18
I can’t wait for all the leftists here to tell me exactly why AOC is too far right for anyone to vote for.
She doesn't agree with me on everything up to and including mustard preference, so she's not capable of doing anything good ever. That's also why Vance isn't too far right to vote for btw. I won't elaborate.
Also she hasn't singlehandedly brought peace to insert random conflict in the world somewhere therefore she's just as bad if not worse than the Republicans, therefore I will not vote for her.
Also I will immediately forget about said conflict the minute the elections are over and I'm definitely not a Russian shill.
I'm definitely not a Russian shill.
These circlejerks are really start to sound like one. Good job, comrade. Fuck Putin.
"Let's do nothing about a genocide we're actively supporting because we're fine with as many people dying with our military complex. But it shouldn't inconvenience me, that's where my responsibility ends."
And when people say you deserve trump you can't help yourself call them names and use ad hominem to deflect off any criticism.
It's grainy Dijon mustard, right?
Ain't that the truth. Just had an argument the other with someone who said that unless she was left of Bernie there was no point in voting for her, and I'm like don't let perfect be the enemy of good, and my god you think I told them their mother was a whore. Finally realized what they were though and stopped responding then blocked.
She’s in New York and if you look at the USA then you’ll notice that it is the biggest city on the RIGHT of the USA.
Check. MATE.
leftist here.
She has my vote
She should just take schumers senate seat. Its more valuable to have another leftist vote in the senate chamber than it is to have one in the hot seat.
Fearmongering and badmouthing have made Ocasio-Cortez a bit of a... Let's just say, there are a lot of Democrats who won't vote for her.
I would. Absolutely. But we need a safe bet, one that will appeal to everyone who ain't a fucking MAGAt moron.
Don't run another woman please. Have they really not learned their lesson? I hate that it's true, but the US is a misogynistic population.
Hillary won the popular vote in 2016.
Did it matter?
"women can't win elections"
"a woman technically won the election in 2016"
"did it matter?"
The problem is not the vulva, the problem is running fuckers who dont CHANGE ANYTHING. Dems uphold the status quo, and Americans VERY CLEARLY do not want that. They want radical change, doesnt matter if it's left or right leaning.
Hillary and Kamala's public perception were in large part "The predecessor v2" and not "Big change for the US". Hillary is the wife of a dem president of the 90s. Kamala was literally Joe's VP, and Joe was Obamas VP. Joe only won due to the aftermath of COVID-19 and Americans having short term memory loss forgot that Trump was in office for COVID, and voted him back in because he was promising change.
The problem is the marketing and the fact dems aren't fucking doing enough. Run AOC.
Oh I completely agree. Kamala was always Hillary 2.0. But still, the risk, even is it's a few percent, is not worth it.
With the insane temperature of US politics these days, I almost don't want her to run...
This is all performative. I think AOC has already been promised Chuck's seat without a primary challenger in 2028, and she's gonna take it.
She knows that if she ran for President in 2028, she would't stand a chance, because she lacks a key thing that Gavin has -- a penis. Look at the last few elections, and you will see that whenever the Democrats ran someone with that key asset for President, they won! The last penis-haver who lost was John Kerry, and he had his own issues.
No, all of America isn't a misogynist hellhole. But there are enough people out there who will come up with any excuse to not vote for a woman to make a difference. (My favorite from the last election was the guy who didn't vote for Harris because she reminded him too much of his ex-wife.)
AOC will run for Senate and win, and serve there for a term or three. Maybe by then, we'll be ready for a female President.
Would love to see the dems have the guts to put her in the VP position at some point.
Sure, but she appears to be an effective enough politician that making her VP is a bit of a waste. All the VP does is settle fights in the Senate and wait for the President to die.
Americans are currently still too misogynist to elect a female president. I’m sure she would do a great job, but it’s safer to slot her into the VP slot for now.
Safest to have her take Chuck's Senate seat. But I am acting a bit selfish here: as a New York State resident, I don't want to give her up yet.
Doesn't matter if she's ready, doesn't matter if she even wants to be president
The next presidential is a "stars align" election and we can be deep in some FDR level shit in a decade because of it
It doesn't need to be AOC, but it'll be easier for her than anyone else
And maga won't say anything about her they didn't say about Hillary, Biden, or Harris. So it doesn't matter what they'd say, and Obama showed us we don't need neoliberals to win elections if we have a candidate with any measurable charisma.
So the only "downside" would be the neoliberals becoming Republicans again, which would start moderating that side of the aisle again.
doesn’t matter if she even wants to be president
Yeah, if she's going to be the nominee, that probably matters.
You don't know what "neoliberal" means and your "both sides" bullshit has brought about two Trump presidencies.
Obama the "neoliberal" won only on charisma and not policy? Utter bullshit.
You guys will stop at nothing to keep Republicans in power. You don't care about progressive issues.
You don’t know what “neoliberal” means and your “both sides” bullshit has brought about two Trump presidencies.
Oh yeah totally...
The reason trump got elected twice wasn't we kept running people with zero charisma and policy significantly to the right of the Dem voter base...
It's because some people online had the outright gall to talk about it, if they'd have just maintained the lie, maybe enough people would have fell for the lies!
/S
this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
18 points (95.0% liked)
politics
27829 readers
959 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS