23
submitted 6 hours ago by ryujin470@fedia.io to c/gaming@beehaw.org
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 10 points 6 hours ago

To a certain extent, this is the equivalent of being shocked that Intel discontinued 386 production. Or that Google is no longer manufacturing Pixel 3s. It's the nature of the industry.

[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 hours ago

Yes and no. Yes in that OLED is a mostly-better technology, but no in that having more price options is almost always better for the end user.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 5 hours ago

If they've got their heart set on an LCD model, it looks like eBay has a number of secondhand ones.

I don't own a Steam Deck or intend to


I have more than enough portable electric devices capable of running games that I lug around already


but if I were going to get one, it looks like the OLED model has a 25% larger battery, which would be interesting to me.

[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

I'm not 100% but I'm pretty sure the bigger battery is there to compensate for the increased power use of the OLED rather than being supplementary. Keep in mind, the OLED is also a 50% step-up in refresh rate up it likely just balances out. There's likely a plethora of reviews out there that quickly confirm that, or prove me full of it. Either way...

[-] any1th3r3@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 hours ago

All other things being equal (same game, settings and refresh rate / fps limit), the OLED and LCD models have comparable power draw.
If anything, the OLED max power draw at 15W TDP is lower, usually around 23W max versus 26/27W for the LCD iirc.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Based on the screenshot in the article, the OLED model has longer playtime; Valve says that the LCD model has "2-8 hours of gameplay" and the OLED "3-13 hours of gameplay".

Though they do also say that this is "context-dependent", and I'm sure that you can come up with pathological cases for each. Like, a game that has a nearly all-white screen and runs at 90 Hz is probably relative worst-case for the OLED in terms of battery life, and a game that has a dark screen and runs at a locked framerate of 60 Hz is probably relative worst-case for the LCD.

[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 3 hours ago

I fully agree. Industry is simply not set up for a sustainable model in which price-conscious consumers can stay in the game.

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 2 points 4 hours ago

Yea the price jump of $400 to $550 kinda hurts.

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 5 points 4 hours ago

The oled model is roughly the same price as the original Steam Deck launched. And there are so many improvements, not just screen and battery. And given that other devices get more expensive over time, and with the higher RAM prices than before, its actually a good price; relatively speaking.

[-] termus@beehaw.org 2 points 3 hours ago

The touch pads and touch screen are sooooo much better. They drove me a little nuts when I had my LCD.

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 1 points 30 minutes ago

I have nothing negative to say about the Touch Pads, in fact I fall in love. But the Touch Screen is not very good, especially compared to who good touch works on smartphones in example. Didn't know it was improved too!

[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, that's not exactly an insubstantial increase.

[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 3 hours ago

Inflation is a bitch. That's tame compared to, say, beef.

this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
23 points (96.0% liked)

Gaming

33306 readers
104 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS