12
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I'm building OpenWatch, an open-source self-hosted video platform as an alternative to YouTube. It's designed for content creators who want to back up their content on their own infrastructure (in case of strikes) or for anyone who wants a personal video hosting solution.

The project is in early stages, but I've built out some core features:

  • Home feed
  • Video player with adaptive streaming
  • Playlists
  • Interactions (likes, comments, subscriptions)
  • Creator Studio (dashboard, content management, channel customization)

Tech stack: 

  • Next.js 16
  • Tailwind CSS v4
  • Drizzle ORM (PostgreSQL)
  • FFmpeg
  • HLS.js
  • Zustand
  • Docker

GitHub: https://github.com/openwatch-app/openwatch

Feedback would be helpful, especially around self-hosting considerations and features you'd find useful.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 5PACEBAR@piefed.ca 6 points 2 months ago
[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

Doesn't matter there we'll never be a replacement for YouTube the cost is to great. Think of the storage they barely remove videos they just stay up there.

[-] boogiebored@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Decentralized video streaming? Like torrenting but encrypted traffic from disparate nodes like Storj? Not that tech, but something in that vein.

Also how Tor works but that would be slow af.

🤔💭

[-] Liketearsinrain@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

That's how peertube works for streaming (not storage), with P2P

[-] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 0 points 2 months ago

Doesn’t matter there we’ll never be a replacement for YouTube the cost is to great. Think of the storage they barely remove videos they just stay up there.

I never said it's a YouTube replacement :)

[-] fum@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Why would anyone use this non FOSS vibe coded thing instead of PeerTube? Copying YouTube's UX is not a good enough reason when better FOSS alternatives already exist.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Wdym non FOSS? It's MIT. That's still FOSS even if it's not the flavor of FOSS you prefer

[-] fum@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

They changed the licence to MIT after my post. So good on them. The original licence was non FOSS. You can see it in the git history if you're interested.

[-] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club -1 points 2 months ago

Why would anyone use this non FOSS vibe coded thing instead of PeerTube? Copying YouTube’s UX is not a good enough reason when better FOSS alternatives already exist.

It's an open source world bro, you can choose what you want, chill :))

[-] mike_wooskey@lemmy.thewooskeys.com -1 points 2 months ago

I don't care if AI was used in its creation. I do care if it's FOSS/libre.

And also, it's a bit weird to me that copying YouTube's UI is considered good. I havent used YouTube in a long time, but I recall there being some good aspects and some bad. Why not create your own vesion of a UI?

[-] WarnikOdinson@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

Makes it easier for people to move over, and more willing to.

[-] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago

And also, it’s a bit weird to me that copying YouTube’s UI is considered good. I havent used YouTube in a long time, but I recall there being some good aspects and some bad. Why not create your own vesion of a UI?

I completely understand your point of view. But I want to make something that's easier for YouTube users to migrate to.

[-] squirrel@piefed.kobel.fyi 6 points 2 months ago

put ActivityPub in it :)

But seriously, a PeerTube compatible software with a different approach than PeerTube could be good for the federated video ecosystem.

[-] hornedfiend@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

For sure, an ActivityPub video platform that is not TikTok like (i.e Loops) would be amazing.

[-] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago

Thanks for the feedback :)

[-] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

While many in fedi will say the above, a simple federated search model could increase adoption. I.E. don't bother going crazy with it, just add a discovery platform where you can search "your own" or "the network".

[-] bisserkr@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

That repo looks like someone vibe coded a YouTube clone

[-] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I use AI but not entirely. Thanks for the feedback though, I'll try to improve

[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago

Thank you for the warning.

[-] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 months ago

So what is the difference between this and PeerTube?

[-] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 months ago

Hey, thanks for the question. I want to build an experience much more similar to YouTube, with a more similar design and flow.

[-] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago

Do you think you could work towards ActivityPub integration so it would be able to talk to PeerTube instances? IMO diversity is strength but cooperation is a factor in success. Hope this project goes well and is fun 😁

[-] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago

Do you think you could work towards ActivityPub integration so it would be able to talk to PeerTube instances? IMO diversity is strength but cooperation is a factor in success. Hope this project goes well and is fun 😁

Sure, I'll add that to the list. Thanks for the feedback :)

[-] mesamunefire@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

It would be a killer feature for us in the fedi. :)

Peertube is awesome, but more alternatives in the space would be welcome.

[-] jlow@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

How is the design and flow of Peertube different from YT, can you give e few examples? For me they are super similar (there's a video feed, I click on one, I get a page with videos that has comments and related videos).

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Okay, why this over peertube?

[-] mike_wooskey@lemmy.thewooskeys.com 2 points 2 months ago

I agree that more options is a good thing, and that activitypub would be a plus. But FYI, I wont be using it because of the license. I use only FOSS whenevr possible.

[-] klangcola@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago

Good catch, that licence does not look very Libre =\

[-] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Good catch, that licence does not look very Libre =\

Thanks for the feedback, it was already changed it

[-] ozoned@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago

Absolute best of luck to you! :) We need more diversity in software!

I hope AcitivityPub or some federation mechanism is being supported. :)

If you ever want to come on a podcast, Fireside Fedi, let me know. :)

Also if/when you're ever needing someone to test the software I'm starting another show called Works On My Machine Live where I install the software and talk to the dev during it.

[-] Liketearsinrain@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Not federated, seemingly vibecoded, MIT. Peertube exists, not sure this makes a ton of sense as an alternative but good luck otherwise.

[-] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club -5 points 2 months ago

Get a life bro

[-] thoralf@discuss.familie-will.at 1 points 2 months ago

An alternative approach to PeerTube would be very welcome. ActivityPub-integration is a must for me, though.

[-] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 0 points 2 months ago

Update 02/07:

  • Changed license to MIT
  • Made first steps for implementing Federation, now you can search and view videos and channels from other platforms, more features in this direction coming in the future

Thank you for all the feedback received!

[-] zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Mit license allows the use for commercial purposes without funding, which if it becomes popular and adopted you would have to support it without any kick backs. Please look into GPLv3

[-] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago

Thanks for the feedback

this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
12 points (80.0% liked)

Selfhosted

58268 readers
181 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS