12

Three years ago, the global auto industry was gripped by a collective hallucination. CEOs promised us that the internal combustion engine would be dead by 2035 and that legacy automakers were just one battery factory away from a trillion-dollar valuation.

That narrative has now collided with economic reality.

In this video, we analyze the collapse of the "inevitability" narrative. We look at why Ford has been forced to take a staggering $19.5 billion write-down, why the European Union is quietly dismantling its own petrol ban, and why—despite billions in subsidies—automakers are still losing $6,000 on every electric vehicle they sell.

We examine how the industry confused a political project with consumer demand, leading to a market where the cars are too expensive for the middle class and too unprofitable for the manufacturers.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Why the hell would I wanna watch a video from some Irish hedge-fund-manager/YouTuber explaining his pet theory that 'industry moving to EVs rapidly is a collective hallucination', and how on earth is this 'climate news'?

This is shite.

[-] tio_bira@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Well, i live in a small town on Brazil northeast, everyday i see more and more eletric cars in the streets, even in the company i work they bought two.

Idk if this is local problem or is just u.s. vehicles, but the BYD cars are in constatly growing here and in neighbor towns on the region, even outside as my friend who travel to another state to see his brother told me.

[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Getting rid of diesel engines in trucking, agriculture and cargo ships is a hard engineering problem. Sodium might be cheap, but 40 MJ/l is a compelling argument.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 24 points 1 day ago

It is a US problem. They cut subsidies, do not let Chinese EVs in the market and Trump killed the laws of a lot of US states to end ICE sales 2035. The rest of the world sees higher EV sales. That is very much including the EU. They get cheaper every year and combustion engine sales are falling already.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

EVs in the US were introduced by Musk. He convinced his disciples EVs should be expensive and full of bullshit gadgetry. Various virgins moved from lining up for iPhones to lining up for Teslas. Then, he killed the brand with his Nazi beliefs. But the EV market in the US was saturated anyway. These are not practical vehicles for a second world country with poor infrastructure and governments corrupt with gas and oil.

With petrol subsidized so heavily, and the poor reliability of EVs, people will stick with gas cars.

Chinese EVs would just flood the market with poorly made cheaper vehicles, much like the 60s and 70s where cheap gas cars lasted 5 years, if you were lucky.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago

I mean cars are a bit of an impractical transportation method in general but I don't think EVs are much less practical in the US than any other vehicle nowadays. They're just too expensive for our crumbling middle class.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 hours ago

Even in parts of the country that are more receptive to future tech, the reality of range and lack of working charging infrastructure keeps coming back. Not range anxiety but range limitation. I have some friends that gave it a good college try and I mean real hard. It has complicated their lives too much. Having to get hotel rooms or waste time stopping to recharge and add hours onto trips. They try to look at it like pretend 1950s traveling and try to find places to go and things to do while the car recharges, but it wears on them. They don't plan on buying another EV, whenever they can afford to buy another car.

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
12 points (70.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7707 readers
408 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS