163

When it has been demonstrated over and over again, how little they think of anyone beneath them.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] folaht@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

At what point is someone wealthy using gapminder levels of income where level 1 is earning $2 a day, level 2 is $8, level 3 $32, etcetera?

And at what point is a person in power?

Is Zelensky in power? Xi Jinping?
Greta Thunberg? John Oliver? JT Chapman? Karl Marx? The admin of this site?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I'm aphantasic. Until people started really talking about how they "see" things in their heads, I assumed it was all just a figure of speech. Flashbacks, thought bubbles, daydreams in media... I assumed that was all just, you know, an easy way to get the information across. Now I know you freaks actually see stuff and the mind's eye isn't some convenient turn of phrase. Weirdos!

In a similar vein, I have empathy. It is difficult for me to intuitively understand the perspective of someone who doesn't have any. As an example, it's hard for me to understand a person who's exploiting children a la Epstein. And in truth, I don't want to understand them, either. Even knowing how many of them are the way they are... if I had a little less introspection, I'd probably just default to "they're just like us."

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

that isn't what empthy is.

epstein has empathy. it was just for donald trump and his friends and family. most people only have empathy for their immediate family and friends. that's normal. it's the scope and target of the empathy you have issue with.

[-] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Hm. I think that if you don't have empathy for more than your own immediate friends and family, you don't have empathy. You have concern over how other people's pain directly impacts you. That's egoism, not empathy.

Plus, Epstein considered all the rest of them targets too, just a different type.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bitcrafter@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago

most people only have empathy for their immediate family and friends. that’s normal.

Speak for yourself.

[-] ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I am not sure it is really about Capitalism but the broader human Centralization whatever its political or economic system. We Centralize and someone has to be at the top as that is our nature and those at the top exploit as power corrupts. This is wired into us a species and it has brought us a long way for better and for worse.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Maybe because they think one day they will be rich, so obviously rich people are still people.

But they will never be poor, because poor people aren't people.

[-] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Stockholm syndrome

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Some people are wealthy because they provide a valuable, well-paid skill (neurosurgeons, for example). Some people are in positions of power because they sincerely want to make their communities a better place.

Don't get me wrong, it's probably more likely to get there through sociopathic greed. But that doesn't mean they are all horrible people.

Are you talking about specific wealthy, powerful people?

[-] presoak@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 month ago

This isn't really a question.

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

they're just subs that are into bdsm

[-] Delilah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Financial domination

[-] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Hot take, we should deliberately dehumanize rich people.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
163 points (86.9% liked)

Asklemmy

51844 readers
579 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS