I would imagine the class would be aDog and when you instantiate it the variable would be theDog.
"the dog" maps to dog, the = maps to "is now", and Dog() maps to "a dog", and (name="Dog name") maps to "with name dog name"
So no, you're wrong, lmao
I've already written the transpiler
And that brings us back to BASIC.
fuckoing
meh, close enough
to me method names are imperatives, like when we order the dog to walk.
dog.walk() = "Dog, walk!"
That Pepe is cursed
[lady for lady in ladies if lady.is_single] just doesn't have the same bop.
list comprehensions aren't changed much. but a statement like dog = Dog(name="fido") is transpiled to the dog is now a Dog with name 'fido'
the language uses backticks for strings. it handles nested stringly nicely because of it
perl is garbage and larry wall is barely fluent in english. that man does NOT know how to name things.
EDIT: i kid i kid, he definitely speaks english
With the Lingua::Perligata module you can write your perl in Latin instead. My coworker says it's more readable that way if you know Latin.
not gonna work, i took two years of german in HS and one year of spanish in college.
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
