22
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The REASON it's illegal and dangerous to walk from these hotels is there's a damn whole canal between here and the stadium and the bridge is a limited-access highway. https://maps.app.goo.gl/5nK4bkNg9fHkWunn7

There isn't a pedestrian bridge over the canal, that's why you gotta get a ride.

[-] susi7802@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

Sounds like bad planning.

[-] mcv@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

So, why is there no pedestrian bridge?

[-] knightly@pawb.social 7 points 1 month ago

Holy Shit, making it from the nearest hotel across the canal turns a 1-mile walk into a 6-mile hike =U

That has to be deliberate, there's no other excuse for it.

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Deliberate in the sense that someone built a hotel on land that was cheap for reason?

Do you think that the city should engage a billion dollar civil engineering project to build a pedestrian bridge over a navigable canal so that it can serve whoever was dumb enough to build a hotel here?

To be clear, there are like a hundred hotels that you CAN walk to this stadium from, just not this one.

[-] mcv@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

A billion dollars for a pedestrian bridge? That thing had better be made of gold, then.

[-] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

found some figures about cost of bridge building and apparently if one were to construct a completely new pedestrian overpass/bridge over that canal would be on the ballpark of about 2-10 million dollars

[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 3 points 1 month ago

How much extra do you think it would have cost to add an 6' walkway to the bridge when it was built, merely as a future-proofing mechanism? When your first thought is, "No one would ever want to walk from one side to the other instead of using some kind of transportation," these are the kind of results you get.

[-] withabeard@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

American dream

...

[-] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Keeps the poors out. — Cave Johnson, probably

[-] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

NJ DOT controls Rt 3 that goes over the bridge. You can recommend it to them.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's the reason I can't simply walk to the nearby Denny's if I wanted to even tho it's like 3 blocks away; it's on the otherside of highway 99 and there are no pedestrian crossings for MILES over it.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 month ago

My FIL randomly got me an e-bike that I can't use for that exact reason. There's no way for me to get anywhere from my house without having to cross an extremely busy highway. I could drive the bike to places, but that defeats the purpose.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

How fast would the bike have to go to ride on highways? You're not going to safely go 60, but 40 might be obtainable if you can buy another battery of the same type, wire it in series, and don't give it too much current.

You're definitely shortening the life of everything, but it's better than no use at all.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 month ago

I'm 100% not going to go 40+mph on the highway on a bicycle. Luckily they're building a bypass, so in a year or two I'll be able to use it.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 0 points 1 month ago

Wait... What? Riding the bike defeats the purpose of having the bike? I'm confused.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 month ago

By drive the bike I mean putting it in my truck and bringing it somewhere safe to ride.

[-] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

lmao fucking americans... "The government won't let me walk on the highway, that's the real tyranny!" What a confused bunch.

[-] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Also america: driving takes one mile, walking takes 6 miles to get to the same place.

[-] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I see some water there. Backpack inflatable kayak?

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Its not walking, so fine in the eyes of the law i guess?

[-] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 month ago

I'm glad my cities stadium is built on top of a train station. And that they close lanes of the surrounding roads for pedestrians to walk on when there's a big match

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Taking transit to the stadium is so much better than driving it. Avoid getting gouged on parking fees and don't have to deal with shitty traffic going to and leaving the stadium.

[-] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

Seems like they should have a shuttle service

[-] TheLastRadiant@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

I wish their was more infrastructure designed around walking, it makes me sad to see places that are so car oriented, it makes them ugly and unpleasant compared to city’s and country’s that prioritize walking and promotes a health lifestyle instead of driving and sitting in a car all day

[-] Abundance114@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Check out Bangkok's Skyline rail, there's multiple levels to it and generally a walking level beneath the train, at least in the popular areas of town.

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I like walking when I'm not in a hurry and the weather is nice, but the weather usually isn't nice in most parts of the country (the US West Coast is an exception to that). I'm looking at moving to a southern state now and the only reason I'm even considering it is that I would be living in a car-centered area where I wouldn't have to spend more than a couple of minutes a day outdoors during the summer. Compare that to NYC where I used to live: milder summers, but still hot, and I had no choice but to endure them (and winters, and rainy days) because I couldn't drive to most places I went to. The unpleasantness of that far outweighs all the advantages of walkable neighborhoods for me.

[-] redditmademedoit@piefed.zip 1 points 1 month ago

This comment is truly mindblowing to me!

I do welcome you sharing your perspective, but I also feel like we must be of different species, because I so profoundly cannot relate at all. Fascinating!

[-] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

yea it’s like three highways over there - you’d think they’d build a bridge

[-] socphoenix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

To be fair, the road design is literal highways all the way around it making it impossible to safely walk. It’s terrible design and super hazardous to pedestrians but there is a safety reason behind the rule.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

They should have been required to build pedestrian bridges and paths. If we didn’t line in a shithole capitalist hellhole.

[-] Nomad@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago

Its also Americans driving on those roads.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

OP got the picture from either hexbear or X...

It was obviously going to miss the point.

It's not a law that you can't walk from a hotel to a stadium, it's a law that you can't jaywalk...

https://www.legalfix.com/statutes/state-codes/new-jersey/title-39/section-39-4-34

Likely across a highway/interstate that drink people keep thinking they can cross.

[-] mcv@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

If there's a clear need to cross, they should provide a way to cross. That's how you prevent people improvising their own way.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

That’s how you prevent people improvising their own way.

No, that's how you completely destroy anyone's ability to get anywhere...

Because no one would ever want to wait, so they'd constantly be widening every path.

Like, how often do you think an NFL game is even played at this one location?

And who's paying for it?

Does the hotel have to pay for it? The stadium because that's where people go?

The entire community they taxes even though they'd be the last ones to utilize a bridge that goes from a hotel to a stadium? They'll already have to deal with the major road closure to build the sky bridge no local will ever use

Like, I understand the spirit of your point and that's it's coming from a good place, but you don't understand any of what goes into just this one narrow aspect that slightly inconviences maybe a couple thousand out of town era 8 days out of the year.

[-] mcv@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

No, the thing I don't understand is why they wouldn't build any pedestrian or cycling infrastructure around stadiums and hotels in the first place.

[-] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

The decision to build a stadium that is completely inaccessible without a vehicle, even if you are staying at a hotel next door, is the point.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Or build a whole fucking multi-lane highway there, but can't be bothered to make it 6 feet wider so pedestrians and cyclists could use it, too.

[-] GioGioMioGio@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

I found the exact hotel on google maps and the distance to the stadium seems to be only 1km.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The freedom of cars.

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I don't see this cross-posted to it, so obligatory /c/fuckcars

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I came down with the flu and 102° fever while on a work trip this week. I ubered to an urgent care and the pharmacy was just across the street, but the street being a typical 5-lane American road with no sidewalk on either side, and no pedestrian crossing in sight in either direction.

I had to play frogger in the traffic standing in an empty lane until the next one cleared to get across.

Just truly mind-blowing bad design

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Standard American cities, aaahhh the beauty

[-] Strider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Lol, US things 🤷

(Don't hate! It really is a deeply US thing. We're a very car Country as Germany but a thing like that would be totally alien to us.)

[-] FluxUniversity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

fuck that

Why would anyone want to go somewhere where its illegal to walk outside?

No, its not illegal to walk outside. You're allowed to walk through public spaces.

It is in fact illegal to walk along or across an interstate highway, for safety's sake. In Germany, would you just casually stroll across the autobahn?

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Now I don't know that stadium but based on the sign and the fact that this is the US I'm gonna assume that the only roads that go to the stadium are 4 or 6 lane highways and it's outright dangerous to walk there

It's a joy

this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
22 points (95.8% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

15999 readers
53 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS