240

The inability to use Adobe Creative Cloud on Linux is often cited as a major barrier for many users considering a switch to the platform. But perhaps, just perhaps, there has already been a breakthrough in that direction.

A community developer says they have resolved long-standing Wine compatibility issues that prevented Adobe Creative Cloud installers from completing on Linux, publishing a patchset and prebuilt binaries that they claim enable installation of Photoshop 2021 and Photoshop 2025.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Wilco@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 hours ago

I am a Krita user that works on Windows using whiskey or maybe cheap beer.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

....just Photoshop? Why does this text seem to conflate the words Creative Cloud and Photoshop?

[-] PokerChips@programming.dev -1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Not sure how I feel about wine these days. It brings things to Linux that has wonderful replacements now. We go to Linux to escape the gunk. Not to bring the gunk.

[-] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 13 points 5 hours ago

No-one is forcing you to install Adobe software. Stop crying about other people liking choices.

[-] PokerChips@programming.dev 1 points 18 minutes ago* (last edited 17 minutes ago)

Choice is good. Hate is bad.

[-] justmorg000@feddit.online 48 points 1 day ago

This would have been great like 10 years ago before Adobe fucked a decent product up with a subscription model and AI.

[-] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The good news is the old, non-subscription versions do work in Linux.

Honestly, unless you make a shitload of money off it, subscription Adobe products are just too rich for my blood.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

.....but why?

I guess if you have a ton of adobe specific assets and must be able to use adobe software because of legacy projects this might be useful but it just feels like tech debt.

coupled with the fact that tons of accessible software now can open psd and ai filetypes... :| hooray, I guess?

but for fuck's sake people get off the creative cloud it's turning into ai smog

[-] Horsey@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Affinity isn’t Linux compatible yet, and Gimp has a steep learning curve (the photoshop-ification plugin for new Gimp users isn’t well advertised)

[-] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

And also as good as gimp is, it's not a drag and drop replacement for photoshop, it's a venn diagram that's decently overlapping, ootb anyway

[-] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 76 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Would like to see some confirmation, but this is probably the #1 thing I see people say is holding them back.

[-] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 11 points 21 hours ago

Every day people, no. Mainly Youtubers.

[-] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 3 points 1 hour ago

Well... Youtubers (and other creatives) are the main awareness funnel for everyday people to hear about linux in the first place.

Creatives are typically stuck on windows because their workflow doesn't work on linux. And yes, they can change their workflow, but there's also a high time + effort cost to doing that which gets even higher for them since they still need to produce their works while switching.

[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 1 day ago

In hindsight, I'm so glad I couldn't get them working on linux, because it forced me to get my head around Darktable. I couldn't go back to Lightroom now...

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Why does everyone talk like Photoshop is the only program Adobe makes? Tell me, how does Darktable compare to Substance. Or Illustrator?

[-] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

Why does everyone talk like Photoshop is the only program Adobe makes?

It's because most professional creative jobs require raster image editing in at least some part of the production pipeline and photoshop fulfils that need in the adobe suite, so it's the most talked about product in that suite.


For linux, we have great:

  • Video editing (Davinci Resolve)
  • 3d (Blender)
  • Digital Art (Krita)

But raster image editing isn't in that list.

There's things like GIMP, but it's always behind photoshop. It only got non-destructive editing less than a year ago (which is what most serious creatives need to use), but photoshop's had that since CS2 back in 2005!

If someone actually wanted to beat adobe (e.g. the EU or wikimedia), they would have to pay for 20 developers to work on graphite and you'd probably have something better than GIMP or Inkscape after 7 years, something better than Affinity in 12 years, and something better than photoshop in 15 years.

[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

The only adobe software I used was photo editing, so Lightroom and Photoshop. I have no idea what their other apps do, or how they compare to linux equivalents

[-] Scoopta@programming.dev 39 points 1 day ago

Honestly I feel like that's very common with Linux. If you're willing to deal with the growing pain of switching it ends up working out better in the end, some people just don't want to deal with that or it's their job and they can't afford to deal with that. I'm sympathetic to the latter case, less to the former but that's just my opinion

[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago

I was one of the former. Photography isn't my job, but it's really important to me, and photo editing was a show stopper for me for a long time. Even after I moved to Linux full time, I was using remote desktops, VMs and whatever else I could manage to get Adobe stuff working, without having to switch back to Windows. I endured, because I'd finally hit a threshold where that pain was worth putting up with in preference to Windows and its built in ads and spyware.

But when I finally gave up on getting Lightroom working on linux, I figured I had no choice but to learn a linux compatible workflow... It was either that, or go back to windows, and that wasn't happening...

[-] fascicle@leminal.space 10 points 1 day ago

That was exaclty me like three years ago now. I stopped editing photos for like a year because I got so fed up with windows and did the switch cold turkey. No idea why it took me so long to just watch a few workflow videos on darktable but I use it constantly now I feel like I could do better but I'm comfortable

[-] IMALlama@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

I found darktable pretty user friendly TBH. The thing I've been struggling with is image editing - I can't find something that has a decent workflow. I'm not looking for anything fancy. Paint.net on windows more than met my needs when I was spending more time in windows.

[-] nautevenkidding@feddit.org 3 points 13 hours ago

For me it was the same back some years ago - paint.net was the software I probably missed the most. Between Pinta and Krita, I tend to find everything I need. Pinta is most similar to paint.net imo, quite a bit more basic, but the same toolkit and design philosophy I'd say.

[-] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Thanks a lot for the suggestions, I'll have to check Pinta out.

[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 16 hours ago

My biggest issue with darktable was the masking. It's so different in darktable, but once I understood it, all the barriers fell away

I can't find something that has a decent workflow. I'm not looking for anything fancy

I import, sort and tag my photos with Digikam, and then open them with darktable for editing.

[-] koldanor@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Any reason why you are using digikam for importing and sorting and not just daktable?

[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 13 hours ago

Digikam is built from the ground up to be a photo cataloger. Hierarchical tags that you can click on to expand or contract, the ability to jump from a given photo to all photos taken on the same date, or all photos in the same folder, or all photos that share a particular tag. Collapsible folders and tag structures, the ability to toggle child tag/folder recursive view on or off, image grouping (automated by filename/timestamp/burst). They also share metadata perfectly well through EXIF data, so anything I do in one is visible in the other right away.

This is digikam

This is the same folder in darktable

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

I find the catalogue more convenient in digikam, but it might be because I've used it since the beginning.

[-] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Sorry, I meant a decent editing workflow. Things along the lines of editing - adding outlined text, moving and/or removing things, etc. For example, I've tried gimp a few times but I've found myself fighting against the way it wants you to do things.

[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

Ah, no, I use darktable for all of my editing. But sorting my photos, rating, tagging and flagging them for future editing is all digikam.

[-] KryptonNerd@slrpnk.net 3 points 15 hours ago

Would Pixi editor be the kind of thing you're looking for?

[-] IMALlama@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

I will give it a try, thanks for the suggestion.

[-] st3ph3n@midwest.social 8 points 1 day ago

Lightroom for me, although it is more than just the installer that breaks it.

[-] 474D@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

This should be applicable to "alternatively sourced" PS installs too then?

[-] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

alternatively sourced

I think old versions pre-adobe cloud have been working pretty well for a long time, IIRC. It's really the latest versions that most companies force employees to use that are messed up.

But Adobe cloud is, like, 12 years old now IIRC so you'd have to be using a pretty old version.

[-] higgsboson@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago

CS 6 still works just fine

[-] AnimusExMachina@programming.dev 3 points 23 hours ago

Still haven't gotten After Effects working in wine. Everything else that I use from my master collection works well though.

[-] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Their dumb installer is a web app incorrectly displayed under wine. If you install an Adobe program in a virtual machine then copy its files not every program works. Like Premiere doesn't work but Photoshop and Audition seems to work.

[-] homes@piefed.world 16 points 1 day ago

no fucking way

[-] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 13 points 1 day ago

It could take a while to get into Wine. The test suite is pretty extensive and automated but patches can break things as well as new tests may need to be developed to ensure that testing is accurate.

[-] priapus@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago

Yeah, there isnt even a merge request upstream yet and it seems like no tests have been added, which I'm sure will be required before merge.

They did release a binary of their fork, and you can always build it yourself as well.

this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
240 points (98.8% liked)

Linux

11157 readers
838 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS