32

Economic concerns and growing disenchantment with both parties is draining support for Trump among Gen Z young men, a key bloc of support during the 2024 election

Male Gen Z voters are breaking with Donald Trump and the Republican party at large, recent polls show, less than a year after this same cohort defied convention and made a surprise shift right, helping Trump win the 2024 election.

Taken with wider polling suggesting Democrats will lead in the midterms, the findings on young men spell serious trouble for the Republican Party in 2026.

Younger Gen Z men, those born between 2002 and 2007, may be even more anti-Trump, according to October research from YouGov and the Young Men’s Research Project, a potential sign that their time living through the social upheavals of the Covid pandemic and not being political aware during the first Trump administration may be shaping their experience.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] fizzle@quokk.au 6 points 1 month ago

Who cares.

They will change their minds again.

Vote.

[-] rustyfish@piefed.world 1 points 1 month ago

Pretty much this. Anyone dumb enough to fall for this shit once, will fall for it again. 

[-] Gaja0@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

I was repulican christian in highschool, when Trump got elected and my church went MAGA, I started to ask a lot more questions. The scariest part about becoming woke is learning how much deception we're constantly fed and taking the step to say enough is enough.

People might be stupid, but they're mostly ignorant.

[-] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

voting got us here. now what. The next election may as well be fascist vs probably not a fascist

[-] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

My sister (F 22) voted for Trump over taxes, Haitian and Venezuelan immigrants. She is 1st gen, born of 2 immigrants who also voted for Trump. Every time I present new evidence of how bad Trump is, she pulls ChatGPT and "debunks my lies" with nicely crafted confirmation bias prompts. If you all know how to get through to GenZers, I am listening.

[-] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Any 22 year old who’s upset about taxes is very very clearly being manipulated

[-] DNS@discuss.online 3 points 1 month ago

Everyone should be upset how this country has lies to its citizens for decades on the premise of it can't "afford" free healthcare and education. It is not a generational problem, but a societal one.

Yet half this country joyfully would wallow in their own shit if it means their neighbor suffers just the same as they are.

[-] UltraMagnus@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

I kinda hate the premise that young age automatically makes you stupid or your opinions a result of manipulation. Someone in their 60s can be just as stupid as a 22yo, and a 22yo is also capable of having nuanced thoughts about politics and taxation. "Young=naive" is a bad trap to fall into when evaluating political opinions and feeds into the old adage about people becoming conservative as they get older.

I think this person is just stupid on their own, regardless of their age.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Considering the lack of value we're getting in return for these taxes, nah I'm pretty sure everybody should be upset about taxes. Other, better countries may pay more in taxes, but after accounting for the healthcare and worker rights that the taxes get them, they end up with more time and more money than most Americans.

I met a local politician who, in my red area, just seemed like he was dancing around labeling himself a Democrat. The office was for basically money management in the area, and he was talking about optimizing the use of tax funds. I made it clear that I don't really mind paying this tax rate, and I would even pay more, but only if it starts getting used on shit that matters like building another school because ours are getting overcrowded, and the area is growing whether we prepare or not. I said that even if I only cared about my own finances, that's an investment that supports growth which would raise my property value, and it would attract new businesses to serve that growing population. Just plan for it so that it doesn't grow out of control and become a shit hole with stupid intersection infrastructure and urban sprawl.

[-] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

We need to stop electing Republicans - the people who siphon away and steal our tax dollars

[-] sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org 3 points 1 month ago

my dude, you have a sister who is going to chatgpt for facts, Id feel that she's in a lot more trouble than being a trump supporter.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Ask her to read the links from her ChatGPT queries with you. Do it together. Show her how ChatGPT is confidently and convincingly lying to her. And each time she comes back with another result from a biased prompt, do it again. Eventually she'll at least stop trying to convince you that ChatGPT knows all, out of embarrassment.

[-] big_slap@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

have the AI cite it sources for the claims it makes, and read through those sources. ask the AI what information it used in the source to come up with its statement.

using chatGPT in this way is like how I used Wikipedia growing up: just pull up an article on something, check out what citations an article had, and walk it backwards from there

[-] eli@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

You can't help morons unfortunately.

My father is Gen 1 of immigrant parents. His parents HATED Trump. Yet he voted for Trump all three times.

I have a GenZ sister-in-law that uses ChatGPT for relationship advice. Like copies and pastes responses from men into ChatGPT and asks what they're "really saying" or "what their intentions are", instead of you know, JUST ASKING THE PERSON OUTRIGHT.

We're fucked

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] solduc@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago

Gen Z want a radical. Far left or far right doesn't seem to matter. I can't blame them for that. Most of them will still say they supported Bernie - at least the podcasters they worship do. There is room for them on the left. Dems have to start by leaving the centrist DNC bullshit behind.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

they don't want radical. they want jobs and a stabilized cost of living. they want to feel like they have a future.

trump focused on economic issues, and got their votes. if the next democrats can push forward economic reforms that improve the economy... they will get the votes. Kamala absolutely refused to run on any agenda of economic reform and endorse Biden's inflation economy.

[-] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Fair days wage for a fair days work IS radical in a world where 8 people hold 50% of the world's wealth

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

This was always true. I want someone who works for the working man and woman. I don't care if we become socialist, stay in capitalism, what the fuck ever other choice: we as people need to feel taken care of. Any system that ignores its people is doomed.

Just as important is explaining to people why some choices need to be made that we may not agree with. Raising the gas tax? I'm ok with it, because I already know it's how we pay for our roads. But what about my less aware neighbor? If they simply see the rate jump, and don't know why, it leaves the door wide open for a conspiracy schmuck to step in with a ragebait explanation.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Wish the system could ignore us when it comes to the bipartisan war on drugs.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, but you're being reasonable. Most human beings aren't reasonable. They are not thoughtful or pragmatic. Only a small percentage of people are well-mannered and educated enough to even understand the basics of macroeconomics and public policy that often drives it.

They are driven by raw emotion that is often entirely disproportionate to the thing it's responding to. Like your example of someone flying into a rage over a minor tax increase. And now in 2025+, these people think they are all geniuses due to a steady diet of social media that constantly reinforces their ignorant and rage. And they block and assault anyone who dares try to dispute their rage and ignorance.

I was in thread about credit ratings yesterday and all the smart factually accurate commentary was down-voted, and all the ragebaiting ignorance conspiracy nonsense was heavily upvoted.

[-] solduc@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

I think GenZ might just be stupid if they thought Trump had a more economic reform agenda than Harris. But yeah blame Harris for that too.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

trump ran on economic issues. they weren't stupid. they listened to what he said. they just didn't think he was lying.

'no tax on tips' was resonated with a lot of young service workers. he kept hammering home how he'd stop inflation, etc.

[-] solduc@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Fair enough. You are right that "ran on" and actual policy are two different things. Pretty clear that Harris fumbled her economic messaging when it comes to what GenZ were wanting to hear I guess.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

I think most people want a radical.

The current system isn't working for the majority of normal people.

They'll vote for change every time, and never get it.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I'll believe it when I see it.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It's just the nature of the population who will flock towards an authoritarian, they're not making rational, thought-out choices, they're JUST following a narrative of feelings. It could flip 180-degrees the next day and they will go with that new storyline if it validates their anger or frustration or just the need to follow a soap-opera of pundits and angry shouting people on TV.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

toolate.com/morons

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

It only matters if they vote.

[-] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Eh. For people choosing to vote for a fascist or sit out the election, the better choice is to sit it out. We should accept the little victory of them not voting at all if the alternative was Trumpism

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

As a Gen Z American Citizen, I was NEVER ever maga

And I'm proud to say that I've never been fooled, not even once.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No one recruits for the right like the people in these comments do.

Edit: if you are going to down vote me at least explain why telling them to fuck off is a better strategy then capitalizing on this and bringing them into the fold.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 month ago

Any reason for this? Higher education? Developing brain? I mean, whatever the reason, it's good. I'm just curious as to why.

[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Half of Gen Z doesn't remember a time when Trumpism wasn't normal. They don't know how the economy should be, how diplomacy should be, anything. They just heard Trump saying Biden was a pussy, and Biden acted like a pussy, so they believe Trump was the only reliable narrator. It took these people a great deal to overcome it - I heard a lot of younger people saying Trump was the peaceful, anti-war President. Now that they realize that was a lie, other dominoes are falling.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I heard a lot of younger people saying Trump was the peaceful, anti-war President.

This is such a big factor, imo.

The democrats refuse to budge from this neocon position of "benevolent interventionism." and Trump has been able to attack them over both parts of it, which allows him to appeal both to libertarian types who want to stay out of conflicts because "the government doing stuff is bad," and to nationalist types who want to just overtly plunder everywhere (with his actual policy being the latter). Meanwhile the democrats just cast anyone who disagrees with them on foreign policy as a Russian bot. They're stuck in the early 2000's where there was overwhelming bipartisan support for "bringing democracy" to the Middle East, and they seem think if they can just pick up the "moderate Republican" neocon voters who definitely exist and still believe in that project, then they're sure to win.

The effect is that they fail to capitalize on the ideological divisions that exist on the right. The actual Republican voters that there would be a chance of peeling off are the libertarian anti-war types, but that would require actually trying to appeal to anti-war voters instead of treating them with contempt.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's still crazy how many people want to write them off as lost causes already.

Those little idiots are going to be voting for decades, it's insane to stop trying to bring them around.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I genuinely can't fathom how folks mad at gen Z voters don't understand that their anger toward gen Z voters was equally manufactured as those gen Z voters support for Trump was.

How fucking stupid.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
32 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28438 readers
914 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS