23
submitted 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) by polotype@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Hi

I would like to understand electromagnetic based mass drivers and any kind of electromagnetic balistic system.

If any of yall have some nice sources or would be willing to spend some time introducing me to the subject, i''d be more than happy.

(And if you know someone who isn't a lemming but who might be able to answer my questions, please forward my request ;) )

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] leftascenter@jlai.lu 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)
[-] polotype@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

Thanks, i actually looked at this one during preliminary research and felt it was a bit shallow on details. I might give it a more thorought read if you suggest it and i should really look up their sources which may be a tad more advanced

@_@

[-] leftascenter@jlai.lu 1 points 6 hours ago

The doc is thin. It's really the references that need a second look

Are you trying to build one, interested in the specifics of the electromagnetics, or just looking for a general overview?

Lots of difference between a wiki level overview, the physics involved, or the engineering behind making a theoretical item function in reality.

[-] polotype@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 hours ago

I'm looking for the former two with scientifical understanding taking precedence.

End goal being to build a scaled down version as a uni project.

So I can't help with exact physics too much or exact electrical. Just a manufacturing engineer with too many hobbies.

At a basic level, you'll want to decide what you're making. While similar, the specifics will decide what you need exactly. A coilgun or mass driver uses electromagnetic coils in a series, 1 -> 2 -> 3 ect. Each coil is powered one after the other, with sufficient uptime and delay before the next to pull a ferrous carrier or projectile forward. Moments before it reaches the powered coil, that coil should shut down, moving the field further and continuing the acceleration. Note, as you accelerate the payload you will see a shorter uptime and delay at subsequent coils.

Of note: How you're moving the payload is important. If you're using a carrier, you will need to either account for its separation from the payload (consider a sabot in a shotgun shell, though many other designs likely exist) or its deceleration before the end of the line to avoid its self destructive impact. A carrier less payload needs some means of moving along with minimal friction, and must be ferrous so that the induced fields will interact with it. Most I've seen made used a non conductive tube polished smooth inside with each coil wound around the tube itself. Electronics on the outside, launching a steel ball bearing. Easily procured capacitors from cameras set up to each coil and confirmed to pop off in series. Either a LONG tube, or potentially hazardous electrical charges. Please consult a real electrician or engineer before using higher power inputs.

It's certainly been done quite often, but doing anything particularly impressive will be a bit of a feat without significant input.

A rail gun is actually far easier to make, if even less impressive without massive power inputs (potentially millions of amps to achieve the theoretical velocities a railgun is associated with) and precision manufacturing. Instead of creating a coil, a neat bit of physics is abused. Functionally, your design will resemble an elongated H, with the bottom legs extending as long as you'd like. Power source wires to the tops of each leg. The center portion serves to bridge the rails and complete the circuit and will also need to move up and down them freely. What this creates is a magnetic field between the center bridge and the power inputs on top. This field will propel the center down the rails. Every bit of rail behind the connection will generate a magnetic field as it does so. No need to time coils.

Sled is a must, as the center must contact the rails the whole time. The more magnetically reactive you can get the sled/payload, the easier acceleration becomes. Adding magnets to the sled isn't uncommon.

As with the coil gun, getting anything impressive becomes quite a feat. A demonstration of what's happening is fairly easy.

We've done childrens demonstrations as part of the company outreach like this. A magnet and paperclips will suffice. I would suggest a railgun and you start there, as the demonstration is easily found online and scale up from there. Uni project, not Naval bombardment being your goal.

I cannot stress enough. Please consult with someone knowledgeable in electronics if you start moving into higher power inputs. A demo model mishap with 9V is a tingle. Running 120V gets serious very quickly.

[-] polotype@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago

Thanks for the very informative answer !

As it's a 1.5 year long project, i might be leaning more towards a coil gun as there is more "research" (won't be discovering anything new but yk what i mean) to be done.

As for your security concerns, don't worry, it'll be vetoed by teachers and laboratory technicians. And every experiment will be planned and executed in controlled condition. Plus i doubt we'll have access to any tremendous power ;)

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

The two theoric basis for that are the Maxwell equations and the electromagnetic force equation. It should not be overly difficult to process that. But after that, it's engineering, and there there are many, many moving parts.

[-] polotype@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

Oki, thx for the pointer ;)

[-] _deleted_@aussie.zone 3 points 10 hours ago

there are a few articles on hackaday. that’s all I’ve got

[-] polotype@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 hours ago

It ain't much but it's honest contrivbution, thx

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
23 points (96.0% liked)

Asklemmy

52537 readers
709 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS