The only response I've seen so far from F-Droid is that they've put up a banner to Keep Android Open. Has there been any kind of plan for next steps?
They responded to it when it first came up 4 months ago. I'll paste my appropriate comment from that time.
The f-droid team spoke to that in a recent post. The post basically said that if that change isn't stopped on a government level there's no way for them to continue working. They didn't mention roms.
Edit for the link: https://f-droid.org/en/2025/09/29/google-developer-registration-decree.html
!linuxphones@lemmy.ca
They aren't competitive with Android or iOS phones presently
don't have the scale of userbase
but there's only one way that that's going to change, and that's people starting to use them.
("Linux" here as in "GNU/Linux", as opposed to "the Linux kernel", which Android phones also use.)
EDIT: Another option is to try to shift software use off of mobile devices as far as is practical, if you're willing to carry a second, larger device like a laptop. Just use the smartphone as a phone and as a modem for Internet access via tethering. I've generally been aiming to do that myself. I realize that that's not practical for everyone.
That approach does have some perks
you can get your audio jack, because the space constraints of a phone go away. You aren't dependent upon your hardware manufacturer for N years of updates before your hardware is forced to become out-of-date software-wise. The devices are generally a lot more capable and upgradeable. The hardware is more modular, and there are considerably more options. You can run whatever software you want.
But...it's bigger, the software library isn't generally optimized for small touchscreen use, so one-handed use while waiting in line isn't generally ideal, and it consumes more power. You can run some Android software via stuff like Waydroid, but I'm sure that software that requires a trusted hardware stack won't accept that.
Sorry to piss off all the Apple shills on here, but sounds like an opportunity to me. I think there's enough of us that want something better and some traction with Graphene and some Linux options. This should be a spark to ignite some fires. I'm disappointed but unsurpised by this news, but also a little excited about the window of motivation and opportunity this opens.
Could you go over what Graphene is for phones? Is it easy to switch to an alternative to android?
Its a version of android OS that can be installed on Google Pixel phones. Its a relatively easy switch if you're technically inclined, but the device needs to be carrier unlocked.
Time to popularize Linux phones. I read that the security model is lacking, but especially given that Android is Linux too, it shouldn’t be too difficult to catch up. The EU is also interested in tech independence, so that could be one of the sources of funding. And there are a few viable early projects, like Ubuntu Touch and Sailfish.
Sailfish is not very alive. Ubuntu Touch too.
But honestly yes. I think the problems are mostly in hardware support.
The political problems driving the push for independence are fairly recent, so the current state is unlikely to be extrapolable.
There are devices using these operating systems that are also gaining popularity, like Jolla, Volla and Fair phone.
How about phone as terminal for home pc.
There need to be enforced of competition law here. Companies aren't going to voluntarily support a platform with few users. Users aren't going to move to a platform without critical apps.
We live in a dystopia were you have to have the banks app to do online banking even on your desktop. You can't charge your car without an app. You can't navigate your car without a map app that has traffic information. Etc etc. I want FOSS alternatives to all these, but there isn't and Google could take even having a FOSS platform at all.
This something we need regulators to fix. It is a politically problem, not a technical one.
America screwing up trust should wake up Europe to dealing with American tech monopolies. Now it's not something just nerds and economists complain about, it is a geopolitical problem.
Corporations are getting WAY too much fucking power over our personal lives, it's at critical mass where their power is superseding that of our basic democratic rights.
We all knew it would happen, and here we are. We need to fight the fuck back with everything we've got, and coordination and planning is the first step.
There has to be something already happening, where do we sign up, who do we get in contact with? Where's the team?
Does anyone know or have any leads on that? I have the possibility to devote my life full time to it and I'm feeling like me and many others are not being utilized the way we could and are capable of.
Are there any details on how it will be implemented? Will it affect older versions or just new/updated devices?
How do I "uncertify"y Android device? Install a fork I guess. Shame it's not as easy as installing a new OS on the desktop.
So then, in 194 days, Android will be an inferior version of iOS and you may as well just switch to Apple because their devices have a better security posture.
It's mostly marketing honestly. They're both total ass.
FUCK no! Apple is dogshit locked down like crazy, so, fuck no, politely.
Just told them my opinion. Maybe you want too?
We need alternatives to big tech. They're reigning in and locking everything they can down, and the states are loving them for it as it solidifies their ability to control us.
They're kind of already is. It's the free and open source community.
The problem is phones are actually incredibly impressive pieces of hardware and the fact that we can Mass produce them has diluted that opinion. I'm actually to look into building my own phone and I wanted to have at least some near-flagship specs. I know how to design my own circuit boards and get someone to print them. But acquiring CPUs that perform at least 1/4 as well as Pixels or iPhones is objectively not possible, these companies have deals with manufacturers for exclusive products. And even if you could these chips are so precise you will never be able to figure out the signaling yourself.
Maybe things have gotten better now that we have ai and you don't need to be any sort of expert in anything you just need to be good enough at decision making problem solving and communicating to acquire the skills and knowledge to work on these chips. And by the time you've done all the work and acquired all the hardware you might have spent close to 3 to 5K on a device you could have just bought for $800. All for what, to circumvent privacy breaches that should be illegal in the first place?
And that's the root problem we're trying to solve. Another symptom of these companies being able to engage in the bad behavior that they do is that they gain the ability to overvalue themselves. There should be no safety or privacy concern when engaging in the purchase of any device for the same reason that people should not fear food poisoning every time they go to the grocery store.
That's what the regulators are for. This is a legal issue not a technical one.
But the only underlying cause for why we're not regulating tech companies is because fear of privacy violations is not reducing market activity. Apparently people are still going to use their phones even if their phones are listening to them having private conversations. Apparently people will still buy shit off of their phones even if their phones are going to use that data to show them ads.
Apparently the harm of your privacy being breached does not hurt enough to prevent you from doing good things.
Now if Android takes away my F-Droid, Tasker and Termux I'm gonna throw a fit. That's not privacy that's self-determination, I bought an Android because I can customize it to be as low friction for me as I need, if my phone starts giving me friction then we're going to have problems.
I want to get a pixel 10 so I can have grapheneOS on it. Fuck it! I am always in a race against time.
10 does not have a sim card tray, the 9's do. First post with grapheneos on a new to me 9 I was able to get!
If this happens, I guess it's Linux Phone time for me... I'm pretty certain GrapheneOS will be able to get around this abuse of power for a while, but it wouldn't take much effort from Google to kill them too ; they almost already have...
Or maybe dumb phone time ? But I like browsing Wikipedia and playing chess and RetroArch on my phone, I don't want to lose that just because big G$ said so...
Fwiw, just because a dumb phone doesn't give you access to "smart" features doesn't mean the capabilities aren't present on the phone. It's just a matter of what could be hidden on the circuit board (lots can be hidden in chips), and what can be hidden in usual expected traffic (if bandwidth requirements are low, even timing of packets could be used to encode hidden data that would never show up in any logs).
Plus the simple tracking of cellphones is necessary for them to function at all.
The new requirements will "only" apply for "certified" Android devices. I'm pretty sure, devices running a custom ROM aren't certified, especially if you don't even have Google Services installed. Nevertheless, I'm looking forward to a bright future for Linux phones.
Gonna have to wing Ubuntu touch and figure it out as i go. Fuck this shit. Access the boot loader while you can
So what other os that is supported with security updates and still works with whatapp/fb/insta sideloading is there? For me the security support and access to messaging apps is most important since that is what i use mostly. Any ideas?
They’re gonna take away my Projectivy, aren’t they? 😔
I'm assuming that this would apply to any "flavor" of android? ~~So Graphene is not immune from this?~~
Nvm, guess it is
From what I've heard, google free android versions won't be effected.
VPNs will be forbidden, age will be verified.
Coincidence that all are gaining traction?
IMO the big problem with this is for old APKs that were created before this new developer registration requirement- you won't be able to install them at all without rooting or using a different vanilla Android version.
I don't see that it really prohibits new app development or install.
There would be a problem if their developer registration process was difficult or used as a restriction somehow to govern who can register. But if they just require that developer's real identities are known to Google is really a matter of developer privacy, am I wrong?
What is the upside to this, to prevent scammers from anonymously streaming people's money with fake apps?
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
