93
submitted 2 days ago by glitching@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

okay, first off: hey, what the fuck?

mozilla has a A THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED MILLIONS of dollars? what were all them cookie sales for thunderbird? oh yeah, they have this shell game of interlinked but not really entities so you can play whack-a-mole till the death of the universe.

and they wanna burn it dicking around with AI? fuck each and every ghoul steering that ship into the abyss, and they can take Gnome's fucking shaman or whatwasit with them.

is everybody insane, "silicon valley" was supposed to be a satire, these cretins make mike judge seem like a prophet...

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Congrats Disney, you did it.

You have obliterated the original message of Star Wars.

[-] DocumentingDecline@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

The big companies are burning down the planet building datacenters to run pointless AI so we're going to combat that by... building datacenters to run AI?

If they actually wanted to rebel against it they would build low energy tools to detect and remove AI spam and encourage people not to engage with this shit at all.

The truly rebellious action would be to make it so you can turn that bullshit off.

[-] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 65 points 2 days ago
[-] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 days ago
[-] anytime2962@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

You should have destroyed the Fascist AI companies, not join them!

[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 32 points 2 days ago

I love star wars but fuck I hate it too so much.

an AI ‘rebel alliance’

Criiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinge

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

AI rebel alliance is something that should have happen in Star Wars but didn't on any meaningful scale. Free the droids!

[-] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

!waterfox@programming.dev seriously, jump ship to a fork that's not actively trying to kick itself in the nuts as hard as feasibly possible

[-] scala@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Waterfox + Linux + GrapheneOS ftw

[-] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Not looked at Graphene, will have to check it out

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 days ago

This sounds like a distraction from making Firefox good. 

[-] utopiah@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

How I interpret this :

  • Oh no, the very trend and thus powerful corporations are doing something stupid that does not work, let's copy them!

instead of just watch the sideline as they keep on pouring more resources with nothing to show for it except the buzz they keep so hard on trying to maintain.

[-] limer@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago

Might be imagining it, but I think there is enough proof somewhere that some Mozilla board members were paid or extorted by google to sabotage the organization

[-] brianpeiris@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

You really don't need to reach for conspiracy when the entirety of silicon valley has gone AI crazy.

[-] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

I think they're talking about how Mozilla has consistently made bad decisions for years at this point. Not necessarily because of Google though, they probably just don't care.

[-] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago

I wouldn't be against it but... You don't need to support companies or nonprofits, we already got DeepSeek and Qwen which are open source, they don't need money, but they're also not going to go that way because they're Chinese. So they basically want some Western alternative, sure, whatever.

[-] BB84@mander.xyz 0 points 1 day ago

AllenAI exists and is actually open source rather than just open weight.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago

Cope slop for those still on firefox. I finally got around to downloading waterfox and it runs great.

[-] kurcatovium@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago

A lot of people don't understand the fact that without Firefox there won't be any Waterfox, Librewolf, Ironfox, Fennec, etc. So despite Mozilla doing some really, really stupid shit we should all keep our fingers crossed the browser somehow manage to survive their leadership.

[-] tomenzgg@midwest.social 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah? Would you say everything's pretty fluid?

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

…I actually wouldn’t be against this.

But it isn’t even genuine. They’ve forked llama.cpp into a broken clone like about 500 other corporations, instead of just contributing to shit that actually works and is used, and… that’s about it.

That's about par for the AI industry.

[-] BennyTheExplorer@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Servo and Ladybird can't come fast enough man. I hope, that they are mature before Mozilla inevitabley crashes into the fucking ground.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago
[-] doleo@lemmy.one 5 points 2 days ago

and still no gecko firefox for ios.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 days ago

I mean that's moreso on Apple than it is on Mozilla. They force the use of Webkit.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 4 points 2 days ago

Weren't they forced by the EU to allow non-Webkit browsers?

Although by now it's probably to late. Making a app on another engine is basically a totally new project.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

IIRC, Apple's "open" browser implementation was so fundamentally broken and difficult that it made the actual implementation of a third-party browser exceedingly difficult. Kinda like how their call-blocking API is nothing more than a database loader with no feedback, so call blocking apps can't share data back to improve through crowd-sourcing. The products all have to learn from Android phones on the same product to be able to share with iPhones.

The EU is not a big enough market to justify a whole new, free iOS browser with a different engine that doesn’t work elsewhere. Which is why this EU policy was effectively useless.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think it's rather that they're still forced to use Webkit everywhere but the EU and financially it probably doesn't make sense to port Gecko to iOS when worldwide iOS has pretty small marketshare. iOS only holds over 50% marketshare in USA, Canada, Australia, Japan, Norway, Sweden, and Iceland. In most EU countries it's under 30% marketshare. Android literally dominates in all of Mexico, South America, Africa, and Asia, in other words, far too many countries to list, most of which iOS has less than 10% marketshare.

Why would you go through so much trouble for arguably such a small slice of the world's iOS market when the majority of the iOS market will still be forced to use Webkit?

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

Don’t worry! They can just vibe code it now!

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago
[-] BennyTheExplorer@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I actually think servo has a much better chance of making it, because it is better managed, supported by the Linux Foundation and their lead devs don't give weird right-wing vibes like "Andreas Kling".

this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
93 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

41251 readers
137 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS