[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 3 points 52 minutes ago

Would be nice if Rachel Gilmore migrated away from X and Substack... she does such great work though, it makes sense to still publish on Shorts/TikTok but she has enough resources to learn from Molly White

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well thats a false analogy

Why? I think it hits the point just right, so much so that you immediately tries to pivot away from the question you made.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes. The answer is “there are as many genders as there are colours”.

There exist more than two colours so the answer is not two

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

some people say there are hundreds of genders, hence its pseudoscientific

You are being really stubborn about accepting that gender has a proper and scientific view, probably because the scientific consensus is not saying what you think it should be saying

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

but you think it righteous to punish someone for a wrong answer?

Why do you believe this is what’s happening? What parts of what this guy had as evidence against him that you think should get protected as free speech? Quote something specific that was raised as evidence

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

He did me one better. His hard work paid for some financial literacy so I’m grateful

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago

Owning a home is the best investment you’ll make in your life.

Sure grandpa, let’s take you to bed

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Convince you of what makes sense? You seem to think Mr Neufeld was fined for saying “there are two genders” but that’s not what he said.

Do you know the statements that made evidence for the trial in the first place, before asking for being convinced of anything?

Edit:

ask anyone off the street and you’ll get a random number

this is a like asking how many colors are there in the rainbow. Most people will name 5 to 7 colors, but the answer is “all visible colors, which is a spectrum and not a set amount; the fact that we usually name the common ones doesn’t mean we there exists 7 colors only”. The reason this question doesn’t have a right answer isn’t that “we can’t agree on it”; everyone who understands gender agrees the question itself is wrong because it starts from bad assumptions.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

and I hope Im not fined for saying so.

lol poor soul, must be so hard living under the threat of persecution!!

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

But I do understand the tradition of not voting down on first reading.

Tradition shouldn’t come before a basic filter for platforming hate

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 82 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I will shortly be declaring a National Emergency on Electricity within the threatened area. This will allow the U.S to quickly do what has to be done to alleviate this abusive threat from Canada.

This shit is ominous. This demon is ready to invade and take control of the Québec-Windsor corridor.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 88 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cool story but that is what Americans chose, yes. It’s your representative. Americans might not hate Canadians, but Americans only love themselves and will eventually learn that this leads you to behave selfishly and be hated.

7
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by villasv@lemmy.ca to c/bicycles@lemmy.ca

I've been going back and forth a few apps. Apple Maps and Google Maps fail me too often suggesting me to take streets without bike lanes. With OsmAnd I'm able to mark a few roads as "Avoid", but I end up marking half my city and sometimes I do need to go one block or two on those streets.

Is there an app that allows me to to plan a route explicitly prioritizing AAA lanes that works in Vancouver?

view more: next ›

villasv

joined 2 years ago