $75,000 to Drazan and Johnson's Democratic opponent, Tina Kotek, the eventual winner of the election. - WIKIPEDIA

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

Not just the old ones, many of them in the administration look super strange with even weirder views.

One looks like they fought a lawnmower at a barbershop and lost, another looks like a fanfic witch from The Matrix, several of them look like cast members from The Witch (movie), others have...odd features that make them look like WW2 villains or slightly methed out. And all of them are batshit insane.

You can't even find people like that in a big city.

[-] wavebeam@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Wow fuck that guy

[-] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

I can't boycott no harder, we haven't purchased a name brand in weeks!

[-] camdog2000@ttrpg.network 5 points 3 weeks ago

That's why their shoes are so expensive!

[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

Oh look, yet another example of why we should tax wealth and not work.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Evil really makes you look like a corroded ballsack

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

Bruh, I remember a few years ago (before covid) in my deep blue city public school, kids would make fun of you if your wear shoes that aren't nikes, especially like no name brand shoes or even sketchers.

Like wtf. Its highschool, so immature...

Some kids even got "designer" shoes or whatever for $500-$1000, like... the fuck?!?

Its shoes... 🤦‍♂️

Ugh, kids these days.

[-] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago

Vans or bust

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I remember in the late 80s and early 90s multiple kids were killed in the US over their shoes. Usually by people they knew.

When the designer luxury worship culture gets so bad that kids are killing each other over attaining it.. something major has to change.

Solution is to raise minimum wage, increase social support, and raise the poorest up out of poverty. These killings are incredibly rare in the rest of the developed world.

But thanks mostly to conservatives we know that this hasn't happened in the US, and kids who live in borderline poverty are still killing people for their designer sneakers. The only thing that's changed in 30 years is the brands.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 4 points 3 weeks ago

Because otherwise there would be a small risk that money would go to taxes instead and help people who need it.

[-] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

What're you saying? You don't think these billionaires need their money?!?

[-] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Does a dragon not need its golden hoard?

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

The dragon earned their hoard! Taking it away is Commie DEI!!!

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Republican are the ones that burned Nikes for sponsoring Colin Kaepernick....

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Imagine how many copies this sold

[-] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

"National Bestseller"

Only because the publisher astroterfed sales by ordering thousands of copies of their own book. I doubt anyone who would believe this hysterical bullshit is much of reader.

[-] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Like, four?

They’re not well known for buying books.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

BOYCOTT CAPITALISM

[-] negativenull@piefed.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

How does he go from this:

to supporting Trump and Oregon republicans?
It does not compute

[-] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Corporations are psychopaths. They don't need you to be republican, they just want your money to become more powerful. They say whatever you want to hear to get it.

[-] fireweed@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Pretty ironic, given that Oregon Republicans are best known for taking the ball and going home...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
69 points (97.3% liked)

News

33625 readers
756 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS