72

Looking for an alternative to Microsoft Office for the Linux.

I've already tried:

  • LibreOffice (It doesn't have the same experience as Microsoft's apps.)
  • OnlyOffice Desktop Editors (I like it)

What else would you recommend?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago

Once you get used to libreoffice ms office will feel like a gimmicky toy

[-] semperverus@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

You haven't used LibreOffice's pivot tables have you?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TCB13@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago

Stick with LibreOffice , you'll get used and it is most likely the best alternative.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] crusty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 years ago

You can easily change LibreOffice to have a tabbed layout like MSOffice (view > user interface). The only thing to note is that LibreOffice has great documentation, but it can be a bit difficult to follow with a different layout.

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago

Nothing has exactly the same experience as MS. I don't think there is a clone project for it.

The two you listed are your best options.

Does LibreOffice have any issues that prevent you using it? If not, it's probably that your expectations are set by your comfort and familiarity with Office and that is the problem you need to solve.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maybe@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago

You could always do in-browser Office if nothing else works. Or g-suite

[-] KRAW@linux.community 7 points 2 years ago

I can't speak for the whole suite, but Excel sucks in the browser. The browser version do not have all the same features as desktop. I only use Office if I'm forced to and use LibreOffice or Latex otherwise

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mypasswordis1234@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Over my dead body...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] anders@rytter.me 10 points 2 years ago

@mypasswordis1234
OnlyOffice is good. Very similar to MS office

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Matty_r@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago

I think you'll be pretty disappointed with anything else that's available. Of those two I'd say stick with OnlyOffice.

[-] EunieIsTheBus@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

honestly, I've only clicked on this post because of your username

"Foss Microsoft Office for Linux actually it isn't in Opensource"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] otter@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

Is there a reason a few are being developed rather than focussing on one? Are there key differences/use cases for each of them?

LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice vs. OnlyOffice

I remember once reading that one of them (or some other FOSS alternative) was bad for privacy/FOSS, but I can't find that anymore

[-] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 11 points 2 years ago
[-] thesmokingman@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago

Basically the only commits to OpenOffice now are things a full project lint would catch. There are some security updates here and there. Last I looked it’s basically one dev fixing spacing.

[-] UniDestroyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 years ago

Forkers gonna fork. OnlyOffice seemed like it was going after Google Docs, but with a MSOffice look and feel. The live sharing and editing worked well when I tested it.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Ah I see. So LibreOffice for local stuff, then OnlyOffice for the google docs type of work

[-] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not quite. OnlyOffice has an offline/local suite too. When most people talk about OnlyOffice, they are usually referring to the local suite.

OnlyOffice has better compatibility with MS Office file formats (and a similar UI), so some people prefer it over LO.

The downside is that because the UI is written in HTML5, it's slow and sometimes clunky compared to LO, which is (mostly) a native app. This is especially visible with large spreadsheets - OO takes a long time to render them, whereas in LO they open in a reasonable time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 years ago

I remember once reading that one of them (or some other FOSS alternative) was bad for privacy/FOSS, but I can't find that anymore

Not sure if you're thinking of WPS Office (formerly known as Kingsoft Office). It's development is funded by the Chinese government, but although Kingsoft claim that the Linux version is developed by the community, they haven't really published the source code anywhere, so it's considered a high-risk software.

[-] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

It's bloatware and adware imo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] raptir@lemdro.id 2 points 2 years ago

Why did Linus start developing Linux when he could have just contributed to FreeBSD which already existed?

[-] theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me 5 points 2 years ago

No, it didn't. FreeBSD didn't exist until 1993. 386BSD wasn't until 1992. Linus has said that if a free, unencumbered BSD for PCs existed in 1991, he indeed would not have made Linux.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
72 points (81.6% liked)

Open Source

35833 readers
270 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS