109

Chinese technology companies are paving the way for a world that will be powered by electric motors rather than gas-guzzling engines. It is a decisively 21st-century approach not just to solve its own energy problems, but also to sell batteries and other electric products to everyone else. Canada is its newest buyer of EVs; in a rebuke of Mr. Trump, its prime minister, Mark Carney, lowered tariffs on the cars as part of a new trade deal.

Though Americans have been slow to embrace electric vehicles, Chinese households have learned to love them. In 2025, 54 percent of new cars sold in China were either battery-powered or plug-in hybrids. That is a big reason that the country’s oil consumption is on track to peak in 2027, according to forecasts from the International Energy Agency. And Chinese E.V makers are setting records — whether it’s BYD’s sales (besting Tesla by battery-powered vehicles sold for the first time last year) or Xiaomi’s speed (its cars are setting records at major racetracks like Nürburgring in Germany).

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] melfie@lemy.lol 18 points 1 week ago

I’d sooner buy a Chinese EV than a Tesla, but the orange gameshow host running my country says I can’t.

[-] mirshafie@europe.pub 3 points 1 week ago

I want a fucking Huawei P70. The 10x camera on that thing can practically take stabilized macro photos from a 5 m distance. But Ursula says Orange Man will spank her if she allows competition to Apple and Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

I can hold out on not buying a new car a hell of a lot longer than the American economy can survive under a tariff regime.

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Because Biden said you could? He's the one that doubled tariffs on Chinese EVs from 50% to 100%. Biden also gave the EV tax credit which was essentially a subsidy to Tesla, which Trump ended.

Note that I'm not defending Trump, but simply noting that the US was heading in his direction. He's a symptom of advanced disease, but you don't get to blame him all the shitty things all US presidents ever did. He's a raging tumor, but the cancer was spreading already.

[-] mirshafie@europe.pub 4 points 1 week ago

You're absolutely right. Trump is a lightning rod for rage, but most of what the US is doing is bipartisan. It's a huge problem that so many people harbor false hope for the controlled opposition.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

That is a very fair statement.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

It's like he wakes up every morning and asks himself "What can I do to make sure China owns the 21st century?"

[-] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 15 points 1 week ago

Thats because he's stuck in the 80s. It's common for people with dementia to fall back to a time they thought was good and for him, it was the 80s when oil was king.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Frankly you're giving him too much credit. If oil is really still king it won't need his help. He might be able to claim he was just being fair if he had only removed subsidies, but he was and still is actively sabotaging adoption of electric vehicles, like by terminating the USPS contract to buy all those electric mail trucks or removing already installed EV chargers at federal sites.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

This is one of those situations where the venn diagram of Trump's handlers becomes a circle.

You have the billionaire Oil executives that want to continue using all their existing infrastructure and wasy access to continue printing money like they do now. Meanwhile, those companies all see the writing on the wall and know it's running out so they're investing in or buying technologies and companies working on alternatives. They're playing both sides because they're not idiots.

And then you have the manipulators like Putin (who we know Trump idolizes) with their goals of destroying American power across the board. Having America not only abandon new technologies but even propping up the old ones past when they should be phased out to focus on century-old priorities while the rest of the world continues to move on, helps that overall goal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 10 points 1 week ago

Coal Brittain -> Petro Murica -> Electro China.

It's funny how China said years ago that was the plan and they're doing it while nobody stopped them because of short term greed.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

nobody stopped them

What would "stopping them" have even looked like?

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Competing. No one really even tried.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Facing reality and evaluating technologies through the crucial era of the 2010s with an eye on efficiency and pollutant reduction in the overall energy sector. From there, having the empirical justifications to your nation that focusing on energy storage and further electrification would be more beneficial than fossil fuels.

Rather than doubling down on the existing status quo due to lobbying and sunk cost beliefs from prior consumption rates.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] fennesz12@feddit.dk 7 points 1 week ago

Our Danish company Ørsted which produces wind power, has been in a huge legal dispute with the American administration for months over this. He wants oil, even if wind is cheaper:

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/02/rsted-files-legal-challenge-against-us-government-over-windfarm-lease-freeze

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

He wants oil even if the wind is cheaper, the wind farm is almost finished and already producing power

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah because it's not so much "he wants" as "oil and gas corporations are paying him for".

[-] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago
[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, conservatives don't think of the future except through the lens of the present. They can't imagine a world with EVs and batteries because they have oil brains. They are looking for solutions to problems with an oil first mindset. Sunk cost is everything.

[-] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Need to remember where they are getting paid from as well. That’s oil money lining their pockets.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Yes, China has very purposefully put itself at the forefront of the first technological revolution of the 21st century and done this at multiple levels (solar panel production, battery tech, EVs)

Meanwhile the American elites have decided that 19th century technology is were they want to be. Well, that and dead ending killing the country's lead in the Tech revolution by going down a branch with no future in the form of LLMs and making everybody lose trust in keeping their data in anything owned by American companies.

And, of course, the crooked politicians here in Europe are actually following America more than China in this.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

And, of course, the crooked politicians here in Europe are actually following America more than China in this.

That is much less the case then it might appear. Out of the Top10 largest EV makers three are European(Volkswagen, BMW and Stellantis). When you look at wind, Europe has a few of the largest companies in the world. Europe is also basically the only place even attempting to compete with China in batteries, since Trump cut US support for that industry. There are plenty of more niche industries as well, in which Europe has some very strong companies.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Beyond EVs, the much cheaper sodium-ion battery is entering mass production in China. We can already buy B-grade cells on AliExpress. This will have implications for all sorts of use cases that could use batteries but don't due to cost.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Oil is the longest word he can spell without spellcheck.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

He managed to spell enigma pretty well.

[-] chemicalprophet@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

Those Chinese seem to be some decent forward thinking blokes. Nothing like I was led to believe by west

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

One is an energy and material source. The other is neither and is simply storage.

Why would you compare them?

I wonder if the prediction that China will hit peak oil in 2027 will come true. This will have a massive impact on oil markets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

they are shutting down refineries all over the country because people aren't buying as much gas as they used to

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

I saw an IEA (i think it was ) estimate that China reduced oil consumption by 1.6 million barrels a day already becase of their EV rollout (cars and buses).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
109 points (93.6% liked)

Technology

79969 readers
320 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS