101
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DampSquid@feddit.uk 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Make rego 10x for these yank tank wanks

[-] SarahFromOz@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Ban Ford Rangers at least. The drivers tend to be inconsiderate psychos.

They can ride eBikes instead.

[-] Salvo@aussie.zone 17 points 1 week ago

Ban F-trucks, Silverados and RAMs.

I saw an F350 Super Duty parked in a suburban mains street the other day.

It is so big, it needed Interstate Heavy Vehicle plates. It was not a tradies Utes; It was not a Tow Vehicle, It wasn’t even an Oversized Load pilot. It was just compensating someone’s inadequacy.

It had a sticker on the window “Patriotism is not Racism” and it looked like a MAGA sticker but with an Australian Flag instead of the Stars and Stripes.

With all my heart, I wanted to get a paint marker and write “GAGYGF Seppo Cunt”, but I was on work uniform and did not have a paint pen. Also, I am not a complete arsehole.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago

Make an anger management course part of the requirements to register one.

[-] Longmactoppedup@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Currently I think it's the other way around. Before you are allowed to own one you sign a contract saying you will at every opportunity drive millimetres from the bumper of the car in front.

[-] DampSquid@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago
[-] prex@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

I saw the sticker on one of them modified to say 'pinger'.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Increasing the weight of the car by 2x increases the road damage by 16x.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_power_law

[-] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

We should charge rego by weight and volume. We should measure safety by damage inflicted, not damage deflected.

[-] TheHolm@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago

We already to. IMHO rego is weight based.

[-] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Rego is weight-based, but it's utterly fucked.

My 900kg hatchback costs $149 more to register than a ute up to 4500kg out in the country.

In the city, the rego difference is $1.10.

https://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/registrations/fees-and-charges/vehicle-fees#registration-renewal-fees-for-light-motor-vehicles

What's worse, their FAQ says a lot of TAC claims for utes are paid by workcover, not the TAC. That's why it's cheaper.

...so people who purchase a roadblimp to use for school dropoffs are dodging the TAC charge, whilst being a much larger hazard than everyone else.

https://www.tac.vic.gov.au/about-the-tac/our-organisation/transport-accident-charge?drop=6

[-] TheHolm@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

I did not realize that rego is state specific. IMHO NSW has most sane method.
In NSW your hatchback will cost $270 and 3 tonne SUV $949. https://www.nsw.gov.au/driving-boating-and-transport/vehicle-registration/fees-concessions-and-forms/vehicle-registration-fees

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tau@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Depends on the state. NSW for example is one that does vary depending on weight (based on weight ranges, not a full sliding scale) - there's a ~$180 difference between my sedan and van due to the van's higher tare weight placing it in the next category up. QLD on the other hand is one that doesn't - they charge based on the cylinder count instead.

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Why is rego on a little i20 so damn expensive then

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 11 points 1 week ago

First, the “SUV loophole”: under US law, most SUVs are classified as light trucks, meaning they’re subject to less stringent fuel-efficiency and crash-safety standards than passenger cars.

This has always been baffling to me. Make the standards universal and I reckon people would make very different choices.

[-] Seagoon_@aussie.zone 10 points 1 week ago

just remove the tax rebate/incentive

[-] prex@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago

Could it be so simple?
Pretty much yes.

[-] Funky_Beak@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago

If the vehicle has RANGER on the back i just automatically assume they are a cunt.

[-] comrade19@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Ranger Raptor RUGGED X TUFF BLACK BLOKE EDITION

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rcbrk@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Zero BAC requirement for vehicles exceeding various hazard thresholds? Say, 2.5T GVM, vehicle width/length, and a particular vision path requirement.

[-] Tenderizer@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago

I'm guessing the sales of emotional support vehicles would drop overnight with that policy.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] shirro@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

Speed limit Rangers to 40kph within city limits. They usually speed through school zones and roadworks so it won't slow them down but we might get a few disqualified from driving which will help.

[-] Insekticus@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

Smaller cars and tax the ultra wealthy. Really not that complex.

[-] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Pretty early the article points out that the top selling car in 2011 was far smaller than the best selling car now, in 2025, a Ford Ranger

It then says:

Four in five new cars sold in Australia are SUVs or utes – more than double the share of 20 years ago.

And follows up by pointing out two parts of US legislation that are driving manufacturing in the US to produce larger cars and ends by pointing out the extra risks with larger cars and how the situation can be improved using local legislation.

Why does the article ignore that the 2011 top selling car was from an Asian manufacturer and that Asian and European manufacturers exist. I went looking for data on sales from regions / brands over time but failed a bit. Anyone want to fill in the gaps? Obviously Mazda is no longer selling the top selling model and Ford is, but was there a swing in sales to Ford, a consolidation of sales on one model or maybe more that people that loved Ford just started buying the bigger cars? Any chance someone knows of some sort of data that helps fill in the gaps?

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Replace petrol taxes with a formula based on miles driven and weight of car.

[-] Tenderizer@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People are surprisingly unkeen on tracking in their car. So kilometers driven wouldn't work.

I'd say just go with a fee based on the weight of the vehicle, exponential of course. We need fewer heavy cars, fewer kilometers driven will be a side effect. And as a bonus effect maybe I'd be able to buy an EV without a range that's 8 times what I actually need.

[-] rcbrk@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Eh, people can submit odometer readings once a year with their rego renewal.

Honesty based should be good enough. Penalties can apply if you're caught tampering or severely underreporting.

[-] Salvo@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Odometer reading is a relatively unobtrusive metadatum.

It is recorded when the vehicle is serviced so it is already in someone’s database.

If kms travelled had to be reported annually at the time of registration, no-one will complain (except sov-shit cookers, and they don’t pay rego anyway).

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Have you actually driven outside the city here? I need the 400km my EV has to get between capital cities

[-] rcbrk@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

A child’s skull doesn’t know whether it’s steel or lithium making up that extra 0.5T.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A child got by my small long range EV would be more likely to survive than one hit by a similar weight internal combustion vehicle as mine is a car (with proper pedestrian safety) and the other would be much higher and larger.

A child still cares that the front of the vehicle is low, that it doesn't have a bull bar. A kid would be better off hit by an electric car than by a landcruiser

A 2t EV is much smaller than a 2t diesel

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Double the price of gas. Problem will solve itself.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

We have done more than that over the thirty years. It hasn't helped.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dumbass@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

Let us bully them again, these dipshits with their shit over sized vehicles used to be publicly mocked for their insecurities, bring that back and you will see a drop in sales for them, shame works wonders.

[-] hanrahan@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Rest of is could vote Green

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I thought that was specifically a North American issue. Damn. Stay safe pedestrians (those drivers of too-large vehicles won't even see you when they run you over)!

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Big fan of fire

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
101 points (99.0% liked)

Australia

4692 readers
110 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS