124
This is just how people richer than us browbeat companies into doing less and charging more because the data shows customers are willing to accept it.
And there's going to be dumbasses on the internet believing that you aren't getting good games because of feminism or minorities being represented, and if you get good games it's because we somehow eliminated all woke people or something.
3D Investment blames this on the underperformance of Square Enix’s console and mobile game sectors
No.
as well as exceptionally large write-downs related to cancelled games.
Yes.
Interestingly, they also consider the company’s arcade and publishing sectors to be “non-synergistic” businesses that are ultimately pulling down the company’s value with lackluster performance.
Fuck no.
Squenix's problem is that they keep going too big. They are trying to be a Sony or Nintendo, when they're really more of a Devolver. They have franchises with big fanbases, but they're trying to force their games to become COD levels of HUGE by just increasing the budget. And when the return doesn't keep up with investment, they keep missing the point.
It happened with Tomb Raider. It happened with Deus Ex. And it's happening with Final Fantasy. The games do have passionate fans, but they simply aren't for everyone. And that's not a bad thing.
What Squenix refuses to accept, is that they've hit a growth ceiling they can't break through by spending more. But instead of growing wider by diversifying with new IPs or more titles at more reasonable budgets, they keep trying to focus on their latest big thing and grow it taller and heavier than it can support.
Expedition 33 says there's a big appetite for what final Fantasy used to be, but they just won't rpg and have to make everything action for whatever reason. I blame Kingdom hearts.
The pixel remasters were terribly executed too. Way better than the mobile ports, but still awful compared to og, and weirdly inconsistent per platform.
The entirety of avengers was batshit crazy.
Point is, squeenix has many problems.
Maybe also selling off valuable IP for cheap to do NFTs wasnt an amazing idea i dunno
clutching of pearls intensifies
Or adding microtransactions to a single player game.
Or considering any franchise with an entry that has lost money dead and gone, as if it didn't still sell millions. Like, just budget the next one to fit the demand?
Or their total allergy to doing anything actually new. They keep shedding IPs yet only ever back existing franchises.
Or spending almost as much on marketing as development, as if you can just force people to be interested in a sequel for a game they didn't play or a genre they don't enjoy.
I don't know how Squenix games can be so full of developer passion with execs this braindead.
And what the fuck does 3D Investment mean their publishing is a loss? NO SHIT. THAT'S HOW YOU FIND THE NEW FRANCHISES.
VCs, as shitty as they are, at least get that backing 30 small projects makes sense because that improves your chances of being on board with the one that blows up big enough to pay for the rest.
this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
124 points (100.0% liked)
PC Gaming
12893 readers
277 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS