91
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/canada@lemmy.ca

Canada’s political and media class has spent years chasing convenient villains to blame for the housing crisis, pointing the finger at foreign buyers, immigrants, supply shortages, zoning rules, or an overheated market.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Every MP and MLA is a real estate investor and that's what is driving all of this madness. A home used to be a place for your family to live, for generations. Now, it's a quarterly, profit-driven investment.

Homes should be homes, not speculation.

[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

I'll vote for you if this is your platform!

[-] velindora@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 days ago

Well shit if we are pitching platforms, I’d like a chance to run

[-] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Maybe no one will vote for you. You haven't said anything to differentiate yourself from the current group of selfish opportunistic politicians we have.

[-] velindora@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago

Well, free mental healthcare is at the top of my list

[-] orioler25@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

This is not a new thing, access to housing has always been a fundamental mechanism of control in settlers colonial states. This was only recognised as a real problem once it affected privileged groups who have experienced enough generational wealth to normalize homeownership.

You're right, most representatives who make our decisions on housing happen to be members of a privileged class which is actively invested in profiting off that control. It does not end at housing, the exact problem with reform in a capitalist system is the link between privilege and material wealth ensures that the interests of capital remain paramount in society.

[-] Sunshine@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I would say most instead of “all”

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

Canada's big banks rake in so much interest money it's sickening. The banks want the economy to suffer so more borrowing can be done. It works at odds with societal progression for the citizenry. In retrospect, we sure fucked up by choosing capitalism..

[-] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Capitalism chose us

[-] Sunshine@piefed.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Switch to your credit unions folks!

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Government is a bigger player, they are expanding existing metropolises instead of building new metropolises.

Instead of providing incentives for housing in suburbs around Toronto and Ottawa they could increase taxes on those cities to build a new one halfway between them, connect it via high speed rail. Then use the increased taxes in the other cities to offset taxes in the new one.

[-] ODGreen@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Nobody wants to live in Kingston, come on.

[-] Chlumbo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

This made die laughing hahaha

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That’s halfway by road not halfway.

Also Belleville is closer to half on the 401 than Kingston.

[-] ODGreen@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Even worse.

To be serious, the new Alto high speed rail line will go through Peterborough. Could be that it helps spur some development there.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

The problem with Peterborough is kicking the people out to start building apartments and have no low density housing in the city.

That’s why it must be in an undeveloped place.

[-] ODGreen@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

I really don't see why we can't infill Toronto and Ottawa. Make single-family home builds illegal, only triplexes or bigger. Kill off parking minimums. Expropriate demolition-by-neglect sites and abandoned commercial property. Same thing with Peterborough if we want that built up. Building a metropolis from scratch usually ends up awful anyway, see Brasilia as a notorious example (in James C Scott's Seeing Like a State.

[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

As someone who lives in Peterborough, and has to look at the burned-out husk of the Baskin Robbins Ice Cream building every day and wonders "Why the hell isn't this housing?", I can agree with all of this.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

As seen in China, it only makes sense to build the city and then move people in. Intermittent building causes inefficiency as you have to build around people and people have to work around building.

Infilling keeps Canada separate and limited. As per the above we have to put the GTA people somewhere while we demo their homes.

If we can string together cities across Canada with rail that has a 30 minute to 1 hour between stops then it makes Canada function much stronger logistically and muvh more defensible.

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
91 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10754 readers
500 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS