148
Yes, Joe. You always were. You are the villain in the story that made all of this possible.
Yes but rogan's betrayal was not possible without the party forcing unwinnable strategies with the most unpopular choice, without a single challenge. None for house or senate either.
First thing is first, the dem party running opposition is multiplying this massive formula by zero right at the start.
Kamala was objectively a better choice than Trump, it was obvious to anyone who wasn't brain rotted by people like Rogan.
One day he's going to admit to being impacted by a traumatic brain injury as of decades ago.
I cannot fathom how a person can be this stupid and then he opens his mouth and blows my mind again and again and again.
One thing I've stopped being surprised about is how much stupider and meaner MAGA can be today than they were yesterday.
Going to be?
Joe Rogan, you have always been one of them, you fascist fuck. You helped create this and you will pay for your part in it.
When is Joe going to stop talking about and admonishing the collective and actually make it personally reflective? Even Schulz actually reflects on his personal error, but Joe cannot risk alienating his audience who supported it, or still do. He has to appear like the 'cool guy just asking questions', not the 'brainless idiot who got out of his depth and enabled fascism'. He can't stand the hit to his self image as a great judge of authenticity/bullshit (truly the most discrepant self image in media). So he adopts the standard comedian rhetorical trick used to build rapport: He talks in the passive, 'are we really that type of people' voice. It is an influencer mindset, obsessed with audience.
These guys are total frauds. They completely sold out, assuming they had principles before. They never shut up about Hopf's "hard times create strong men", because they clearly think these are the hard times and they are the strong MMA tough men, but there's no way life is hard for these pampered-ass multimillionaires living in their mansions, and if you took all that away we'd find out they're as soft as baby shit.
“going to be” ???
More leopards are metaphorically eating people's faces now more than ever. Seriously!
I notice you awkwardly wedge "seriously" into the end of a lot of your comments. What's up with that?
I actually have autism which is why I type like that. Still trying to work on the "putting 'seriously' in the end of my comments" stuff though.
All good bud, just wondered.
Thanks to the efforts of Joe Rogan, yes
even when he criticized the shooting he had to call Good crazy. she was a crazy person, apparently. he didn't even claim she tried to run him over, he said it looks like she was turning away from them. so what's crazy about her? what a fucking dumbass.
He doesn't get a pass on his past, but if it moves the needle on his followers, good. Better this than even more bootlicking. It's a crisis/war right now. Accounting can happen after.
Why does anyone give a shit about what dumb dumb Rogan thinks? A white dude with a microphone.
Because he has the ear of a lot of young men who disagree with us. He's a douche and an idiot, I dislike him and I lose respect for someone when they say they're a fan of his. But, a lot of the young right wing men who can be shown reason love him and trust what he has to say.
There are so many easy insults to sling at him and you chose racism?
Typically, reference to whiteness is a reference to white privilege, which is the product of a social power structure that benefits white people through the systematic oppression of non-white people, i.e. a racist power structure. So referring to someone as benefiting from a racist power structure is not racist.
It's somewhat, though not entirely, like how people born into generational wealth have privileges over people born into poverty. In this situation, it is indeed rather classist to refer to impoverished people as "the poors", but not classist to refer to the most wealthy as "the 1%"... Because the term calls out the priveleged group in the oppressive system.
Sure, because when some of them are like that they’re all like that, amirite?
this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
148 points (98.1% liked)
News
37284 readers
776 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS