104

The FBI has been unable to access a Washington Post reporter’s seized iPhone because it was in Lockdown Mode, a sometimes overlooked feature that makes iPhones broadly more secure, according to recently filed court records.

The court record shows what devices and data the FBI was able to ultimately access, and which devices it could not, after raiding the home of the reporter, Hannah Natanson, in January as part of an investigation into leaks of classified information. It also provides rare insight into the apparent effectiveness of Lockdown Mode, or at least how effective it might be before the FBI may try other techniques to access the device.

“Because the iPhone was in Lockdown mode, CART could not extract that device,” the court record reads, referring to the FBI’s Computer Analysis Response Team, a unit focused on performing forensic analyses of seized devices. The document is written by the government, and is opposing the return of Natanson’s devices.

Archive: http://archive.today/gfTg9

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

This news sparks joy. It’s a shame the FBI is wasting their time on petty political bullshit like this instead of going after real crime. What a shameful chapter for the FBI, and that’s really saying something given their illustrious history.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago

You act like there's a cabal of kid rapist running the world.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sundray@lemmus.org 10 points 1 week ago

If they had any decency at all they should be arresting the president.

But hell would need to freeze over first. 😡

[-] unphazed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

They did that, twice. Even got a trial and 34 felonies. Repercussions? None. Honestly if you do your job and not only see nothing come of it but said felon has an impact on your job now I can sympathize a bit.

[-] deHaga@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

He would have been fucked if he had lost the election, and money won the election, money and the markets is the only thing Trump cares about.

Scott Galloway has the right idea

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/02/business/video/national-protests-immigration-trump-administration-lead-jake-tapper

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Right!?

Like ohhh. So important to see if someone liked a post. Meanwhile tech espionage and terrorists take over the world.

How dare we 'radicalize' over the idea of free Healthcare.

Absolute sham of 'protection'.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Best advertisement I've heard for an iPhone ever. Now that Android moving to the same walled garden business model...

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago

GrapheneOS is ~10x more private and secure than iOS.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I want a phone, not a hobby.

[-] StitchInTime@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

Well well well, look who likes using banking apps and tap-to-pay.

[-] Attacker94@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Discounting some minor comparability issues, the process just requires a computer, an internet connection, a cable, and the ability to read through a couple paragraphs of instruction.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm talking about daily use. I have a good friend, we've both been computer nerds since The Apple II era, we both used to put custom roms on our android phones, we're avid self hosters, etc... He recently switched to Graphene and wants to switch back to something that's less of a pain. His complaints are pretty much the same as reasons I haven't switched. I warned him it would be an adjustment.

[-] napoleonsdumbcousin@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

As someone who uses GrapheneOS with sandboxed GooglePlay on his only smartphone (with daily usage for years at this point): I don't know what kind of adjustment you are referring to. I never had to adjust to anything, because I never encountered anything that GrapheneOS couldn't do that stock Android could. Follow the installation process and after that the phone behaves like a regular phone, except you have way more options regarding security and privacy.

Is your friend trying to use GrapheneOS without any Google services maybe?

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I had to fiddle with some stuff to get the Google location history and Android Auto working. But if you're using it for privacy-from-Google purposes you probably don't care about those.

Edit: also RCS and tap to pay with credit/debit card. Those require your carrier and Google to allow them, respectively.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] itsworkthatwedo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

So you haven't used it yourself and are shitting on an OS based on anecdotal evidence? "Stop making stupid assumptions”, I once heard someone say.

I use GrapheneOS and have helped other less tech-savvy people install and use it. You can just roll with the defaults and have a better privacy stance than the spyware Google puts out, or you can take a deep dive. It works just fine either way.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm an experienced technologist (a software engineer for over 30 years), I used to regularly install CyanogenMod on my phones. While I didn't find the graphene OS installation to be particularly difficult, I did find actually using it to be too much of a challenge to live with every day. The biggest single problem I can recall is that I could not do any group ~~SMS~~ MMS texts. Many searches and attempts at fixes later, I realized that it was a known bug that for reasons unknown did not seem to affect all users. There were a number of minor annoyances in addition to that bug.

That may reflect more on how Google has locked down things on the pixel phones, or other stuff they've done to keep things as proprietary as possible in their software and devices. I switched back because it wasn't worth the hassle to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Up voting because you made be lol, not because I agree with you. Been on GOS for over a year, it's not that bad. A few apps don't work, it's only slightly inconvenient.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's not a hobby.

Don't confuse Graphene with a tinker box, or some ROM you once rooted.

It's a professionally polished and very secure fork of Android.

There are some minor limitations with a handful apps that can't pass their Google specific internal security checks, but there's lists of them that you can check to see if any are a deal breaker for you.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Sigh, how, just how do you quantify that?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Android phones have lockdown mode too. Hold the power button to show the shutdown menu and click lockdown.

phone screenshot

[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

They're not the same. Android lockdown is a temporary lock screen state. iOS lockdown is a full OS hardening, affects the way the phone operates full-time.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] lautan@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

The FBI just wants the public to think their phone is secure. I got news for you, it's not secure. Look up Snowden.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Reminder that none of your data is safe on a cloud. Law enforcement can get a judge to sign off and make Google/Apple decrypt your cloud data and give it to them.

If you really want your data private you have to put it on an encrypted hard drive. Recommend Veracrypt.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

One shortcoming of lockdown mode, as far as I can tell: you can pair your phone and watch so locking your phone will lock your watch as well, but you can’t do the reverse. It seems more likely that a hostile party would get access to your phone first while you still (temporarily) have control of your watch, so being able to lock your phone from your watch would be extremely useful. (Or for that matter, set lockdown mode to trigger automatically if your watch is removed or your watch and phone move to different locations.)

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] bokherif@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

This is just an advertisement. There is no phone the government cannot get into if they wanted.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Dunno what this has to do with the Ginza Apple Store. The intern just used the first stock photo they could find, I guess.

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

It's sad how the internet has somehow made the quality of ostensibly professional journalism so much worse. It was supposed to make things better.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Here are the instructions to enable and description of how it works. Seems really complete.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/105120

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
104 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

81114 readers
694 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS