42
submitted 13 hours ago by Scotty@scribe.disroot.org to c/canada@lemmy.ca

[Op-ed by Maria Popova and Anastasia Leshchyshyn, both researchers at McGill University.]

When Canadians think about our neighbours, we generally think only of one: the United States. But we also have a neighbour to the North: Russia, whose proximity has only been enhanced by the effects of climate change on the Arctic.

And we need to shift our assumptions quickly. With the terms of Ukraine’s future now being determined, the kind of Russia that emerges from the Russo-Ukrainian war is the one Canada will meet in the Arctic.

...

However, despite our mental maps fooling us otherwise, the North does not end with us; the Russian neighbour just across the Arctic Circle is much closer than we tend to realize.

Last week’s speech by CSIS Director Daniel Rogers should jolt Canadians from their North American preoccupations and reorient our attention to Canada’s Arctic with warnings that Russia and China have “significant intelligence interests” in the region.

Word of Russian prowling in the Arctic is far from revelatory, and it has been suggested that Rogers’ address was a timely effort to shore up public support for the Carney government’s recent increases in defence spending. Yet “significant” was also the adjective selected by Rogers to describe Russia’s military presence in the Arctic, and the state itself was notably characterized as remaining “unpredictable and aggressive.”

...

In a speech delivered in Kyiv on Ukraine’s Independence Day in August 2025, Prime Minister Mark Carney offered an assessment of Russia’s imperial ambitions in Ukraine: “We see this war clearly, as a horrific act of aggression, a maniacal quest to recreate a history that itself was filled with injustice, and we know that peace will only come through strength.”

Canadians are perhaps not as clearsighted in comprehending their own country’s proximity to this same aggressor, and even less so in their ability to predict or imagine how exactly Russian aggression might manifest to undermine Canadian interests.

...

To call Russia our neighbour would be to recognize that the outcome of the Russo-Ukrainian war has direct implications for Canadian security, and that support for Ukraine is a direct investment in our own defence, rather than a donation to a distant cause.

To call Russia our neighbour would be to induce a shift in Canada’s broader political calculus, by illuminating the scope of our susceptibilities and expanding our understanding of what the defence of our interests entails.

...

If Ukraine is defeated, Canada risks dealing with an emboldened, expansionist neighbour — and not just the one to our south.

...

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 4 points 6 hours ago

No and this is propaganda bullshit

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The US has viewed Canada as America's rightful property since 1775. Russia of course interested in on the Arctic seaways that are going to open up in the coming decades, but Canada 's greatest threat always has, and will continue to be, its Southern neighbor. Russia won't need anything from the Northwest Territory or Nunavut for the same reason that the UK isn't horribly concerned with shipping lanes off the coast of Norway.

[-] badmancrooks@lemmy.ca 30 points 13 hours ago

I'm more concerned about the neighbor that has verbally expressed a desire to use economic means to pressure Canada into agreeing to be annexed only to become a territory with no representation while they've also enacted a decades long propaganda campaign to destabilize one of our most resource rich regions with pro-separatist messaging? If Canada is the Ukraine, then Alberta is Crimea in 2014 and Russia is the United States, bro.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 15 points 12 hours ago

Historically Russia has questioned our sovereignty and claims our Arctic is theirs.

But the US is the bigger enemy.

[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 9 points 12 hours ago

The russia and the US are becoming allies.

[-] badmancrooks@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago

Trump famously drew a line straight across Ontario and Quebec, presented this map on international news and said that the border was an arbitrary line based on bad old deals, effectively making everything East of Brampton, the United States. I didn't really exaggerate almost any of what I just said.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago

Plot twist, Russia and America work together to swing Canada one way or another before they fight each other for Canada.

[-] AGM@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 hours ago

Don't even need to read one paragraph down before being able to correctly guess this is another propaganda piece pushed by Scotty Sockpuppet.

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

Yeah sure. Russia will decide to attack us before the former URSS entities. This article is just propaganda. I guess to push us to the 5% of GDP Trumo want for us instead of assessing the right percentage for our situation

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 9 points 13 hours ago

I don’t think the US would allow that to happen, not because they are our allies, but because when push comes to shove, they think of Canada as within their area of influence.

This is supported by the fact that they have Alaska there, which is very, very close to Russia.

Letting Russia chew through Europe would mean EU has less influence in global politics, that’s not really a factor with Canada.

What I mean is that we should be on guard but imo US will always be a greater threat to our sovereignty than Russia, as the latter already has undisputed partial access to the arctic but the US does not.

[-] Threeskittiesinatrenchcoat@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Considering Trump just relaunched Monroe 2.0, this is the correct answer.

We're in what the American administration considers their sphere of influence. This is going to be true no matter what our relationship with the US is, friend or foe.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 3 points 12 hours ago

They may team up

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

I agree.

Letting Russia chew through Europe would mean EU has less influence in global politics, that’s not really a factor with Canada.

And this whole proxy war against Russia has been not that bad of a deal for the US, which is why it's so regrettable that the US is now withdrawing its support.

But letting Russia encroach via Canada is basically the opposite situation of letting the US (through NATO) encroach via Ukraine. Their stupid golden dome is not as effective if Russia can just move underneath.

[-] Scotty@scribe.disroot.org 3 points 13 hours ago

Just today, Russia's state-controlled propaganda agency TASS cited Alexander Moiseev, the head of the Russian Navy, who said that, according to him, NATO countries have significantly stepped up their spying activities in the Arctic.

Moiseev was quoted as saying that anti-submarine aircraft based in Iceland had become much more active, a reference TASS said to U.S., British and Canadian surveillance planes.

Moiseev, who also spoke of NATO plans to deploy strategic surveillance drones in Finland, was cited as saying that NATO’s aim was to contain Russian activities in the Arctic.

So the U.S. may be a threat, but so is Russia. And don't forget China which is seeking access to the Arctic as well.

[-] mrbn@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago

No, they won't. Russia won't risk going to war with NATO (mentioned in the article). Now if they try the "grey-zone" tactics, who's to say they're not already doing that with Canada and many other countries..

[-] r8KNzcU8TzCroexsE2xbWC@lemmy.ca 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

That presumes that NATO will continue to be an effective deterrent. I’m not convinced that’s the case in the coming years.

[-] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 3 points 12 hours ago

While the US is a very big chunk of NATO, it's not ALL of NATO. And while the US has certainly betrayed its principles, the other members seem to be waking up to that fact.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

The new Trump Doctrine national security strategy document (the same one that attacks Europe for being too woke) is all about how the Western Hemisphere is theirs and does not identify Russia as a US adversary. Corollary: we already have a pimp.

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

if FNV has taught me anything, the supply lines through the arctic will basically make this impossible.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago

Russia can't even

[-] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca -1 points 12 hours ago

Russia is far down the list of countries most likely to invade Canada.

this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
42 points (83.9% liked)

Canada

10745 readers
387 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS