78

Since the indictment, four of the 19 co-defendants have taken plea deals with prosecutors. Scott Hall, a former bail bondsman, was the first to do so last month.

In recent days, three Trump attorneys have now followed suit and agreed to testify against the former president. Sidney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro took plea deals late last week, and Ellis joined them Tuesday.

Legal experts suggest their agreements to testify could raise the other defendants’ legal jeopardy or also induce them to take a deal.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

Georgia prosecutors wiped that smile right off her face.

[-] pbjamm@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I wish. If I conspired overthrow an election and my punishment was a $5k fine and fake apology I would be grinning too.

High reward, low risk. This will keep happening.

[-] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Well she was crying in court anyway. Even if they were crocodile tears. Her career is probably over though so who knows.

[-] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Another loyal American subverted by the Deep State! /s

[-] memfree@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

Rather than taking the blame, she said (in part):

What I did not do, but should have done, your honor, is to make sure that the facts that the other lawyers alleged to be true were, in fact, true. In the frenetic pace of attempting to raise challenges to the election in several states, including Georgia, I failed to do my due diligence.

[-] comedy@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

The Model Rules explicitly disallow the type of defense she’s posing, I.e. “my boss told me it was OK!” She knows this, so she’s attempting to shift to a defense of innocent negligence (lack of diligence), rather than willful violations of law and ethics rules. Which, given she’s just agreed to be convicted of a crime or crimes, is going to be a tough defense to put up.

I believe Colorado will start separate bar/ethics proceedings now that’s she’s been newly convicted of a crime. She was not convicted when the CO Bar originally censured her, though the subject of the censure is largely the same.

TL;DR: She’s chock full of shit and hopes the CO Bar is going to punish her for a lack of diligence (which might be a lesser punishment) than for intentionally attempting to subvert an election.

Source: I’m a lawyer barred in two states. Kill me.
Disclaimer: take whatever I say with a massive grain of salt, I’m not your lawyer, I’m not barred in Colorado, etc.

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
78 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10188 readers
675 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS